Representation of lexical form: evidence from studies of sublexical ambiguity.

The authors examined the role of intermediate, sublexical representations in spoken word perception. In particular, they tested whether flaps, which are neutralized allophones of intervocalic /t/s and /d/s, map onto their underlying phonemic counterparts. In 2 shadowing tasks, the authors found that flaps primed their carefully articulated counterparts, and vice versa. Because none of the flapped stimuli were lexically ambiguous (e.g., between rater and raider), these results provide evidence that such priming is sublexically mediated. Therefore, the current study provides further insights into when underlying form-based representations are activated during spoken word processing. In particular, the authors argue that phonological ambiguity, inherent in their flapped stimuli, is one of the conditions leading to the activation of underlying representations.

[1]  S. Goldinger Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Paul A Luce,et al.  Representation of lexical form. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Robert A. Fox,et al.  Dental flaps, vowel duration and rule ordering in American English , 1977 .

[4]  P. Ladefoged A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[5]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[6]  J. Charles-Luce,et al.  Cognitive Factors Involved in Preserving a Phonemic Contrast , 1997, Language and speech.

[7]  Eileen C. Schwab,et al.  Pattern recognition by humans and machines , 1986 .

[8]  D. Schacter,et al.  Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Cynthia M Connine,et al.  It’s not what you hear but how often you hear it: On the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  S. Grossberg The Adaptive Self-Organization of Serial Order in Behavior: Speech, Language, And Motor Control , 1987 .

[11]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  P. Luce,et al.  Spoken Word Recognition: The Challenge of Variation , 2005 .

[13]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  C. Mclennan The Time Course of Variability Effects in the Perception of Spoken Language: Changes Across the Lifespan , 2006, Language and speech.

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  P. Luce,et al.  Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: effects of size and reflection. , 1992 .

[18]  David Patterson,et al.  Variant frequency in American English flap production , 2001 .

[19]  S. Grossberg,et al.  The resonant dynamics of speech perception: interword integration and duration-dependent backward effects. , 2000, Psychological review.