Geometric Phase Control of Surface Plasmons by Dipole Sources

Geometric phase metasurfaces, as one of the main branches of meta‐optics, have attracted enormous interest in the last two decades. Recently, through rotating a set of subwavelength dipole sources, geometric phase concept has been extended to near‐field regime for the control of surface plasmons (SPs). Despite this progress, puzzles and shortcomings still exist: it is curious that geometric phases equal to once and twice the rotation angle of dipole source are both reported for SP controls, and the control strategies examined thus far only work for a single wavelength. Hereby, a rigorous derivation of the SP excitation of dipole sources upon circularly polarized illumination is performed, and the rotation dependence and in‐plane coordinate correlation of geometric phase control of SPs is clarified. Moreover, a holographic approach is proposed to implement multiplexed geometric phase control, experimentally demonstrating several metalenses that can couple and steer the incident circular polarizations of four wavelengths and two spin directions to different SP focusing beams. This work will pave an avenue toward the development of integrated and multiplexed SP devices.

[1]  Weili Zhang,et al.  Spin‐Decoupled Interference Metasurfaces for Complete Complex‐Vectorial‐Field Control and Five‐Channel Imaging , 2022, Advanced science.

[2]  Qun Wu,et al.  Deep learning-enabled compact optical trigonometric operator with metasurface , 2022, PhotoniX.

[3]  Jian Liu,et al.  Single-layer spatial analog meta-processor for imaging processing , 2022, Nature Communications.

[4]  Weili Zhang,et al.  Tailorable Polarization‐Dependent Directional Coupling of Surface Plasmons , 2022, Advanced Functional Materials.

[5]  Dezhuan Han,et al.  Polarization-controlled generation and superposition of surface plasmon polariton vortices with a plasmonic metasurface , 2021, Applied Physics Letters.

[6]  Jonathan A. Fan,et al.  Optical meta-waveguides for integrated photonics and beyond , 2021, Light, science & applications.

[7]  C. Jisha,et al.  Geometric Phase in Optics: From Wavefront Manipulation to Waveguiding , 2021, Laser & Photonics Reviews.

[8]  Ting Xu,et al.  Multifunctional metasurfaces enabled by simultaneous and independent control of phase and amplitude for orthogonal polarization states , 2021, Light, science & applications.

[9]  Dapeng Wang,et al.  Spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in symmetric dielectric nanorings , 2021 .

[10]  H. P. Urbach,et al.  Plasmonic tweezers: for nanoscale optical trapping and beyond , 2021, Light, science & applications.

[11]  Li Li,et al.  Metalens for Generating a Customized Vectorial Focal Curve. , 2021, Nano letters.

[12]  M. Orenstein,et al.  Functional Meta Lenses for Compound Plasmonic Vortex Field Generation and Control. , 2021, Nano letters.

[13]  Hua Cheng,et al.  Multidimensional manipulation of wave fields based on artificial microstructures , 2020 .

[14]  Jiubin Tan,et al.  Polarization‐Engineered Noninterleaved Metasurface for Integer and Fractional Orbital Angular Momentum Multiplexing , 2020, Laser & Photonics Reviews.

[15]  P. Genevet,et al.  Independent phase modulation for quadruplex polarization channels enabled by chirality-assisted geometric-phase metasurfaces , 2020, Nature Communications.

[16]  Shulin Sun,et al.  Excite Spoof Surface Plasmons with Tailored Wavefronts Using High‐Efficiency Terahertz Metasurfaces , 2020, Advanced science.

[17]  G. Agarwal,et al.  Metasurfaces for quantum photonics , 2020, Nature Photonics.

[18]  Shulin Sun,et al.  Helicity-delinked manipulations on surface waves and propagating waves by metasurfaces , 2020 .

[19]  W. T. Chen,et al.  Flat optics with dispersion-engineered metasurfaces , 2020, Nature Reviews Materials.

[20]  Cunlin Zhang,et al.  Spin-Decoupled Multifunctional Metasurface for Asymmetric Polarization Generation , 2019, ACS Photonics.

[21]  G. Si,et al.  On-Chip Photonic Spin Hall Lens , 2019, ACS Photonics.

[22]  Hua Cheng,et al.  Energy‐Tailorable Spin‐Selective Multifunctional Metasurfaces with Full Fourier Components , 2019, Advanced materials.

[23]  Yan Peng,et al.  Manipulating Terahertz Plasmonic Vortex Based on Geometric and Dynamic Phase , 2018, Advanced Optical Materials.

[24]  Xing Zhu,et al.  Spin‐Controlled Integrated Near‐ and Far‐Field Optical Launcher , 2018 .

[25]  Lei Zhou,et al.  High-efficiency chirality-modulated spoof surface plasmon meta-coupler , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[26]  W. T. Chen,et al.  Metalenses at visible wavelengths: Diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging , 2016, Science.

[27]  Byoungho Lee,et al.  A double‐lined metasurface for plasmonic complex‐field generation , 2016 .

[28]  Ady Arie,et al.  Surface‐plasmon wavefront and spectral shaping by near‐field holography , 2016 .

[29]  Lei Zhou,et al.  High-efficiency surface plasmon meta-couplers: concept and microwave-regime realizations , 2016, Light: Science & Applications.

[30]  Zhen Tian,et al.  Anomalous Surface Wave Launching by Handedness Phase Control , 2015, Advanced materials.

[31]  Hui Liu,et al.  Flexible coherent control of plasmonic spin-Hall effect , 2015, Nature Communications.

[32]  Lei Zhou,et al.  Photonic Spin Hall Effect with Nearly 100% Efficiency , 2015 .

[33]  Zhen Tian,et al.  Mapping the near-field propagation of surface plasmons on terahertz metasurfaces , 2015 .

[34]  Mengtao Sun,et al.  Nanoplasmonic waveguides: towards applications in integrated nanophotonic circuits , 2015, Light: Science & Applications.

[35]  F. J. Rodríguez-Fortuño,et al.  Spin–orbit interactions of light , 2015, Nature Photonics.

[36]  Daniel Wintz,et al.  Controlled steering of Cherenkov surface plasmon wakes with a one-dimensional metamaterial , 2015, 2015 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[37]  Guoxing Zheng,et al.  Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency. , 2015, Nature nanotechnology.

[38]  Daniel Wintz,et al.  Holographic metalens for switchable focusing of surface plasmons. , 2015, Nano letters.

[39]  Andrea Alù,et al.  Ultrathin Pancharatnam–Berry Metasurface with Maximal Cross‐Polarization Efficiency , 2015, Advanced materials.

[40]  P. Genevet,et al.  Holographic optical metasurfaces: a review of current progress , 2015, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[41]  Jing Yang,et al.  Broadband surface plasmon polariton directional coupling via asymmetric optical slot nanoantenna pair. , 2014, Nano letters.

[42]  Federico Capasso,et al.  Nanostructured holograms for broadband manipulation of vector beams. , 2013, Nano letters.

[43]  F. Capasso,et al.  Polarization-Controlled Tunable Directional Coupling of Surface Plasmon Polaritons , 2013, Science.

[44]  Qiaofeng Tan,et al.  Helicity dependent directional surface plasmon polariton excitation using a metasurface with interfacial phase discontinuity , 2013, Light: Science & Applications.

[45]  Guofan Jin,et al.  Dispersionless phase discontinuities for controlling light propagation. , 2012, Nano letters.

[46]  Xiang Zhang,et al.  Compact magnetic antennas for directional excitation of surface plasmons. , 2012, Nano letters.

[47]  Xiang Zhang,et al.  Toward integrated plasmonic circuits , 2012 .

[48]  Shulin Sun,et al.  Gradient-index meta-surfaces as a bridge linking propagating waves and surface waves. , 2012, Nature materials.

[49]  Takuo Tanemura,et al.  Multiple-wavelength focusing of surface plasmons with a nonperiodic nanoslit coupler. , 2011, Nano letters.

[50]  X. D. Hoa,et al.  Towards integrated and sensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensors: a review of recent progress. , 2007, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[51]  S. Maier Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications , 2007 .

[52]  W. Barnes,et al.  Surface plasmon subwavelength optics , 2003, Nature.

[53]  J. Homola Present and future of surface plasmon resonance biosensors , 2003, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.