Participatory sensing: enabling interactive local governance through citizen engagement

This paper explores participatory sensing and issues associated with governance in the light of new information gathering capabilities that directly engage citizens in collecting data and providing contextual insight that has the potential to greatly enhance Council operations. Executive summary Local government (such as the City of Melbourne) is accountable and responsible for establishment, execution and oversight of strategic objectives and resource management in the metropolis. Faced with a rising population, Council has in place a number of strategic plans to ensure it is able to deliver services that maintain (and ideally improve) the quality of life for its citizens (including residents, workers and visitors). This work explores participatory sensing (PS) and issues associated with governance in the light of new information gathering capabilities that directly engage citizens in collecting data and providing contextual insight that has the potential to greatly enhance Council operations in managing these environments. This white paper examines: Key hurdles affecting the viability and uptake of PS from different stakeholder perspectives The capacity of PS as a new and mutually beneficial communication link between citizens and government; the respective value propositions in participating, whilst simultaneously increasing engagement and enhancing City operations through co-production with citizens Technological elements of PS and associated privacy impacts through the application lens of noise monitoring Social impacts of emerging pervasive technologies, particularly the encroachment upon privacy, associated risks and implications, not only for the individual but also the impact in shared environments Responsibilities and avenues for mitigation assigned to respective stakeholders; including user awareness factors, policy frameworks and design level strategies The role of reputation and trust management between stakeholders in fostering productive links, along with the capacity for citizen empowerment The balance of perceived competing objectives of privacy and transparency, ethical strategies to address this challenge User perceptions of related issues taken from studies of internet and social media usage through computing and mobile platforms A development platform to measure user awareness of privacy risks, behavioural responses to a spectrum of engagement options effectively returning to the user a level of control over their participation Essential requirements for responsible implementation of PS platforms, considering ethical issues, responsibilities, privacy, transparency and accessibility

[1]  M. Evans,et al.  Public participation in an era of governance: lessons from Europe for Australian local government , 2013 .

[2]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  A pilot study of urban noise monitoring architecture using wireless sensor networks , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI).

[3]  Paul Roe,et al.  Reputation modelling in Citizen Science for environmental acoustic data analysis , 2013, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[4]  Wei Cheng,et al.  ARTSense: Anonymous reputation and trust in participatory sensing , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[5]  Adam D. Thierer,et al.  The Pursuit of Privacy in a World Where Information Control is Failing , 2013 .

[6]  Wen Hu,et al.  A privacy-preserving reputation system for participatory sensing , 2012, 37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[7]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions , 2012, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[8]  Chen-Khong Tham,et al.  Fairness and social welfare in incentivizing participatory sensing , 2012, 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON).

[9]  Jay P. Kesan,et al.  Information Privacy and Data Control in Cloud Computing: Consumers, Privacy Preferences, and Market Efficiency , 2012 .

[10]  Salil S. Kanhere,et al.  IncogniSense: An anonymity-preserving reputation framework for participatory sensing applications , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications.

[11]  Claudio Soriente,et al.  Participatory privacy: Enabling privacy in participatory sensing , 2012, IEEE Network.

[12]  Robert E. Crossler,et al.  Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems , 2011, MIS Q..

[13]  Salil S. Kanhere,et al.  A survey on privacy in mobile participatory sensing applications , 2011, J. Syst. Softw..

[14]  Srdjan Capkun,et al.  Home is safer than the cloud!: privacy concerns for consumer cloud storage , 2011, SOUPS.

[15]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Self-Surveillance Privacy , 2010 .

[16]  Katie Shilton Participatory Sensing: Building Empowering Surveillance , 2010 .

[17]  Abdulmonem Alabri,et al.  Enhancing the Quality and Trust of Citizen Science Data , 2010, 2010 IEEE Sixth International Conference on e-Science.

[18]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Participatory sensing in public spaces: activating urban surfaces with sensor probes , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[19]  Eiman Kanjo,et al.  NoiseSPY: A Real-Time Mobile Phone Platform for Urban Noise Monitoring and Mapping , 2010, Mob. Networks Appl..

[20]  Ramachandran Ramjee,et al.  PRISM: platform for remote sensing using smartphones , 2010, MobiSys '10.

[21]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Recruitment Framework for Participatory Sensing Data Collections , 2010, Pervasive.

[22]  Wen Hu,et al.  Ear-phone: an end-to-end participatory urban noise mapping system , 2010, IPSN '10.

[23]  J. Jurkovičová,et al.  Community response to environmental noise and the impact on cardiovascular risk score. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  Jaap-Henk Hoepman,et al.  The Privacy Coach: Supporting customer privacy in the Internet of Things , 2010, IOT 2010.

[25]  Bertrand De Longueville,et al.  "OMG, from here, I can see the flames!": a use case of mining location based social networks to acquire spatio-temporal data on forest fires , 2009, LBSN '09.

[26]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  Real noise from the urban environment: how ambient community noise affects health and what can be done about it. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[27]  Matthew Myron,et al.  What Is Privacy , 2009 .

[28]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Using Context Annotated Mobility Profiles to Recruit Data Collectors in Participatory Sensing , 2009, LoCA.

[29]  Minho Shin,et al.  Anonysense: privacy-aware people-centric sensing , 2008, MobiSys '08.

[30]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Participatory Privacy in Urban Sensing , 2008 .

[31]  S. Santini,et al.  First experiences using wireless sensor networks for noise pollution monitoring , 2008, REALWSN '08.

[32]  Cyrus Shahabi,et al.  Location Privacy in Geospatial Decision-Making , 2007, DNIS.

[33]  Tristan Henderson,et al.  Privacy in Location-Aware Computing Environments , 2007, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[34]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Privacy Impact Assessments: International Study of Their Application and Effects , 2007 .

[35]  Mark Andrejevic,et al.  iSpy: Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era , 2007 .

[36]  H. Miedema Annoyance Caused by Environmental Noise: Elements for Evidence-Based Noise Policies , 2007 .

[37]  J. Newman,et al.  Conclusion: power, participation and political renewal , 2007, Power, Participation and Political Renewal.

[38]  CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING SERIES The Quest for Personal Control over Mobile Location Privacy , 2022 .

[39]  E. Ostrom Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development , 1996 .

[40]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Ethical Issues in Participatory Sensing , 2012 .

[41]  F. Douma,et al.  Intelligent Transportation Systems: Personal Data Needs and Privacy , 2012 .

[42]  L. Steels,et al.  Citizen noise pollution monitoring , 2009, D.GO.

[43]  Michael Friedewald,et al.  Privacy, trust and policy-making: Challenges and responses , 2009, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..