Experimental evaluation of a co-planar airborne separation display

An experiment was conducted to evaluate a concept for a co-planar self-separation display. The display shows performance and traffic constraints on maneuvering, as well as interactions of constraints between the two planar projections. In the experiment, a comparison was made between the new concept and a comparable display that did not show these interactions. Results showed that although pilots performed well with either display, performance was consistently better with the full display. Similar to previous studies, a preference for single-axis maneuvers was found, although this effect was smaller for difficult scenarios. A type of behavior persistent to constraint-based displays was also observed in this experiment: Pilots maneuver close to the constraint boundary, which can have an impact on safety when judgment errors are made.

[1]  Summer L. Brandt,et al.  The Impact of Automation Assisted Aircraft Separation on Situation Awareness , 2009, HCI.

[2]  Joost Ellerbroek,et al.  Evaluation of a Separation Assistance Display in a Multi-Actor Experiment , 2011 .

[3]  Darwin P. Hunt,et al.  The concept of knowledge and how to measure it , 2003 .

[4]  John Uhlarik,et al.  A Review of Situation Awareness Literature Relevant to Pilot Surveillance Functions , 2002 .

[5]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[6]  D A Norman,et al.  The 'problem' with automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not 'over-automation'. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Pilot Maneuver Choice and Workload in Free Flight , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Functional Interface Design for the Modern Aircraft Cockpit , 1999 .

[9]  Ann M. Bisantz,et al.  Measuring the Fit between Human Judgments and Automated Alerting Algorithms: A Study of Collision Detection , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[10]  M. M. van Paassen,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Vertical Separation Assistance Display , 2008 .

[11]  René van Paassen,et al.  Ecological Interface Design of a Tactical Airborne Separation Assistance Tool , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[12]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[13]  D. M. Henderson Applied Cartesian Tensors for Aerospace Simulations , 2006 .

[14]  René van Paassen,et al.  Design of an airborne three-dimensional separation assistance display , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[15]  Vincent Mouillet,et al.  BADA: An advanced aircraft performance model for present and future ATM systems , 2010 .

[16]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[17]  Max Mulder,et al.  Design and Simulator Evaluation of an Ecological Synthetic Vision Display , 2010 .

[18]  Sidney Dekker On the other side of promise. What should we automate today , 2004 .

[19]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Perspective and Coplanar Cockpit Displays of Traffic Information: Implications for Maneuver Choice, Flight Safety, and Mental Workload , 2005 .

[20]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Visualization of conflicts and resolutions in a "Free Flight" scenario , 1999, Proceedings Visualization '99 (Cat. No.99CB37067).

[21]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[22]  Jacco M. Hoekstra,et al.  Designing for safety: the 'free flight' air traffic management concept , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  T. Inagaki,et al.  Design of human–machine interactions in light of domain-dependence of human-centered automation , 2006, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[24]  John M. Flach,et al.  Situation Awareness: Proceed with Caution , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[25]  René van Paassen,et al.  Design of a Coplanar Airborne Separation Display , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[26]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Pilot Interaction With Cockpit Automation: Operational Experiences With the Flight Management System , 1992 .

[27]  Vernol Battiste,et al.  Development and Integration of Human-Centered Conflict Detection and Resolution Tools for Airborne Autonomous Operations , 2005 .

[28]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..