Ceiling smoke front velocity in a tunnel with central mechanical exhaust system: Comparison of model predictions with measurements

Abstract The front velocity of transient ceiling becomes an important consideration for tunnel fire safety, which provide a prediction of travel time of ceiling jet. The previous model predictions of ceiling jet front velocity were developed in a natural ventilation tunnel. The effect of central mechanical exhaust system on the ceiling jet front velocity have not been revealed in the past. This work experimentally revealed smoke front velocity of ceiling jet in a tunnel under the effect of central mechanical exhaust system, and the relative location between fire source and central exhaust system were considered. It is found that, the relative direction of fire source and ceiling mechanical extraction opening has a great influence on the smoke front velocity of ceiling jet. Some previous models (Jones, Benjamin, and CFAST) all overestimate the smoke flow velocity of ceiling front; the predicted ceiling jet front velocity deduced by Jones and Benjamin have the maximum excessive deviation of about 60% and 98%, respectively, but the CFAST model is closer to the measurements with relatively higher front velocity. The Hinkley’s model can be well used to predict it with different central mechanical exhaust system.

[1]  K. Venkatasubbaiah,et al.  Effects of buoyancy induced roof ventilation systems for smoke removal in tunnel fires , 2014 .

[2]  Haukur Ingason,et al.  The maximum temperature of buoyancy-driven smoke flow beneath the ceiling in tunnel fires , 2011 .

[3]  R. Huo,et al.  On the front velocity of buoyancy-driven transient ceiling jet in a horizontal corridor: Comparison of correlations with measurements , 2011 .

[4]  Yasushi Oka,et al.  Control of smoke flow in tunnel fires , 1995 .

[5]  Yingli Liu,et al.  Multiple steady states of fire smoke transport in a multi-branch tunnel: Theoretical and numerical studies , 2017 .

[6]  Cheuk Lun Chow,et al.  Smoke movement in tilted tunnel fires with longitudinal ventilation , 2015 .

[7]  Futoshi Tanaka,et al.  Effects of a transverse external wind on natural ventilation during fires in shallow urban road tunnels with roof openings , 2016 .

[8]  P. Salizzoni,et al.  Aerodynamics of buoyant releases within a longitudinally ventilated tunnel , 2014 .

[9]  Haukur Ingason,et al.  Model scale tunnel fire tests with point extraction ventilation , 2011 .

[10]  R. Huo,et al.  Experimental studies on fire-induced buoyant smoke temperature distribution along tunnel ceiling , 2007 .

[11]  K. Kang,et al.  Characteristic length scale of critical ventilation velocity in tunnel smoke control , 2010 .

[12]  Olivier Vauquelin,et al.  Parametrical study of the back flow occurrence in case of a buoyant release into a rectangular channel , 2005 .

[13]  Longhua Hu,et al.  Effect of blockage-fire distance on buoyancy driven back-layering length and critical velocity in a tunnel: An experimental investigation and global correlations , 2013 .

[14]  Yingli Liu,et al.  Performance evaluation of longitudinal and transverse ventilation for thermal and smoke control in a looped urban traffic link tunnel , 2016 .

[15]  T. Benjamin.  Gravity currents and related phenomena , 1968, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  Fei Tang,et al.  Evolution characteristics of fire smoke layer thickness in a mechanical ventilation tunnel with multiple point extraction , 2017 .

[17]  Haukur Ingason,et al.  Study of critical velocity and backlayering length in longitudinally ventilated tunnel fires , 2010 .

[18]  L. J. Li,et al.  Thermal smoke back-layering flow length with ceiling extraction at upstream side of fire source in a longitudinal ventilated tunnel , 2016 .

[19]  Kai Zhu,et al.  An experimental investigation on blockage effect of metro train on the smoke back-layering in subway tunnel fires , 2016 .

[20]  J. Ji,et al.  Influence of aspect ratio of tunnel on smoke temperature distribution under ceiling in near field of fire source , 2016 .

[21]  Longhua Hu,et al.  A global model on temperature profile of buoyant ceiling gas flow in a channel with combining mass and heat loss due to ceiling extraction and longitudinal forced air flow , 2014 .

[22]  Yaping He,et al.  Smoke temperature and velocity decays along corridors , 1999 .

[23]  Wan Ki Chow,et al.  Studies on buoyancy-driven back-layering flow in tunnel fires , 2008 .

[24]  Li He,et al.  Smoke development in full-scale sloped long and large curved tunnel fires under natural ventilation , 2016 .

[25]  Yan Fu Wang,et al.  Thermal buoyant smoke back-layering length in a naturally ventilated tunnel with vertical shafts , 2016 .

[26]  Longhua Hu,et al.  Studies on buoyancy driven two-directional smoke flow layering length with combination of point extraction and longitudinal ventilation in tunnel fires , 2013 .

[27]  K. Zhu,et al.  An experimental study of temperature and heat flux in a channel with an asymmetric thermal plume , 2017 .

[28]  Longhua Hu,et al.  Characterization of buoyant flow stratification behaviors by Richardson (Froude) number in a tunnel fire with complex combination of longitudinal ventilation and ceiling extraction , 2017 .

[29]  F. Vuilleumier,et al.  Safety aspects of railway and road tunnel: example of the Lötschberg railway tunnel and Mont-Blanc road tunnel , 2002 .

[30]  C. Fan,et al.  Effect of blockage-heat source distance on maximum temperature of buoyancy-induced smoke flow beneath ceiling in a longitudinal ventilated tunnel , 2017 .

[31]  Fang Liu,et al.  Study on the critical velocity in a sloping tunnel fire under longitudinal ventilation , 2016 .

[32]  Q. Zhang,et al.  The critical condition of longitudinal emergency tunnel ventilation – Comparison of theoretical prediction with experimental data , 2012 .

[33]  Yaping He,et al.  Determination of interface height from measured parameter profile in enclosure fire experiment , 1998 .