Contextual effects on number–time interaction

Time perception has long been known to be affected by numerical representations. Recent studies further demonstrate that when participants estimate the duration of Arabic numbers, number magnitude, though task-irrelevant, biases duration judgment to produce underestimation for smaller numbers and overestimation for larger numbers. Such effects were found in the present study to be significantly reduced when a weight unit gram was suffixed to the numbers rendering the mental magnitude differences between different numbers less distinctive. The effects were enhanced when a different unit kilogram was suffixed to the numbers enlarging the perceived magnitude differences between different numbers. The results indicate that effects of number magnitude on duration estimation should not be attributed to the mathematical differences between numbers but to how the numbers are perceived to differ from each other in magnitude in specific contexts when they denote concrete items. The results also provide new evidence for the theoretical proposal of a common generalized magnitude system and indicate that the system must be extended to include other action-oriented magnitudes, such as weight.

[1]  Luigi Trojano,et al.  A common processing system for duration, order and spatial information: evidence from a time estimation task , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Giacomo Koch,et al.  Relativistic Compression and Expansion of Experiential Time in the Left and Right Space , 2008, PloS one.

[4]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[5]  Michael Andres,et al.  Number magnitude potentiates action judgements , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Olivier Hermine,et al.  Phenotypic and Genotypic Characteristics of Mastocytosis According to the Age of Onset , 2008, PloS one.

[7]  R. Desimone,et al.  Crowding: Including illusory conjunctions, surround suppression, and attention. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[8]  C. Caltagirone,et al.  Perceiving numbers alters time perception , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  M. Turvey,et al.  Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Sheng He,et al.  Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[11]  E. Brannon,et al.  Nonverbal representation of time and number in adults. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[12]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  M. Pesenti,et al.  Numerosity-duration interference: a Stroop experiment. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[14]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[15]  L. Boroditsky,et al.  Time in the mind: Using space to think about time , 2008, Cognition.

[16]  R. Passingham,et al.  Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[17]  Scott W. Brown Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  J. Decety,et al.  Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  Sylvie Droit-Volet,et al.  Time and number discrimination in a bisection task with a sequence of stimuli: a developmental approach. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[21]  Bert H. Hodges Values Define Fields: The Intentional Dynamics of Driving, Carrying, Leading, Negotiating, and Conversing , 2007 .