Surface electromyography low-frequency content: Assessment in isometric conditions after electrocardiogram cancellation by the Segmented-Beat Modulation Method

Abstract Background Surface electromyography (SEMG) is widely used in clinics for assessing muscle functionality. All procedures proposed for noise reduction alter SEMG spectrum, especially in the low-frequency band (below 30 Hz). Indeed, low-frequency band is generally addressed to motion artifacts and electrocardiogram (ECG) interference without any further investigation on the possibility of SEMG having significant spectral content. The aim of the present study was evaluating SEMG frequency content to understand if low-frequency spectral content is negligible or, on the contrary, represents a significant SEMG portion potentially providing relevant clinical information. Method Isometric recordings of five muscles (sternocleidomastoideus, erectores spinae at L4, rectus abdominis, rectus femoris and tibialis anterior) were acquired in 10 young healthy voluntary subjects. These recordings were not affected by motion artifacts by construction and were pre-processed by the Segmented-Beat Modulation Method for ECG deletion before performing spectral analysis. Results Results indicated that SEMG frequency content is muscle and subject dependent. Overall, the 50th[25th;75th] percentiles spectrum median frequency and spectral power below 30 Hz were 74[54; 87] Hz and 18[10; 31] % of total (0–450 Hz) spectral power. Conclusions Low-frequency spectral content represents a significant SEMG portion and should not be neglected.

[1]  G. Naik,et al.  Transradial Amputee Gesture Classification Using an Optimal Number of sEMG Sensors: An Approach Using ICA Clustering , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Miroslav Zivanovic,et al.  Wavelet-based unsupervised learning method for electrocardiogram suppression in surface electromyograms. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  Dario Farina,et al.  Non-invasive characterization of single motor unit electromyographic and mechanomyographic activities in the biceps brachii muscle. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[4]  Sandro Fioretti,et al.  Evaluation of the low-frequency components in surface electromyography , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[5]  Peter Holland,et al.  Removing ECG noise from surface EMG signals using adaptive filtering , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  D Chaffin,et al.  High-pass filtering to remove electrocardiographic interference from torso EMG recordings. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  Sandro Fioretti,et al.  Segmented beat modulation method for electrocardiogram estimation from noisy recordings. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  S Fioretti,et al.  Muscle activation patterns related to diabetic neuropathy in elderly subjects: A Functional Reach Test study. , 2016, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  Hojun Yeom,et al.  ECG Artifact Removal from Surface EMG Using Adaptive filter Algorithm , 2012 .

[10]  Mikhail Kuznetsov,et al.  Filtering the surface EMG signal: Movement artifact and baseline noise contamination. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Vinzenz von Tscharner,et al.  Removal of the electrocardiogram signal from surface EMG recordings using non-linearly scaled wavelets. , 2011, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[12]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[13]  G. Allison,et al.  The relationship between EMG median frequency and low frequency band amplitude changes at different levels of muscle capacity. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  Laura Burattini,et al.  Correlation method versus enhanced modified moving average method for automatic detection of T-wave alternans , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[15]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Removing ECG contamination from EMG recordings: a comparison of ICA-based and other filtering procedures. , 2012, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[16]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Effects of muscle fiber type and size on EMG median frequency and conduction velocity. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  Jack P Callaghan,et al.  Elimination of electrocardiogram contamination from electromyogram signals: An evaluation of currently used removal techniques. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[18]  P. Hodges,et al.  A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  Wenbin Chen,et al.  Continuous motion decoding from EMG using independent component analysis and adaptive model training , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  O. H. Schmitt,et al.  Report of committee on electrocardiography, American Heart Association. Recommendations for standardization of leads and of specifications for instruments in electrocardiography and vectorcardiography. , 1967, Circulation.

[21]  B Jonsson,et al.  Discomfort from the use of wire electrodes for electromyography. , 1968, Electromyography.

[22]  S. Studenski,et al.  Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. , 1990, Journal of gerontology.

[23]  Katerina Hnatkova,et al.  Subject-specific heart rate dependency of electrocardiographic QT, PQ, and QRS intervals. , 2008, Journal of electrocardiology.

[24]  M. Knaflitz,et al.  A statistical method for the measurement of muscle activation intervals from surface myoelectric signal during gait , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  R. Scott,et al.  A Nonstationary Model for the Electromyogram , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Federica Verdini,et al.  Separation of Superimposed Electrocardiographic and Electromyographic Signals , 2017 .

[27]  S Fioretti,et al.  The surface electromyographic evaluation of the Functional Reach in elderly subjects. , 2016, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[28]  R Merletti,et al.  A new method to assess skin treatments for lowering the impedance and noise of individual gelled Ag-AgCl electrodes. , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[29]  C Marque,et al.  Adaptive filtering for ECG rejection from surface EMG recordings. , 2005, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[30]  Angela Agostinelli,et al.  Extracting a clean ECG from a noisy recording: A new method based on segmented-beat modulation , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[31]  Vladimir Medved,et al.  Standards for Reporting EMG Data , 2000, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology.

[32]  I. Campanini,et al.  Technical Aspects of Surface Electromyography for Clinicians , 2010 .

[33]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .