Can primary prevention or selective screening for melanoma be more precisely targeted through general practice? A prospective study to validate a self administered risk score

Abstract Objectives: To establish whether a questionnaire incorporating MacKie's risk factor flow chart can identify patients at high risk for melanoma so that they can be targeted for primary and secondary prevention. To validate the risk score derived from the questionnaire and test the feasibility of self completion by comparing patients' self reported skin characteristics with a skin examination performed by an experienced general practitioner. Design: Prospective questionnaire survey followed by a comparative study. Setting: 16 randomly selected group practices in a health district in Cheshire, United Kingdom. Subjects: Questionnaire survey—3105 consecutive patients aged 16 years and over attending for a primary care consultation; comparative study—a self selected subsample of 388 of the 3105 patients. Main outcome measures: MacKie risk group for melanoma. Comparison of high risk skin characteristics reported by patients and those noted during a skin examination by a doctor (κ statistic). Results: 4.3% of patients (87% women) were in the highest risk group and 4.4% (79% men) were in the second highest risk group, as defined by the MacKie score. Agreement between patients' self appraisal of skin characteristics and clinical skin examinations was reflected in κ values of 0.67 for freckles, 0.60 for moles, and 0.43 for atypical naevi. Conclusion: This questionnaire helped to identify a group at high risk for melanoma. Furthermore, good agreement was found when the patient's risk scores were compared with results of the clinical skin examination. This risk score is potentially useful in targeting primary and secondary prevention of melanoma through general practice. Key messages Successful treatment of melanoma depends on its early diagnosis and excision The MacKie risk factors score flow chart was used to identify a group of patients at high risk of melanoma from a sample of general practice patients who had completed a questionnaire A good measure of agreement was achieved when self appraisal of high risk skin characteristics by patients was compared with a clinical skin examination A self report risk score is a feasible means of identifying high risk patients and targeting prevention of melanoma

[1]  Jacques Estève,et al.  Trends in cancer incidence and mortality. , 2009 .

[2]  J. Hunter,et al.  Cutaneous malignant melanoma in Scotland: incidence, survival, and mortality, 1979-94 , 1997, BMJ.

[3]  B. Dowling.  Effect of fundholding on waiting times: database study , 1997, BMJ.

[4]  L. Beecham.  GP fundholders can no longer jump the queue , 1997 .

[5]  P. Little,et al.  Self screening for risk of melanoma: validity of self mole counting by patients in a single general practice , 1995, BMJ.

[6]  A. Jackson.  Prevention, early detection and team management of skin cancer in primary care: contribution to The health of the nation objectives. , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[7]  D. Mant,et al.  Role of primary care in the prevention of malignant melanoma. , 1994, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  J. Dixon,et al.  Distribution of NHS funds between fundholding and non-fundholding practices , 1994, BMJ.

[9]  J. Dixon.  Can there be fair funding for fundholding practices? , 1994, BMJ.

[10]  J. Elwood.  Screening for Melanoma and Options For-Its Evaluation , 1994, Journal of medical screening.

[11]  J. Morris,et al.  Screening for Malignant Melanoma , 1994, Journal of medical screening.

[12]  R. Sanson-Fisher,et al.  Reliability of naevus counts in identifying individuals at high risk of malignant melanoma , 1994, The British journal of dermatology.

[13]  M. Roland,et al.  Understanding variation in rates of referral among general practitioners: are inappropriate referrals important and would guidelines help to reduce rates? , 1993, BMJ.

[14]  M. G. Cook,et al.  Are pigmented lesion clinics worthwhile? , 1993, The British journal of dermatology.

[15]  C. Balch,et al.  Think Melanoma , 1993, Southern medical journal.

[16]  T. Sheldon,et al.  Weighting in the dark: resource allocation in the new NHS. , 1993, BMJ.

[17]  I. Mackenzie,et al.  Deaths from haemolytic disease of the newborn. , 1992, BMJ.

[18]  J. Lockie.  Postoperative pain control in children , 1992 .

[19]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Economics, Organization and Management , 1992 .

[20]  A. Burden.  The Challenges of Medical Practice Variations , 1991 .

[21]  E. Higgins,et al.  MALIGNANT MELANOMA — A REVIEW: EARLY DIAGNOSIS IS THE KEY , 1991, The British journal of clinical practice.

[22]  I. F. Greatorex.  The Challenges of Medical Practice Variations , 1991 .

[23]  R. MacKie,et al.  Clinical recognition of early invasive malignant melanoma. , 1990, BMJ.

[24]  A. Coulter,et al.  Relation between general practices' outpatient referral rates and rates of elective admission to hospital. , 1990, BMJ.

[25]  D. Shaw,et al.  The initial effects on workload and outcome of a public education campaign on early diagnosis and treatment of malignant melanoma in Leicestershire , 1990, The British journal of dermatology.

[26]  R. MacKie,et al.  PERSONAL RISK-FACTOR CHART FOR CUTANEOUS MELANOMA , 1989, The Lancet.

[27]  G. Bevan.  Reforming UK health care: internal markets or emergent planning? , 1989 .

[28]  R. MacKie,et al.  Experience of a public education programme on early detection of cutaneous malignant melanoma. , 1988, BMJ.

[29]  S. Nichols.  Medicine and the Media: Effect of a public campaign about malignant melanoma on general practitioner workload in Southampton , 1988, British medical journal.

[30]  C. J. O'doherty,et al.  Site‐specific melanocytic naevus counts as predictors of whole body naevi , 1988, The British journal of dermatology.

[31]  P Paul-Shaheen,et al.  Small area analysis: a review and analysis of the North American literature. , 1987, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[32]  G. Bevan,et al.  Reviewing RAWP. Variations in admission rates: implications for equitable allocation of resources. , 1987, British medical journal.

[33]  G. Bevan,et al.  Financial incentives of subregional RAWP. , 1987, British medical journal.

[34]  P. Caper.  The epidemiologic surveillance of medical care. , 1987, American journal of public health.

[35]  J. Freeman,et al.  ARE HOSPITAL SERVICES RATIONED IN NEW HAVEN OR OVER-UTILISED IN BOSTON? , 1987, The Lancet.

[36]  J. Wennberg.  On patient need, equity, supplier-induced demand, and the need to assess the outcome of common medical practices. , 1985 .

[37]  R. G. Bevan.  Organising the finance of hospitals by simulated markets , 1984 .

[38]  G. Teeling-Smith.  Health care: Priorities and management , 1982 .

[39]  G. Bevan.  Resource allocation within Health Authorities : lessons from total purchasing pilots , 1998 .

[40]  N. Mays,et al.  Geographical resource allocation in the English National Health Service, 1971-1994: the tension between normative and empirical approaches. , 1995, International journal of epidemiology.

[41]  D. Fleming,et al.  An examination of practice referral rates in relation to practice structure, patient demography and case mix. , 1991, Health trends.

[42]  Surveys.,et al.  Standard occupational classification , 1990 .

[43]  D. Fleming,et al.  General practitioner referrals to hospital: the financial implications of variability. , 1988, Health trends.

[44]  C. Webster.  Problems of health care : the National Health Service before 1957 , 1988 .

[45]  E. Cox.  Prognostic factors in malignant melanoma , 1982 .

[46]  P. G. Keates.  What the doctor ordered. , 1971, The British journal of radiology.

[47]  Patrick Rivett,et al.  Introduction to operations research , 1968 .

[48]  Ja Wilson,et al.  Principles and practice of screening for disease , 1968 .

[49]  King Edward's Hospital Fund for London. , 1902, British medical journal.