Magnetomyographic recording and identification of uterine contractions using Hilbert-wavelet transforms

We propose a multi-stage approach using Wavelet and Hilbert transforms to identify uterine contraction bursts in magnetomyogram (MMG) signals measured using a 151 magnetic sensor array. In the first stage, we decompose the MMG signals by wavelet analysis into multilevel approximate and detail coefficients. In each level, the signals are reconstructed using the detail coefficients followed by the computation of the Hilbert transform. The Hilbert amplitude of the reconstructed signals from different frequency bands (0.1-1 Hz) is summed up over all the sensors to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. Using a novel clustering technique, affinity propagation, the contractile bursts are distinguished from the noise level. The method is applied on simulated MMG data, using a simple stochastic model to determine its robustness and to seven MMG datasets.

[1]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Synchronization analysis of the uterine magnetic activity during contractions , 2005, Biomedical engineering online.

[2]  Mamun Bin Ibne Reaz,et al.  Electromyography signal analysis using wavelet transform and higher order statistics to determine muscle contraction , 2009, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[3]  N Radhakrishnan,et al.  A fast algorithm for detecting contractions in uterine electromyography. , 2000, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[4]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points , 2007, Science.

[5]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  First magnetomyographic recordings of uterine activity with spatial-temporal information with a 151-channel sensor array. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  E E Daniel,et al.  Gap junctions: their presence and necessity in myometrium during parturition. , 1977, Science.

[7]  C N SMYTH,et al.  THE GUARD‐RING TOCODYNAMOMETER , 1957, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Empire.

[8]  Gregor Reid,et al.  Prediction of preterm birth in symptomatic women using decision tree modeling for biomarkers. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  C Marque,et al.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  G. Saade,et al.  Control and assessment of the uterus and cervix during pregnancy and labour. , 1998, Human reproduction update.

[11]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Detection of Uterine MMG Contractions Using a Multiple Change Point Estimator and the K-Means Cluster Algorithm , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  R. Garfield,et al.  Uterine contractility as assessed by abdominal surface recording of electromyographic activity in rats during pregnancy. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  G. Saade,et al.  Comparing uterine electromyography activity of antepartum patients versus term labor patients. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.