Driving behaviour responses to a moose encounter, automatic speed camera, wildlife warning sign and radio message determined in a factorial simulator study.

In a driving simulator study, driving behaviour responses (speed and deceleration) to encountering a moose, automatic speed camera, wildlife warning sign and radio message, with or without a wildlife fence and in dense forest or open landscape, were analysed. The study consisted of a factorial experiment that examined responses to factors singly and in combination over 9-km road stretches driven eight times by 25 participants (10 men, 15 women). The aims were to: determine the most effective animal-vehicle collision (AVC) countermeasures in reducing vehicle speed and test whether these are more effective in combination for reducing vehicle speed; identify the most effective countermeasures on encountering moose; and determine whether the driving responses to AVC countermeasures are affected by the presence of wildlife fences and landscape characteristics. The AVC countermeasures that proved most effective in reducing vehicle speed were a wildlife warning sign and radio message, while automatic speed cameras had a speed-increasing effect. There were no statistically significant interactions between different countermeasures and moose encounters. However, there was a tendency for a stronger speed-reducing effect from the radio message warning and from a combination of a radio message and wildlife warning sign in velocity profiles covering longer driving distances than the statistical tests. Encountering a moose during the drive had the overall strongest speed-reducing effect and gave the strongest deceleration, indicating that moose decoys or moose artwork might be useful as speed-reducing countermeasures. Furthermore, drivers reduced speed earlier on encountering a moose in open landscape and had lower velocity when driving past it. The presence of a wildlife fence on encountering the moose resulted in smaller deceleration.

[1]  Giorgos Mountrakis,et al.  Spatial wildlife-vehicle collision models: a review of current work and its application to transportation mitigation projects. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  Torsten Hothorn,et al.  Large-Scale Model-Based Assessment of Deer-Vehicle Collision Risk , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  E. Hazebroek,et al.  Ungulate Traffic Collisions in Europe , 1996 .

[4]  Alan D. Woolf,et al.  Site and landscape conditions at white-tailed deer/vehicle collision locations in Illinois , 1999 .

[5]  J. DeWoody,et al.  A review of mitigation measures for reducing wildlife mortality on roadways , 2009 .

[6]  Ali S Al-Ghamdi,et al.  Warning signs as countermeasures to camel-vehicle collisions in Saudi Arabia. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  J. S. Lindzey,et al.  FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHWAY MORTALITY OF WHITE-TAILED DEER , 1974 .

[8]  Keith K Knapp,et al.  Crash Reduction Factors for Deer-Vehicle Crash Countermeasures: State of the Knowledge and Suggested Safety Research Needs , 2005 .

[9]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[10]  R. Case.  INTERSTATE HIGHWAY ROAD-KILLED ANIMALS: A DATA SOURCE FOR BIOLOGISTS1 , 1978 .

[11]  Laura Stanley,et al.  Responses to Enhanced Wildlife Advisories in a Simulated Environment , 2006 .

[12]  Christer Ahlström,et al.  Experiencing moose and landscape while driving: a simulator and questionnaire study , 2015 .

[13]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[14]  Mats Wiklund,et al.  Crash Barriers and Driver Behavior: A Simulator Study , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[15]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Road User Behaviour and Traffic Accidents , 1975 .

[16]  R. Allen,et al.  Deer-Car Accidents in Southern Michigan , 1976 .

[17]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driving simulator validation for speed research. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Lars Åberg.  The human factor in game-vehicle accidents: A study of drivers' information acquisition , 1981 .

[19]  V. Radeloff,et al.  Difference in spatiotemporal patterns of wildlife road-crossings and wildlife-vehicle collisions , 2012 .

[20]  Masaki Hirota,et al.  Low-Cost Infrared Imaging Sensors for Automotive Applications , 2004 .

[21]  D. F. Reed,et al.  Effectiveness of a Lighted, Animated Deer Crossing Sign , 1975 .

[22]  A. Seiler.  Predicting locations of moose–vehicle collisions in Sweden , 2005 .

[23]  Göran Nilsson,et al.  Traffic Safety Dimensions and the Power Model to Describe the Effect of Speed on Safety , 2004 .

[24]  Ronald R. Mourant,et al.  Simulator Sickness in a Virtual Environments Driving Simulator , 2000 .

[25]  Tamás Cserkész,et al.  Interchange as the main factor determining wildlife–vehicle collision hotspots on the fenced highways: spatial analysis and applications , 2013, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[26]  R. J. Putmam.  Deer and Road Traffic Accidents: Options for Management , 1997 .

[27]  A. Zuur,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[28]  Lauren L. Mastro,et al.  Factors Influencing a Motorist's Ability to Detect Deer at Night , 2010 .

[29]  Mats Wiklund,et al.  Effect of surrounding landscape on driving behaviour: A driving simulator study , 2009 .

[30]  Ahmed Al-Kaisy,et al.  Effectiveness of Animal Advisory Messages on Dynamic Message Signs as a Speed Reduction Tool: Case Study in Rural Montana , 2006 .

[31]  Allan F Williams,et al.  Methods to Reduce Traffic Crashes Involving Deer: What Works and What Does Not , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[32]  A. Clevenger,et al.  A Comparison of Data Sets Varying in Spatial Accuracy Used to Predict the Occurrence of Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions , 2009, Environmental management.

[33]  Andreas Seiler,et al.  Trends and spatial patterns in ungulate-vehicle collisions in Sweden , 2004, Wildlife Biology.

[34]  Lauren L. Mastro,et al.  Deer-vehicle collision prevention techniques , 2008 .

[35]  Rune Elvik,et al.  The Handbook of Road Safety Measures , 2009 .

[36]  Anthony P. Clevenger,et al.  Highway mitigation fencing reduces wildlife-vehicle collisions , 2001 .