PRISM: Patient Response Identifiers for Stratified Medicine

Pharmaceutical companies continue to seek innovative ways to explore whether a drug under development is likely to be suitable for all or only an identifiable stratum of patients in the target population. The sooner this can be done during the clinical development process, the better it is for the company, and downstream for prescribers, payers, and most importantly, for patients. To help enable this vision of stratified medicine, we describe a powerful statistical framework, Patient Response Identifiers for Stratified Medicine (PRISM), for the discovery of potential predictors of drug response and associated subgroups using machine learning tools. PRISM is highly flexible and can have many "configurations", allowing the incorporation of complementary models or tools for a variety of outcomes and settings. One promising PRISM configuration is to use the observed outcomes for subgroup identification, while using counterfactual within-patient predicted treatment differences for subgroup-specific treatment estimates and associated interpretation. This separates the "subgroup-identification" from the "decision-making" and, to facilitate clinical design planning, is a simple way to obtain unbiased treatment effect sizes in the discovered subgroups. Simulation results, along with data from a real clinical trial are used to illustrate the utility of the proposed PRISM framework.

[1]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Bump hunting in high-dimensional data , 1999, Stat. Comput..

[2]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[3]  Haoda Fu,et al.  Identification of subgroups with differential treatment effects for longitudinal and multiresponse variables , 2016, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Hemant Ishwaran,et al.  Estimating Individual Treatment Effect in Observational Data Using Random Forest Methods , 2017, Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America.

[5]  W. Loh,et al.  A regression tree approach to identifying subgroups with differential treatment effects , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  Mark R. Trusheim,et al.  Stratified medicine: strategic and economic implications of combining drugs and clinical biomarkers , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[7]  Xiaogang Su,et al.  Subgroup Analysis via Recursive Partitioning , 2009 .

[8]  Min Zhang,et al.  Estimating optimal treatment regimes from a classification perspective , 2012, Stat.

[9]  M. Mahoney,et al.  Bezlotoxumab for the prevention of Clostridium difficile infection: a review of current evidence and safety profile , 2018, Infection and drug resistance.

[10]  I. Lipkovich,et al.  Tutorial in biostatistics: data‐driven subgroup identification and analysis in clinical trials , 2017, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  Marc Ratkovic,et al.  Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation , 2013, 1305.5682.

[12]  Antonio Ciampi,et al.  Tree-structured subgroup analysis for censored survival data: Validation of computationally inexpensive model selection criteria , 2005, Stat. Comput..

[13]  B. Carlin,et al.  A Bayesian credible subgroups approach to identifying patient subgroups with positive treatment effects , 2016, Biometrics.

[14]  Hemant Ishwaran,et al.  Standard errors and confidence intervals for variable importance in random forest regression, classification, and survival , 2018, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  David Bourque,et al.  Association of Patient Characteristics and Tumor Genomics With Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Using a Clinicogenomic Database , 2019, JAMA.

[16]  J. M. Taylor,et al.  Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Stefan Wager,et al.  Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests , 2015, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[18]  S. Murphy,et al.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES. , 2011, Annals of statistics.

[19]  P. Richard Hahn,et al.  Bayesian Regression Tree Models for Causal Inference: Regularization, Confounding, and Heterogeneous Effects , 2017, 1706.09523.

[20]  I. Lipkovich,et al.  Subgroup identification based on differential effect search—A recursive partitioning method for establishing response to treatment in patient subpopulations , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Model-Based Recursive Partitioning for Subgroup Analyses , 2016, The international journal of biostatistics.

[22]  K. Hornik,et al.  Model-Based Recursive Partitioning , 2008 .

[23]  C. Begg,et al.  Basket Trials in Oncology: A Trade-Off Between Complexity and Efficiency , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Ilya Lipkovich,et al.  Strategies for Identifying Predictive Biomarkers and Subgroups with Enhanced Treatment Effect in Clinical Trials Using SIDES , 2014, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[25]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[26]  K. Hornik,et al.  Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework , 2006 .

[27]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Drug development in the era of precision medicine , 2017, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[28]  Xiaogang Su,et al.  Interaction Trees with Censored Survival Data , 2008, The international journal of biostatistics.

[29]  M Nurminen,et al.  Comparative analysis of two rates. , 1985, Statistics in medicine.

[30]  Matthew Sims,et al.  Bezlotoxumab for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection. , 2017 .

[31]  Marie Davidian,et al.  Doubly robust estimation of causal effects. , 2011, American journal of epidemiology.