Modelling the Digital Supply Chain enablers using TISM and MICMAC approach

The purpose of this article is to select digital supply chain enablers (DSCEs) to find its contextual relationship for successful digital supply chain (DSC) implementation. Total interpretative structural modelling (TISM) is used to develop the relationship among selected DSCEs. The findings of TISM are worked for the Matriced Impacts Croises Multiplication Appliqueeaun Classement (MICMAC) approach to identify the driving and dependence power of DSCEs. This paper identified 10 DSCEs and developed an integrated model using TISM and the FMICMAC approach. The model is used to recognize and organize the important enablers and show the direct and indirect relationship and effects of each enabler on the DSC implementation.

[1]  Tony Hines,et al.  Supply Chain Strategies , 2004 .

[2]  Zach G. Zacharia,et al.  DEFINING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[3]  Anshuman Khare,et al.  Examining potential benefits and challenges associated with the Internet of Things integration in supply chains , 2017 .

[4]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  An extension of MOORA approach for group decision making based on interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers in digital supply chain , 2017, 2017 Joint 17th World Congress of International Fuzzy Systems Association and 9th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems (IFSA-SCIS).

[5]  R. Ghodsi,et al.  A combined fuzzy PCA approach for location optimization and capacity planning in Glycyrrhizae green supply network design , 2019 .

[6]  Benjamin T. Hazen,et al.  Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance , 2017 .

[7]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  A TISM modeling of critical success factors of smartphone manufacturing ecosystem in India , 2016 .

[8]  R. Rajesh.  Technological capabilities and supply chain resilience of firms: A relational analysis using Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (TISM) , 2017 .

[9]  David Simchi-Levi,et al.  Identifying Risks and Mitigating Disruptions in the Automotive Supply Chain , 2015, Interfaces.

[10]  Jingjing Xu,et al.  Integrated inventory management and supplier base reduction in a supply chain with multiple uncertainties , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Christopher Brewster,et al.  IoT in Agriculture: Designing a Europe-Wide Large-Scale Pilot , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  S. J. Gorane,et al.  Modelling the supplier selection process enablers using ISM and fuzzy MICMAC approach , 2015 .

[13]  E. Tekez,et al.  A New Model for Continuous Evaluation of Suppliers with Real Execution Data , 2019 .

[14]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Digital Supply Chain: Literature review and a proposed framework for future research , 2018, Comput. Ind..

[15]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management: framework and further research directions , 2017 .

[16]  M. Ben-Daya,et al.  Internet of things and supply chain management: a literature review , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[17]  Isotilia Costa Melo,et al.  Balanced Scorecard for evaluating the performance of supply chains: a bibliometric study , 2020 .

[18]  Saul J. Berman.  Digital transformation: opportunities to create new business models , 2012 .

[19]  Alok Raj,et al.  Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective , 2020, International Journal of Production Economics.

[20]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Application of TISM and MICMAC for analysis of influential factors of sustainable development of tablet devices: a case study , 2018 .

[21]  Inayat Ullah,et al.  Analysis of barriers in implementation of digital transformation of supply chain using interpretive structural modelling approach , 2019, Journal of Modelling in Management.