Fixation point offsets facilitate endogenous saccades

Subjects produced saccades to continuously visible targets that were signaled by the pitch, not the location, of an auditory signal. Such endogenous saccades were initiated more quickly when the visual fixation point disappeared 200 msec before the signal (thus producing a “gap”), even though the alerting benefits of such a warning were eliminated by an earlier warning tone. The presence of the gap effect under these circumstances shows that the effect is more general than was previously believed: Visual fixation point offsets facilitate saccades by affecting oculomotor processes related to both visually elicited (exogenous) and centrally produced (endogenous) saccades. In addition, the magnitude of the gap effect for endogenous saccades was significantly smaller than that for exogenous saccades, suggesting that at least some of the effect arises in relatively early processes, such as those involved in the processing of sensory signals, and not exclusively in later processes, such as those involved in the preparation and production of saccades.

[1]  R. Rafal,et al.  The neurology of inhibition: Integrating controlled and automatic processes. , 1994 .

[2]  M G Saslow,et al.  Latency for saccadic eye movement. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  H. Bekkering,et al.  The gap effect for eye and hand movements , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The effect of frontal eye field and superior colliculus lesions on saccadic latencies in the rhesus monkey. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Visual offsets facilitate saccadic latency: Does predisengagement of visuospatial attention mediate this gap effect? , 1993 .

[6]  Peter Lennie,et al.  A speed/accuracy tradeoff in saccadic latency , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  The reduction of saccadic latency by prior offset of the fixation point: An analysis of the gap effect , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  W. Werner,et al.  Neurons in the Primate Superior Colliculus are Active Before and During Arm Movements to Visual Targets , 1993, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  R. Klein,et al.  What are human express saccades? , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  S M Ross,et al.  Saccade latency and warning signals: Effects of auditory and visual stimulus onset and offset , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[13]  W. Fries.  Inputs from motor and premotor cortex to the superior colliculus of the macaque monkey , 1985, Behavioural Brain Research.

[14]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  The Magnitude of the Fixation Offset Effect with Endogenously and Exogenously Controlled Saccades , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Fixation-point offsets reduce the latency of saccades to acoustic targets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.