Valence Asymmetry in Attitude Formation

A considerable amount of research indicates that political conservatives and liberals perceive their social worlds very differently, with conservatives perceiving the world more negatively than liberals. Two studies examined how these varying perceptions may develop by exploring the relation between political ideology and attitude formation. In both studies, participants completed an evaluative conditioning paradigm in which novel stimuli were paired with either positive or negative images. Political conservatives were more susceptible to conditioning with negative stimuli than conditioning with positive stimuli as compared to political liberals. Specifically, conservatives were less susceptible to conditioning with positive stimuli than liberals. Conditioning with negative stimuli did not differ by political ideology. These findings suggest fundamental differences in the formation of positive versus negative attitudes between conservatives and liberals.

[1]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  R. Janoff-Bulman To Provide or Protect: Motivational Bases of Political Liberalism and Conservatism , 2009 .

[3]  B. Altemeyer,et al.  The Other “Authoritarian Personality” , 1998 .

[4]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation , 2009 .

[5]  J. Duckitt,et al.  A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice , 2001 .

[6]  C. Staats,et al.  Attitudes established by classical conditioning. , 1958, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  People as intuitive prosecutors: The impact of social-control goals on attributions of responsibility , 2007 .

[8]  Michael A. Olson,et al.  Implicit Attitude Formation Through Classical Conditioning , 2001, Psychological science.

[9]  Melissa J. Ferguson,et al.  After-affects: How automatic evaluations influence the interpretation of subsequent, unrelated stimuli , 2005 .

[10]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Ideology Its Resurgence in Social , Personality , and Political Psychology , 2008 .

[11]  Kevin B. Smith,et al.  Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits , 2008, Science.

[12]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  Opinions and personality , 1957 .

[13]  R. Livingston,et al.  Why Are Some Individuals Not Racially Biased? , 2007, Psychological science.

[14]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Accessible attitudes influence categorization of multiply categorizable objects. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  Opinions and Personality. , 1956 .

[16]  D. Katz THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES , 1960 .

[17]  Stephen H. Wagner,et al.  Threat, Authoritarianism, and Voting: An Investigation of Personality and Persuasion , 1999 .

[18]  Denise M. Driscoll,et al.  On the Functional Value of Attitudes: The Influence of Accessible Attitudes on the Ease and Quality of Decision Making , 1992 .

[19]  J. Tomaka,et al.  Attitude accessibility as a moderator of autonomic reactivity during decision making. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  R. Fazio,et al.  On the orienting value of attitudes: attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  R. Janoff-Bulman,et al.  Mapping moral motives : Approach, avoidance, and political orientation , 2008 .

[23]  P. Lang International Affective Picture System (IAPS) : Technical Manual and Affective Ratings , 1995 .