The efficacy of Neural Planning Metrics: A meta-analysis of PKL on nuScenes

A high-performing object detection system plays a crucial role in autonomous driving (AD). The performance, typically evaluated in terms of mean Average Precision, does not take into account orientation and distance of the actors in the scene, which are important for the safe AD. It also ignores environmental context. Recently, Philion et al. proposed a neural planning metric (PKL), based on the KL divergence of a planner's trajectory and the groundtruth route, to accommodate these requirements. In this paper, we use this neural planning metric to score all submissions of the nuScenes detection challenge and analyze the results. We find that while somewhat correlated with mAP, the PKL metric shows different behavior to increased traffic density, ego velocity, road curvature and intersections. Finally, we propose ideas to extend the neural planning metric.

[1]  Sanja Fidler,et al.  Learning to Evaluate Perception Models Using Planner-Centric Metrics , 2020, 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[2]  Andrea Simonelli,et al.  Disentangling Monocular 3D Object Detection , 2019, 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[3]  Qiang Xu,et al.  nuScenes: A Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving , 2019, 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[4]  Benjin Zhu,et al.  Class-balanced Grouping and Sampling for Point Cloud 3D Object Detection , 2019, ArXiv.

[5]  Andreas Geiger,et al.  Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  Dragomir Anguelov,et al.  Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset , 2019, 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).