Concurrent TMS–fMRI reveals dynamic interhemispheric influences of the right parietal cortex during exogenously cued visuospatial attention

We used concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional MRI (TMS‐fMRI) during a visuospatial cueing paradigm in humans, to study the causal role of the right angular gyrus (AG) as a source of attentional control. Our findings show that TMS over the right AG (high vs. low intensity) modulates neural responses interhemispherically, in a manner that varies dynamically with the current attentional condition. The behavioural impact of such TMS depended not only on the target hemifield but also on exogenous cue validity, facilitating spatial reorienting to invalidly cued right visual targets. On a neural level, right AG TMS had corresponding interhemispheric effects in the left AG and left retinotopic cortex, including area V1. We conclude that the direction of covert visuospatial attention can involve dynamic interplay between the right AG and remote interconnected regions of the opposite left hemisphere, whereas our findings also suggest that the right AG can influence responses in the retinotopic visual cortex.

[1]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Cerebral correlates of alerting, orienting and reorienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Abnormal Attentional Modulation of Retinotopic Cortex in Parietal Patients with Spatial Neglect , 2008, Current Biology.

[3]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Enhancement of visual selection during transient disruption of parietal cortex , 2006, Brain Research.

[4]  M. Corbetta,et al.  An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  C. Kennard,et al.  The anatomy of visual neglect. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Neurodisruption of selective attention: insights and implications , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  M. Kinsbourne Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. , 1977, Advances in neurology.

[9]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Mesulam Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  Sven Bestmann,et al.  Studying the Role of Human Parietal Cortex in Visuospatial Attention with Concurrent TMS–fMRI , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  E. Macaluso,et al.  Supramodal Effects of Covert Spatial Orienting Triggered by Visual or Tactile Events , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  A. Cowey,et al.  Human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is involved in visual search for conjunctions but not features: A theta TMS study , 2009, Cortex.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[16]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Concurrent TMS-fMRI and Psychophysics Reveal Frontal Influences on Human Retinotopic Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[17]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Precuneus shares intrinsic functional architecture in humans and monkeys , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: I. Parcellation of areas based on distinctive limbic and sensory corticocortical connections , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  S. Bestmann,et al.  Functional MRI of cortical activations induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) , 2001, Neuroreport.

[20]  Ziad Nahas,et al.  A combined TMS/fMRI study of intensity-dependent TMS over motor cortex , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[21]  R. Goebel,et al.  Imaging the brain activity changes underlying impaired visuospatial judgments: simultaneous FMRI, TMS, and behavioral studies. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Michael L Platt,et al.  Visual and saccade-related activity in macaque posterior cingulate cortex. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  R Turner,et al.  Optimisation of the 3D MDEFT sequence for anatomical brain imaging: technical implications at 1.5 and 3 T , 2004, NeuroImage.

[25]  P. Haggard,et al.  Dorsal premotor cortex exerts state-dependent causal influences on activity in contralateral primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  Effects of Right Parietal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Object Identification and Orientation Judgments , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Sven Bestmann,et al.  Concurrent brain-stimulation and neuroimaging for studies of cognition , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Mapping causal interregional influences with concurrent TMS–fMRI , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Image Artifacts in Concurrent Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and fMRI Caused by Leakage Currents: Modeling and Compensation , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[30]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Interhemispheric Effect of Parietal TMS on Somatosensory Response Confirmed Directly with Concurrent TMS–fMRI , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  S. Bestmann,et al.  On the synchronization of transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional echo‐planar imaging , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[32]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  Christopher Kennard,et al.  Differential cortical activation during voluntary and reflexive saccades in man , 2003, NeuroImage.

[35]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Spatial attention deficits in humans: a comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[36]  Carmel Mevorach,et al.  Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  The role of the angular gyrus in visual conjunction search investigated using signal detection analysis and transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: evidence from concurrent TMS-fMRI. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Everything You Never Wanted to Know about Circular Analysis, but Were Afraid to Ask , 2010, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[41]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience – virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[42]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Transient Attention Enhances Perceptual Performance and fMRI Response in Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[43]  P. B. Cipolloni,et al.  Cytoarchitecture and cortical connections of the posterior cingulate and adjacent somatosensory fields in the rhesus monkey , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[44]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Delayed Striate Cortical Activation during Spatial Attention , 2002, Neuron.

[45]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  The perceptual and functional consequences of parietal top-down modulation on the visual cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  J. Driver,et al.  Combining TMS and fMRI: From ‘virtual lesions’ to functional-network accounts of cognition , 2009, Cortex.

[47]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.