Pediatric ambulatory appointment scheduling: a qualitative study of stakeholders' perceptions and experiences.

OBJECTIVE Scheduling ambulatory clinic appointments includes a complex set of factors and diverse stakeholders. Families, administrative staff and clinicians may have varied experiences with scheduling clinic appointments. The objective of our study was to understand stakeholders' perceptions and experiences with scheduling pediatric ambulatory clinic appointments. DESIGN Guided methodologically by qualitative description, focus groups were conducted separately with three stakeholder groups and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. SETTING This qualitative study was completed at a children's hospital in Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS Parents, administrative professionals and clinicians who used the pediatric ambulatory scheduling system regularly to elicit perceptions and experiences about issues and areas where improvements could be made. RESULTS Across 12 focus groups, parents (n = 11), administrative professionals (n = 23) and clinicians (n = 13) discussed areas for improvement related to the pediatric ambulatory scheduling system. The perceived areas for improvement were grouped into three categories regarding levels of influence: (i) 'intrapersonal': knowledge, skills and behaviors (e.g. insufficient training of administrative professionals); (ii) 'interpersonal': communication processes (e.g. parents not receiving confirmation letters); and (iii) 'institutional': structures and processes (e.g. varying practices and processes across clinics). CONCLUSIONS Stakeholders provided a rich description of the interrelated factors and processes that influenced the scheduling of pediatric ambulatory clinic appointments. Multilevel, experimental interventions are needed to test whether the findings described herein can enhance the structure and function of pediatric ambulatory appointment scheduling.

[1]  P. Lindenauer,et al.  Characteristics of High-Performing Primary Care Pediatric Practices: A Qualitative Study. , 2020, Academic pediatrics.

[2]  C. Simonetta,et al.  Improving nonattendance rates among pediatric patients with Medicaid or private insurance. , 2019, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[3]  D. Snowdon,et al.  Staff perspectives of a model of access and triage for reducing waiting time in ambulatory services: a qualitative study , 2019, BMC Health Services Research.

[4]  Christopher R. Harper,et al.  Using the Social-Ecological Model to Improve Access to Care for Adolescents and Young Adults. , 2018, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[5]  C. Bundy,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to health care professionals discussing child weight with parents: A meta‐synthesis of qualitative studies , 2018, British journal of health psychology.

[6]  Kristin N. Ray,et al.  Impact of Implementation of Electronically Transmitted Referrals on Pediatric Subspecialty Visit Attendance. , 2017, Academic pediatrics.

[7]  Kristin N. Ray,et al.  Family Perspectives on High-Quality Pediatric Subspecialty Referrals. , 2016, Academic pediatrics.

[8]  John Toussaint,et al.  Innovation and Best Practices in Health Care Scheduling , 2015 .

[9]  Susan Michie,et al.  Demystifying theory and its use in improvement , 2015, BMJ quality & safety.

[10]  J. Oetzel,et al.  Communication in acute ambulatory care. , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  Rosnah Mohd Yusuff,et al.  USE OF SIMULATION TO SOLVE OUTPATIENT CLINIC PROBLEMS: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE , 2013 .

[12]  Melinda M. Davis,et al.  Perceived barriers, resources, and training needs of rural primary care providers relevant to the management of childhood obesity. , 2013, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[13]  Lisa M Klesges,et al.  What Does It Mean to “Employ” the RE-AIM Model? , 2013, Evaluation & the health professions.

[14]  F. Candoso,et al.  Implementation of a complexity classification system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities for financing purposes - comparing scales , 2009, BMC Health Services Research.

[15]  Silke Helbig,et al.  Quality management: reduction of waiting time and efficiency enhancement in an ENT-university outpatients' department , 2009, BMC health services research.

[16]  Emre A. Veral,et al.  OUTPATIENT SCHEDULING IN HEALTH CARE: A REVIEW OF LITERATURE , 2003 .

[17]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[18]  Emre A. Veral,et al.  Designing appointment scheduling systems for ambulatory care services , 2006, Health care management science.

[19]  Audrey Paulman,et al.  Why We Don’t Come: Patient Perceptions on No-Shows , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[20]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  A Sequential Bounding Approach for Optimal Appointment Scheduling , 2003 .

[21]  D. Sharp,et al.  Patient, hospital, and general practitioner characteristics associated with non-attendance: a cohort study. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[22]  Osman Balci,et al.  Modeling and analyzing a physician clinic environment using discrete-event (visual) simulation , 2001, Comput. Oper. Res..

[23]  Amy Hing-Ling Lau,et al.  A fast procedure for computing the total system cost of an appointment schedule for medical and kindred facilities , 2000 .

[24]  M. Sandelowski Focus on Research Methods Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? , 2022 .

[25]  Thomas R. Rohleder,et al.  Using client-variance information to improve dynamic appointment scheduling performance , 2000 .

[26]  F Dexter,et al.  Design of appointment systems for preanesthesia evaluation clinics to minimize patient waiting times: a review of computer simulation and patient survey studies. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[27]  Xiaoming Liu,et al.  Block appointment systems for outpatient clinics with multiple doctors , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[28]  Kum Khiong Yang,et al.  A new appointment rule for a single-server, multiple-customer service system , 1998 .

[29]  P. Patrick Wang,et al.  Optimally scheduling N customer arrival times for a single-server system , 1997, Comput. Oper. Res..

[30]  Thomas R. Rohleder,et al.  Scheduling outpatient appointments in a dynamic environment , 1996 .

[31]  D. Stokols Translating Social Ecological Theory into Guidelines for Community Health Promotion , 1996, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[32]  M. Sandelowski Sample size in qualitative research. , 1995, Research in nursing & health.

[33]  P. Patrick Wang,et al.  Static and dynamic scheduling of customer arrivals to a single‐server system , 1993 .

[34]  David Worthington,et al.  The finite capacity multi-server queue with inhomogeneous arrival rate and discrete service time distribution — and its application to continuous service time problems , 1991 .

[35]  Elliott N. Weiss,et al.  Models for Determining Estimated Start Times and Case Orderings In Hospital Operating Rooms , 1990 .

[36]  K. Glanz,et al.  An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs , 1988, Health education quarterly.

[37]  H G Dove,et al.  The Usefulness of Patients' Individual Characteristics in Predicting No-Shows in Outpatient Clinics , 1981, Medical care.

[38]  P. Adelson,et al.  Lead Time to Appointment and No-Show Rates for New and Follow-up Patients in an Ambulatory Clinic , 2017, The health care manager.