Connecting the Space between Design and Research: Explorations in participatory research supervision

Abstract In this article we offer a single case study using an action research method for gathering and analysing data offering insights valuable to both design and research supervision practice. We do not attempt to generalise from this single case, but offer it as an instance that can improve our understanding of research supervision practice. We question the conventional ‘dyadic’ models of research supervision and outline a more collaborative model, based on the signature pedagogy of architecture: the design studio. A novel approach to the supervision of creatively oriented postgraduate students is proposed, including new approaches to design methods and participatory supervision that draw on established design studio practices. This model collapses the distance between design and research activities. Our case study involving Master's Research Students supervision in the discipline of Architecture, shows how ‘connected learning’ emerges from this approach. This type of learning builds strong elements of creativity and fun, which promote and enhance student engagement. The results of our action research suggest that students learn to research more easily in such an environment and supervisory practices are enhanced when we apply the techniques and characteristics of design studio pedagogy to the more conventional research pedagogies imported from the humanities. We believe that other creative disciplines can apply similar tactics to enrich both the creative practice of research and the supervision of HDR students.

[1]  Glenda Amayo Caldwell,et al.  Shut up & write! Facilitating informal learning in doctoral education , 2012 .

[2]  Bill Green,et al.  Theorising postgraduate pedagogy , 1995 .

[3]  James Cumming.  Representing the complexity, diversity and particularity of the doctoral enterprise in Australia , 2007 .

[4]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[5]  Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson,et al.  The Supervision of Practice‐based Research Degrees in Art and Design , 2000 .

[6]  R. Pain,et al.  Participatory action research. , 2008 .

[7]  Leonard J. Waks,et al.  Donald Schon's Philosophy of Design and Design Education , 2001 .

[8]  Glenda Amayo Caldwell,et al.  Guerrillas in the [Urban] Midst: Developing and Using Creative Research Methods—Guerrilla Research Tactics , 2015 .

[9]  Peter G. Taylor,et al.  Place and Space in the Design of New Learning Environments , 2000 .

[10]  L. Shulman.  Signature pedagogies in the professions , 2005, Daedalus.

[11]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[12]  Philip Crowther,et al.  Dichotomy in the design studio : adapting to new blended learning environments , 2011 .

[13]  D. Boud,et al.  ‘Peer learning’ as pedagogic discourse for research education 1 , 2005 .

[14]  A. Ben-Ze'ev,et al.  Emotional phenomena and the student–instructor relationships , 2002 .

[15]  Charles C. Bonwell,et al.  Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ERIC Digest. , 1991 .

[16]  I. Mewburn.  Lost in translation , 2012 .

[17]  Sabine Fenstermacher.  Lives In Context The Art Of Life History Research , 2016 .

[18]  David Hinson,et al.  Design as Research , 2007, Architectural Research Quarterly.

[19]  N. Hopwood.  Doctoral experience and learning from a sociocultural perspective , 2010 .

[20]  Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson,et al.  Identity Change , 2005 .

[21]  Helena Webster,et al.  Facilitating critically reflective learning: excavating the role of the design tutor in architectural education , 2004 .

[22]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ERIC Digest. , 1991 .

[23]  Brent Allpress,et al.  Supervising Practices for Postgraduate Research in Art, Architecture and Design , 2012 .

[24]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[25]  L. Duxbury.  Opening the Door , 2012 .

[26]  Kazys Varnelis.  Is There Research in the Studio? , 2007 .

[27]  E. Eisner.  Forms of Understanding and the Future of Educational Research , 1993 .

[28]  Kris D. Gutiérrez,et al.  Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and Design , 2013 .

[29]  D. Caulley.  Review & Booknote: The Unobtrusive Researcher: A Guide to Methods , 1994 .

[30]  Inger Mewburn,et al.  Learning networks and the journey of ‘becoming doctor’ , 2010 .

[31]  Peter Dallow,et al.  Representing creativeness : practice-based approaches to research in creative arts , 2003 .

[32]  J. Knowles,et al.  Transforming Research: Possibilities for Arts-Informed Scholarship? , 2002 .

[33]  G. Melles,et al.  Writing purposefully in art and design , 2012 .

[34]  Christopher M. Clark,et al.  A Signature Pedagogy in Doctoral Education: The Leader–Scholar Community , 2009 .

[35]  J. Tagg,et al.  From Teaching to Learning — A New Paradigm For Undergraduate Education , 1995 .

[36]  Summer Smith Taylor.  Effects of Studio Space on Teaching and Learning: Preliminary Findings from Two Case Studies , 2009 .

[37]  Ove Christensen.  Forbundne lærere: Sheryl Nussbaum-Beach og Lani Ritter Hall, The Connected Educator: Learning and Leading in a Digital Age , 2012 .

[38]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[39]  H. Webster.  The Architectural Review , 2005 .

[40]  B. Green,et al.  The PhD and the Autonomous Self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy , 2000 .

[41]  Cheri Logan.  Circles of Practice: Educational and Professional Graphic Design. , 2006 .

[42]  Eva Bendix Petersen,et al.  Negotiating academicity: postgraduate research supervision as category boundary work , 2007 .