Establishing a Best Practice for SDTrimSP Simulations of Solar Wind Ion Sputtering

Solar wind (SW) ion irradiation on airless bodies can play an important role in altering their surface properties and surrounding exosphere. Much of the ion sputtering data needed for exosphere studies come from binary collision approximation sputtering models such as TRansport of Ions in Matter and its more recent extension, SDTrimSP. These models predict the yield and energy distribution of sputtered atoms, along with the depth of deposition and damage of the substrate, all as a function of the incoming ion type, impact energy, and impact angle. Within SDTrimSP there are several user-specific inputs that have been applied differently in previous SW ion sputtering simulations. These parameters can influence the simulated behavior of both the target and sputtered atoms. Here, we have conducted a sensitivity study into the SDTrimSP parameters in order to determine a best practice for simulating SW ion impacts onto planetary surfaces. We demonstrate that ion sputtering behavior is highly sensitive to several important input parameters including the ion impact angle and energy distribution and the ejected atom surface binding energy. Furthermore, different parameters can still result in similarities in the total sputtering yield, potentially masking large differences in other sputtering-induced behaviors such as the elemental yield, surface concentration, and damage production. Therefore, it is important to consider more than just the overall sputtering behavior when quantifying the importance of different parameters. This study serves to establish a more consistent methodology for simulations of SW-induced ion sputtering on bodies such as Mercury and the Moon, allowing for more accurate comparisons between studies.

[1]  P. Wurz,et al.  Analytical model for the sputtering of rough surfaces , 2022, Surfaces and Interfaces.

[2]  R. Killen,et al.  Solar Wind Ion Sputtering of Sodium from Silicates Using Molecular Dynamics Calculations of Surface Binding Energies , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[3]  L. Keller,et al.  Solar energetic particle tracks in lunar samples: A transmission electron microscope calibration and implications for lunar space weathering , 2021, Meteoritics & Planetary Science.

[4]  P. Wurz,et al.  Creation of Lunar and Hermean analogue mineral powder samples for solar wind irradiation experiments and mid-infrared spectra analysis , 2021 .

[5]  R. Morris,et al.  Characterizing the spectral, microstructural, and chemical effects of solar wind irradiation on the Murchison carbonaceous chondrite through coordinated analyses , 2021 .

[6]  H. Lammer,et al.  Solar wind Helium ion interaction with Mg and Fe rich pyroxene as Mercury surface analogue , 2020, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms.

[7]  H. Lammer,et al.  Dynamic Potential Sputtering of Lunar Analog Material by Solar Wind Ions , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[8]  A. Vorburger,et al.  Mercury's subsolar sodium exosphere: an ab initio calculation to interpret MASCS/UVVS observations from MESSENGER , 2019, Annales Geophysicae.

[9]  H. Lammer,et al.  Solar wind sputtering of wollastonite as a lunar analogue material – Comparisons between experiments and simulations , 2018, Icarus.

[10]  M. Fujimoto,et al.  Plasma Sources in Planetary Magnetospheres: Mercury , 2015 .

[11]  C. Dukes,et al.  The lunar surface-exosphere connection: Measurement of secondary-ions from Apollo soils , 2015 .

[12]  A. Mutzke,et al.  Simulation of ion beam sputtering with SDTrimSP, TRIDYN and SRIM , 2014 .

[13]  L. Nittler,et al.  Mercury’s Weather-Beaten Surface: Understanding Mercury in the Context of Lunar and Asteroidal Space Weathering Studies , 2014 .

[14]  V. Tenishev,et al.  Kinetic modeling of sodium in the lunar exosphere , 2013 .

[15]  P. R. Harris,et al.  Solar-Wind Protons and Heavy Ions Sputtering of Lunar Surface Materials , 2011 .

[16]  P. R. Harris,et al.  Sputtering of lunar regolith simulant by protons and singly and multicharged Ar ions at solar wind energies , 2011 .

[17]  C. Dukes,et al.  Solar wind contribution to surficial lunar water: Laboratory investigations , 2011 .

[18]  Helmut Lammer,et al.  Self-consistent modelling of Mercury's exosphere by sputtering, micro- meteorite impact and photon-stimulated desorption , 2010 .

[19]  N. Mouawad,et al.  Monte Carlo modeling of sodium in Mercury’s exosphere during the first two MESSENGER flybys , 2010 .

[20]  S. Berg,et al.  Modelling of low energy ion sputtering from oxide surfaces , 2010 .

[21]  D. Rickman,et al.  Some Expected Mechanical Characteristics of Lunar Dust: A Geological View , 2008 .

[22]  P. Bochsler Minor ions in the solar wind , 2007 .

[23]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Monte Carlo model of sputtering and other ejection processes within a regolith , 2005 .

[24]  Thomas A. Bida,et al.  Discovery of calcium in Mercury's atmosphere , 2000, Nature.

[25]  Y. Yamamura,et al.  ENERGY DEPENDENCE OF ION-INDUCED SPUTTERING YIELDS FROM MONATOMIC SOLIDS AT NORMAL INCIDENCE , 1996 .

[26]  D. Hall Energetic Charged-Particle Interactions with Atmospheres and Surfaces. Vol. 19—Physics and Chemistry in Space R. E. Johnson, eds L. J. Lanzerotti and D. Stöffler, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1990, 230 pp, hard cover ISBN 3 540 51908 4, DM 178 , 1991 .

[27]  Robert E. Johnson Energetic Charged-Particle Interactions with Atmospheres and Surfaces , 1990 .

[28]  C. Hunt,et al.  Characterization of a high depth‐resolution tantalum pentoxide sputter profiling reference material , 1983 .

[29]  G. Wehner,et al.  MODIFICATION OF THE LUNAR SURFACE BY THE SOLAR-WIND BOMBARDMENT , 1963 .

[30]  S. Tsavachidis,et al.  Lags in Desorption of Lunar Volatiles , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[31]  M. W. Thompson II. The energy spectrum of ejected atoms during the high energy sputtering of gold , 1968 .