Title : Uncovering neural independent components from highly artifactual TMS-evoked EEG data Year : 2012 Version : Post print

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with electroencephalography (EEG) is a powerful tool for studying cortical excitability and connectivity. To enhance the EEG interpretation, independent component analysis (ICA) has been used to separate the data into independent components (ICs). However, TMS can evoke large artifacts in EEG, which may greatly distort the ICA separation. The removal of such artifactual EEG from the data is a difficult task. In this paper we study how badly the large artifacts distort the ICA separation, and whether the distortions could be avoided without removing the artifacts. We first show that in the ICA separation the time courses of the ICs are not affected by the large artifacts, but their topographies could be greatly distorted. Next, we show how this distortion can be circumvented. We introduce a novel technique of suppression, by which the EEG data are modified so that the ICA separation of the suppressed data becomes reliable. The suppression, instead of removing the artifactual EEG, rescales all the data to about the same magnitude as the neural EEG. For the suppressed data, ICA returns the original time courses, but instead of the original topographies, it returns modified ones, which can be used, e.g., for the source localization. We present three suppression methods based on principal component analysis, wavelet analysis, and whitening of the data matrix, respectively. We test the methods with numerical simulations. The results show that the suppression improves the source localization.

[1]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2014, Neuromethods.

[2]  Risto J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Projecting out muscle artifacts from TMS-evoked EEG , 2011, NeuroImage.

[3]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals the content of visual short-term memory in the visual cortex , 2010, NeuroImage.

[4]  S. Slobounov,et al.  Alteration of Cortical Functional Connectivity as a Result of Traumatic Brain Injury Revealed by Graph Theory, ICA, and sLORETA Analyses of EEG Signals , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Giulio Tononi,et al.  Brain responses evoked by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: An event-related potential study , 2010, Brain Stimulation.

[6]  Srikantan S. Nagarajan,et al.  Source Localization of EEG/MEG Data by Correlating Columns of ICA and Lead Field Matrices , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Seungjin Choi,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2009, Handbook of Natural Computing.

[8]  Matti Stenroos,et al.  A Matlab library for solving quasi-static volume conduction problems using the boundary element method , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[9]  R. J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation produces intensity-dependent EEG responses in humans , 2005, NeuroImage.

[10]  Risto J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Distinct differences in cortical reactivity of motor and prefrontal cortices to magnetic stimulation , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  H. Adeli,et al.  Analysis of EEG records in an epileptic patient using wavelet transform , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[13]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[14]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[15]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  A. Barker,et al.  NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX , 1985, The Lancet.