Measurement-based characterization of LOS and NLOS drone-to-ground channels

The last few years have seen a rapid growth in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based innovations and technologies, particularly for smaller drones. The rapid response to natural disasters, high data rate access in public safety situations, and the robustness of long-haul communication relays are highly dependent on airborne communication networks. A more precise channel characterization of air-to-ground links is imperative to establish these drone-based communication networks. However, there have been very limited efforts to understand the unique propagation channels encountered in drone-based communications, especially for wideband beamforming systems. In this paper, we perform a measurement-driven study to characterize air-to-ground wireless channels between UAV platforms and terrestrial users in practical Line of Sight (LOS) and Non Line of Sight (NLOS) scenarios across a wide range of carrier frequencies, including cellular (900 MHz and 1800 MHz), and WiFi (5 GHz) frequency bands. Furthermore, we investigate the feasibility of drone-based beamforming using IEEE 802.11-like signaling. We find that the drone-to-ground path loss differences are frequency dependent and closely related to drone altitude. The drone-based beamforming system can improve throughput significantly over IEEE 802.11 SISO schemes with select carrier frequencies in both LOS and NLOS scenarios up to 73.6% and 120.1%, respectively. Since our study spans many critical frequency bands, these results serve as a fundamental step towards understanding drone-to-ground communications and impact of beamforming-based applications in future aerial networks.

[1]  Yi Zheng,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Pathloss and Fading for Air-Ground Link of HAPs within a Network Simulator , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery.

[2]  R. Heath,et al.  Limited feedback unitary precoding for spatial multiplexing systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  David W. Matolak,et al.  Air-ground channel characterization for unmanned aircraft systems: The near-urban environment , 2015, MILCOM 2015 - 2015 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[4]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Performance of Conjugate and Zero-Forcing Beamforming in Large-Scale Antenna Systems , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Yan Shi,et al.  A Measurement Study of User-Induced Propagation Effects for UHF Frequency Bands , 2017, 2017 14th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON).

[8]  Jeffrey H. Reed,et al.  A geometric air-to-ground radio channel model , 2002, MILCOM 2002. Proceedings.

[9]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  A MIMO Radio Channel Model for Low-Altitude Air-to-Ground Communication Systems , 2015, 2015 IEEE 82nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2015-Fall).

[10]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[11]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[12]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Limited feedback precoding for spatial multiplexing systems , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[13]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Help from the Sky: Leveraging UAVs for Disaster Management , 2017, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[14]  Yan Shi.  Improving the performance of RSS detection using wireless open-source platforms , 2015, 2015 Texas Symposium on Wireless and Microwave Circuits and Systems (WMCS).

[15]  Mi Zhou,et al.  Airborne WiFi networks through directional antennae: An experimental study , 2015, 2015 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).