Relationship between intra-operative vein graft treatment with DuraGraft® or saline and clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting

ABSTRACT Background: Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) remain the most often used conduits for coronary bypass grafting (CABG). Progressive intimal hyperplasia contributes to vein-graft disease and vein-graft failure (VGF). We compared the impact of intraoperative preservation of SVGs in a storage solution (DuraGraft®) versus heparinized saline on VGF-related outcomes after CABG. Methods: From 1996 to 2004, 2436 patients underwent isolated CABG with ≥ 1 SVG. SVGs were consecutively treated with DuraGraft in 1036 patients (2001−2004) and heparinized saline in 1400 patients (1996−1999). Short- (< 30 days) and long-term (≥ 1000 days) outcomes were assessed using repeat revascularization (primary end point), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) consisting of the composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization. Results: Mean follow-up in the DuraGraft group was 8.5 ± 4.2 years and 9.9 ± 5.6 years in controls. Short-term event rates were low and generally did not differ between groups. DuraGraft was associated with a 45% lower occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction after 1000 days (hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.41−0.74; P < 0.0001). There was 35% and 19% lower long-term risk for revascularization (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44−0.97; P = 0.037) and MACE (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70−0.94; P = 0.0051), respectively, after DuraGraft. Mortality was comparable between both groups at 1, 5, and 10 years. There was no statistically significant association between DuraGraft exposure and time to death starting at 30 or 1000 days (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76−1.09; P = 0.29). Conclusion: In this study, intraoperative treatment of SVGs with DuraGraft was associated with a lower risk of long-term adverse events suggesting that efficient intraoperative SVG treatment may reduce VGF-related complications post-CABG. These data warrant randomized clinical trials to validate these findings.

[1]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[2]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2018, European heart journal.

[3]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  DuraGraft vascular conduit preservation solution in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: rationale and design of a within-patient randomised multicentre trial , 2018, Open Heart.

[4]  J. Jukema,et al.  Vein graft failure: from pathophysiology to clinical outcomes , 2016, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[5]  T. Carrel,et al.  Graft preservation solutions in cardiovascular surgery. , 2016, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[6]  E. Stuart,et al.  Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies , 2015, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  C. Brophy,et al.  Preservation solution impacts physiologic function and cellular viability of human saphenous vein graft. , 2015, Surgery.

[8]  R. Lopes,et al.  The Preservation and Handling of Vein Grafts in Current Surgical Practice: Findings of a Survey Among Cardiovascular Surgeons of Top-Ranked US Hospitals. , 2015, JAMA surgery.

[9]  F. de Robertis,et al.  A Randomized Trial of External Stenting for Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. , 2015, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  R. Califf,et al.  Vein graft preservation solutions, patency, and outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: follow-up from the PREVENT IV randomized clinical trial. , 2014, JAMA surgery.

[11]  C. Brophy,et al.  Pressure control during preparation of saphenous veins. , 2014, JAMA surgery.

[12]  Robbert J de Winter,et al.  Saphenous vein graft failure and clinical outcomes: toward a surrogate end point in patients following coronary artery bypass surgery? , 2013, American heart journal.

[13]  R. D. de Winter,et al.  Saphenous Vein Graft Failure After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Pathophysiology, Management, and Future Directions , 2013, Annals of surgery.

[14]  D. Whellan,et al.  Saphenous Vein Graft Disease: Review of Pathophysiology, Prevention, and Treatment , 2013, Cardiology in review.

[15]  M. Tsakok,et al.  Storage of saphenous vein grafts prior to coronary artery bypass grafting: is autologous whole blood more effective than saline in preserving graft function? , 2012, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[16]  J. Cremer,et al.  Highly flexible nitinol mesh to encase aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts: first clinical experiences and angiographic results nine months postoperatively. , 2011, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[17]  S. Tugtekin,et al.  Even short-time storage in physiological saline solution impairs endothelial vascular function of saphenous vein grafts. , 2011, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[18]  Brian K. Lee,et al.  Weight Trimming and Propensity Score Weighting , 2011, PloS one.

[19]  D. Reda,et al.  Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial. , 2011, JAMA.

[20]  S. Nees,et al.  Extensive deendothelialization and thrombogenicity in routinely prepared vein grafts for coronary bypass operations: facts and remedy. , 2009, International journal of clinical and experimental medicine.

[21]  Prevent Iv Investigators Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005 .

[22]  S. Khuri,et al.  Multi-photon microscopic evaluation of saphenous vein endothelium and its preservation with a new solution, GALA. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[23]  S. Khuri,et al.  The coronary artery bypass conduit: I. Intraoperative endothelial injury and its implication on graft patency. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[24]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization , 2014 .

[25]  R. Califf,et al.  Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.