Pervasive real-time IT as a disruptive technology for the IS field

This paper builds on ideas in a recent paper which argued that the core subject matter of the IS field should not be "the IT artifact" (as suggested by Orlikowski and Lacono, 2001), but rather IT-intensive work systems. This paper extends the ideas in the previous paper by exploring whether pervasive real time IT might be a disruptive technology (Christensen, 1997) for the IS field, implying that the long term vibrancy and impact of the field depends on a change in focus and scope that emphasizes some version of work system concepts. This paper defines the term "work system" and explains that information systems, projects, value chains, and supply chains are all special cases that should inherit work system terminology, generalizations, and success factors. It summarizes six real world examples to demonstrate different types of overlap between work systems and information systems that support them. Comparison of these systems shows that many of today's more interesting information systems reflect a trend toward pervasive real time IT, i.e., increasingly commonplace application of IT to automate work practices or support and control them in real time. As this trend continues, the overlap between information systems and the work systems they support will increase, leading to a situation in which studying just the information system but not the work system it supports will have less and less significance. The paper concludes by arguing that the IS field needs to encompass work systems that do more than processing information. Expansion in this direction has implications for analyzing systems, conceptualizing system life cycles, communicating with business professionals, interpreting and performing research, and establishing different relationships with other academic fields such as organization behavior and operations management.

[1]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Editorial Notes , 1913, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Selecting Research Topics: Personal Experiences and Speculations For the Future , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.

[4]  John F. Rockart,et al.  IS Research Relevance Revisited: Subtle Accomplishment, Unfulfilled Promise, or Serial Hypocrisy? , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Steven L. Alter Which Life Cycle - Work System, Information System, or Software? , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Steven L. Alter,et al.  Information Systems: Foundation of E-Business , 2002 .

[7]  Kathryn Graziano The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail , 1998 .

[8]  Steven L. Alter,et al.  The Work System Method for Understanding Information Systems and Information Systems Research , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Rigor vs. relevance revisited: response to Benbasat and Zmud , 1999 .

[10]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[11]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimilation Gaps , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  M. Markus,et al.  The Magic Bullet Theory in IT-Enabled Transformation , 1997 .

[14]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[15]  M. Hammer,et al.  REENGINEERING THE CORPORATION: A MANIFESTO FOR BUSINESS REVOLUTION , 1995 .

[16]  F. Caeldries Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1994 .

[17]  B Reimus The IT system that couldn't deliver. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[18]  Steven L. Alter A General, Yet Useful Theory of Information Systems , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[20]  Judy E. Scott,et al.  Does the Trend Toward E-Business Call for Changes in the Fundamental Concepts of Information Systems? A Debate , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Information Systems as a Reference Discipline , 2002, MIS Q..