Entropic Independence II: Optimal Sampling and Concentration via Restricted Modified Log-Sobolev Inequalities

We introduce a framework for obtaining tight mixing time bounds for Markov chains based on what we call restricted modified log-Sobolev inequalities. Modified log-Sobolev inequalities quantify the rate of relative entropy contraction for the Markov operator, and are notoriously difficult to establish. However, for distributions infinitesimally close to stationarity, entropy contraction becomes equivalent to variance contraction, a.k.a. a Poincare inequality, which is significantly easier to establish through, for example, spectral analysis. Motivated by this observation, we study restricted modified log-Sobolev inequalities that guarantee entropy contraction not for all starting distributions, but for those in a large neighborhood of the stationary distribution. We use our framework to show that we can sample from the hardcore and Ising models on n-node graphs that have a constant δ relative gap to the tree-uniqueness threshold, in nearly-linear time Õδ(n). Notably, our bound does not depend on the maximum degree ∆ of the graph, and is therefore optimal even for high-degree graphs. Our work improves on prior mixing time bounds of Õδ,∆(n) and Õδ(n), established via (non-restricted) modified log-Sobolev and Poincare inequalities respectively. As an additional corollary of our results we show that optimal concentration inequalities can still be achieved from the restricted form of modified log-Sobolev inequalities. To establish restricted entropy contraction for these distributions, we extend the entropic independence framework of Anari, Jain, Koehler, Pham, and Vuong to distributions that satisfy spectral independence under a restricted set of external fields. We also develop an orthogonal trick that might be of independent interest: utilizing Bernoulli factories we show how to implement Glauber dynamics updates on high-degree graphs in O(1) time, assuming the graph is represented so that one can sample random neighbors of any desired node in O(1) time. Put together, we obtain the perhaps surprising result that we can sample from tree-unique hardcore and Ising models in time Õδ(n), i.e., without even necessarily having enough time to read all edges of the graph.

[1]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  Exact thresholds for Ising–Gibbs samplers on general graphs , 2009, The Annals of Probability.

[2]  S. Bobkov,et al.  Modified Logarithmic Sobolev Inequalities in Discrete Settings , 2006 .

[3]  Liming Wu,et al.  Poincaré and transportation inequalities for Gibbs measures under the Dobrushin uniqueness condition , 2006 .

[4]  Marian Kremers 2021 , 2021, Vakblad Sociaal Werk.

[5]  B. Zegarliński,et al.  Dobrushin uniqueness theorem and logarithmic Sobolev inequalities , 1992 .

[6]  L. A. Goldberg,et al.  Systematic scan for sampling colorings , 2006, math/0603323.

[7]  Thomas P. Hayes,et al.  Convergence of MCMC and Loopy BP in the Tree Uniqueness Region for the Hard-Core Model , 2016, 2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[8]  Lap Chi Lau,et al.  Improved analysis of higher order random walks and applications , 2020, STOC.

[9]  Eric Vigoda,et al.  Rapid Mixing of Glauber Dynamics up to Uniqueness via Contraction , 2020, 2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[10]  Boguslaw Zegarlinski,et al.  The equivalence of the logarithmic Sobolev inequality and the Dobrushin-Shlosman mixing condition , 1992 .

[11]  Eric Vigoda,et al.  Optimal mixing of Glauber dynamics: entropy factorization via high-dimensional expansion , 2021, STOC.

[12]  R. Handel Probability in High Dimension , 2014 .

[13]  Sharad Goel,et al.  Modified logarithmic Sobolev inequalities for some models of random walk , 2004 .

[14]  Nima Anari,et al.  Entropic Independence I: Modified Log-Sobolev Inequalities for Fractionally Log-Concave Distributions and High-Temperature Ising Models , 2021, 2106.04105.

[15]  M. Mézard,et al.  Spin Glass Theory And Beyond: An Introduction To The Replica Method And Its Applications , 1986 .

[16]  P. Secchi On the Nash-Moser Iteration Technique , 2016 .

[17]  K. Marton Measure concentration for Euclidean distance in the case of dependent random variables , 2004, math/0410168.

[18]  R. Dobrushin The problem of uniqueness of a gibbsian random field and the problem of phase transitions , 1968 .

[19]  Thomas P. Hayes A simple condition implying rapid mixing of single-site dynamics on spin systems , 2006, 2006 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'06).

[20]  S. Bobkov,et al.  Exponential Integrability and Transportation Cost Related to Logarithmic Sobolev Inequalities , 1999 .

[21]  Nima Anari,et al.  Log-concave polynomials II: high-dimensional walks and an FPRAS for counting bases of a matroid , 2018, STOC.

[22]  James R. Lee,et al.  Transport-Entropy Inequalities and Curvature in Discrete-Space Markov Chains , 2016, 1604.06859.

[23]  P. D. Pra,et al.  Entropy decay for interacting systems via the Bochner-Bakry-Émery approach , 2012, 1205.4599.

[24]  Tali Kaufman,et al.  High Order Random Walks: Beyond Spectral Gap , 2017, APPROX-RANDOM.

[25]  Mohit Singh,et al.  Entropy, optimization and counting , 2013, STOC.

[26]  Mike E. Davies,et al.  Iterative Hard Thresholding for Compressed Sensing , 2008, ArXiv.

[27]  Ronen Eldan,et al.  A spectral condition for spectral gap: fast mixing in high-temperature Ising models , 2020, Probability Theory and Related Fields.

[28]  Piyush Srivastava,et al.  Approximation Algorithms for Two-State Anti-Ferromagnetic Spin Systems on Bounded Degree Graphs , 2011, Journal of Statistical Physics.

[29]  V. Climenhaga Markov chains and mixing times , 2013 .

[30]  R. Dobrushin,et al.  Constructive Criterion for the Uniqueness of Gibbs Field , 1985 .

[31]  S. Gharan,et al.  Spectral Independence in High-Dimensional Expanders and Applications to the Hardcore Model , 2020, 2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[32]  Prasad Tetali,et al.  Ricci curvature bounds for weakly interacting Markov chains , 2016, 1602.05414.

[33]  Allan Sly,et al.  The Computational Hardness of Counting in Two-Spin Models on d-Regular Graphs , 2012, 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[34]  Mark Huber Optimal Linear Bernoulli Factories for Small Mean Problems , 2015, ArXiv.

[35]  Gareth O. Roberts,et al.  Simulating events of unknown probabilities via reverse time martingales , 2011, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[36]  Thomas P. Hayes,et al.  Coupling with the stationary distribution and improved sampling for colorings and independent sets , 2005, SODA '05.

[37]  Martin E. Dyer,et al.  On Counting Independent Sets in Sparse Graphs , 2002, SIAM J. Comput..

[38]  Weiming Feng,et al.  Rapid mixing of Glauber dynamics via spectral independence for all degrees , 2021, ArXiv.

[39]  Liang Li,et al.  Correlation Decay up to Uniqueness in Spin Systems , 2013, SODA.

[40]  Eric Vigoda,et al.  Inapproximability of the Partition Function for the Antiferromagnetic Ising and Hard-Core Models , 2012, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing.

[41]  K. Marton,et al.  Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities in discrete product spaces: a proof by a transportation cost distance , 2015, 1507.02803.

[42]  T. Bodineau,et al.  A very simple proof of the LSI for high temperature spin systems , 2017, Journal of Functional Analysis.

[43]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  On the hardness of sampling independent sets beyond the tree threshold , 2007, math/0701471.

[44]  O. Badawi,et al.  107 , 2019, Critical Care Medicine.

[45]  Nima Anari,et al.  Isotropy and Log-Concave Polynomials: Accelerated Sampling and High-Precision Counting of Matroid Bases , 2020, 2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[46]  Justin Salez,et al.  Modified log-Sobolev inequalities for strong-Rayleigh measures , 2019, The Annals of Applied Probability.

[47]  Prasad Tetali,et al.  Approximate tensorization of entropy at high temperature , 2014, 1405.0608.

[48]  Dror Weitz,et al.  Counting independent sets up to the tree threshold , 2006, STOC '06.

[49]  June Huh,et al.  Lorentzian polynomials , 2019, Annals of Mathematics.

[50]  Allan Sly,et al.  Computational Transition at the Uniqueness Threshold , 2010, 2010 IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[51]  Nima Anari,et al.  Fractionally log-concave and sector-stable polynomials: counting planar matchings and more , 2021, STOC.

[52]  Eric Vigoda,et al.  On Mixing of Markov Chains: Coupling, Spectral Independence, and Entropy Factorization , 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA).

[53]  A. Guillin,et al.  Transportation cost-information inequalities and applications to random dynamical systems and diffusions , 2004, math/0410172.