Psychophysical evidence for the number sense

It is now clear that most animals, including humans, possess an ability to rapidly estimate number. Some have questioned whether this ability arises from dedicated numerosity mechanisms, or is derived indirectly from judgements of density or other attributes. We describe a series of psychophysical experiments, largely using adaptation techniques, which demonstrate clearly the existence of a number sense in humans. The number sense is truly general, extending over space, time and sensory modality, and is closely linked with action. We further show that when multiple cues are present, numerosity emerges as the natural dimension for discrimination. However, when element density increases past a certain level, the elements become too crowded to parse, and the scene is perceived as a texture rather than array of elements. The two different regimes are psychophysically discriminable in that they follow distinct psychophysical laws, and show different dependencies on eccentricity, luminance levels and effects of perceptual grouping. The distinction is important, as the ability to discriminate numerosity, but not texture, correlates with formal maths skills. This article is part of the discussion meeting issue ‘The origins of numerical abilities’.

[1]  Eckart Zimmermann,et al.  Numerosity perception after size adaptation , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[2]  M. Landy,et al.  The effect of viewpoint on perceived visual roughness. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[3]  David C Burr,et al.  Visual sustained attention and numerosity sensitivity correlate with math achievement in children. , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  James T Todd,et al.  Are discrimination thresholds a valid measure of variance for judgments of slant from texture? , 2010, Journal of vision.

[6]  S. Dumoulin,et al.  Topographic representations of object size and relationships with numerosity reveal generalized quantity processing in human parietal cortex , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  D. Burr,et al.  A Visual Sense of Number , 2007, Current Biology.

[8]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Connectedness affects dot numerosity judgment: Implications for configural processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  J. Tanji,et al.  Numerical representation for action in the parietal cortex of the monkey , 2002, Nature.

[10]  Scott W. Brown Time, change, and motion: The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  D. C. Burr,et al.  Adaptation to number operates on perceived rather than physical numerosity , 2016, Cognition.

[12]  Guido Marco Cicchini,et al.  Spontaneous perception of numerosity in humans , 2016, Nature Communications.

[13]  David C. Burr,et al.  Connecting Visual Objects Reduces Perceived Numerosity and Density for Sparse but not Dense Patterns , 2017, J. Numer. Cogn..

[14]  A. Nieder The neuronal code for number , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[16]  David C. Burr,et al.  Separate Mechanisms for Perception of Numerosity and Density , 2014, Psychological science.

[17]  J. Ross Visual Discrimination of Number without Counting , 2003, Perception.

[18]  Frank Bremmer,et al.  Saccadic Compression of Symbolic Numerical Magnitude , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[20]  David Burr,et al.  Spatiotopic perceptual maps in humans: evidence from motion adaptation , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Albert Yonas,et al.  Infants and adults use line junction information to perceive 3D shape. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[22]  M. Morgan A bias-free measure of retinotopic tilt adaptation. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[23]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[24]  David C. Burr,et al.  The effects of cross-sensory attentional demand on subitizing and on mapping number onto space , 2012, Vision Research.

[25]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Education Enhances the Acuity of the Nonverbal Approximate Number System , 2013, Psychological science.

[26]  M. Hawken,et al.  Perceived velocity of luminance, chromatic and non-fourier stimuli: Influence of contrast and temporal frequency , 1996, Vision Research.

[27]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Time dilation in dynamic visual display. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[28]  John Ross,et al.  Visual processing of motion , 1986, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  David C Burr,et al.  Adaptation affects both high and low (subitized) numbers under conditions of high attentional load. , 2011, Seeing and perceiving.

[30]  Peter Földiák,et al.  Adaptation and decorrelation in the cortex , 1989 .

[31]  Tiangang Zhou,et al.  Topology-defined units in numerosity perception , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Manuela Piazza,et al.  Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and after-effects in high-level vision , 2005 .

[34]  David C Burr,et al.  Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[35]  Steven C Dakin,et al.  Number and density discrimination rely on a common metric: Similar psychophysical effects of size, contrast, and divided attention. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[36]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  From magnitude to natural numbers: A developmental neurocognitive perspective , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  Guido Marco Cicchini,et al.  Mechanisms for perception of numerosity or texture-density are governed by crowding-like effects. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[38]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The Role of Visual Information in Numerosity Estimation , 2012, PloS one.

[39]  M Concetta Morrone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  P. Mamassian,et al.  Predictive Properties of Visual Adaptation , 2012, Current Biology.

[41]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  G. Alvarez,et al.  Number estimation relies on a set of segmented objects , 2009, Cognition.

[43]  D. Burr,et al.  Motion psychophysics: 1985–2010 , 2011, Vision Research.

[44]  Anna C Nobre,et al.  Tracking the changing feature of a moving object. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[45]  F. Kingdom,et al.  A common visual metric for approximate number and density , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Are Subitizing and Counting Implemented as Separate or Functionally Overlapping Processes? , 2002, NeuroImage.

[47]  D. Burr,et al.  A shared numerical representation for action and perception , 2016, eLife.

[48]  G. Mandler,et al.  Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Sensitivity to numerosity is not a unique visuospatial psychophysical predictor of mathematical ability , 2013, Vision Research.

[50]  Serge O. Dumoulin,et al.  Can responses to basic non-numerical visual features explain neural numerosity responses? , 2017, NeuroImage.

[51]  S. Solomon,et al.  Moving Sensory Adaptation beyond Suppressive Effects in Single Neurons , 2014, Current Biology.

[52]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  A texture-processing model of the ‘visual sense of number’ , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  Guido Marco Cicchini,et al.  Number As a Primary Perceptual Attribute: A Review , 2016, Perception.

[54]  Helen M. Ditz,et al.  Neurons selective to the number of visual items in the corvid songbird endbrain , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line , 2015, Science.

[56]  F. Durgin Texture density adaptation and visual number revisited , 2008, Current Biology.

[57]  Sophie M. Wuerger,et al.  Input of long- and middle-wavelength-sensitive cones to orientation discrimination , 1999 .

[58]  H. Barlow,et al.  Evidence for a Physiological Explanation of the Waterfall Phenomenon and Figural After-effects , 1963, Nature.

[59]  A. Kohn Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[60]  Stephen F. Goodwin,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism: Can You Smell the Difference? , 2008, Current Biology.

[61]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[62]  D. Burr,et al.  Vision senses number directly. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[63]  Qixuan Chen,et al.  Association between individual differences in non-symbolic number acuity and math performance: a meta-analysis. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[64]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps , 2007, Neuron.

[65]  Pooja Viswanathan,et al.  Neuronal correlates of a visual “sense of number” in primate parietal and prefrontal cortices , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  G. Boynton Adaptation and attentional selection , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[67]  P. Thompson Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast , 1982, Vision Research.

[68]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. , 1995 .

[69]  Ikuya Murakami,et al.  Perceived duration of visual motion increases with speed. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[70]  A. Henik,et al.  The contribution of fish studies to the “number sense” debate , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[71]  M. Morrone,et al.  Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Activation of the Primary Visual Cortex Predicts Size Adaptation Illusion , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[72]  D. Burr,et al.  Saccades compress space, time and number , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[73]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation , 1999 .

[74]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[75]  D. Burr,et al.  Spatiotopic coding during dynamic head tilt. , 2017, Journal of neurophysiology.

[76]  M. Carandini,et al.  Adaptation maintains population homeostasis in primary visual cortex , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[77]  Elisa Castaldi,et al.  Numerosity but not texture-density discrimination correlates with math ability in children. , 2016, Developmental psychology.

[78]  B. P. Klein,et al.  Topographic Representation of Numerosity in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2013, Science.

[79]  Roberto Arrighi,et al.  Spatial but Not Temporal Numerosity Thresholds Correlate With Formal Math Skills in Children , 2017, Developmental psychology.

[80]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[81]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Does Subitizing Reflect Numerical Estimation? , 2022 .

[82]  David C. Burr,et al.  Effects of adaptation on numerosity decoding in the human brain , 2016, NeuroImage.

[83]  E. Spelke,et al.  Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. , 1999, Science.

[84]  Sheng He,et al.  Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[85]  J. Tanji,et al.  Deficits in action selection based on numerical information after inactivation of the posterior parietal cortex in monkeys. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[86]  Michael J. Morgan A bias-free measure of retinotopic tilt adaptation , 2014 .

[87]  D. L. Macadam Visual Sensitivities to Color Differences in Daylight , 1942 .

[88]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Evidence for counting in insects , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[89]  D. Burr,et al.  Visual aftereffects , 2009, Current Biology.

[90]  David C. Burr,et al.  A generalized sense of number , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[91]  Christian Agrillo,et al.  Individual differences in non-symbolic numerical abilities predict mathematical achievements but contradict ATOM , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[92]  M. Morgan,et al.  The computation of relative numerosity, size and density , 2016, Vision Research.

[93]  Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini,et al.  Numerical abilities in fish: A methodological review , 2017, Behavioural Processes.

[94]  D. Melcher,et al.  Subitizing reflects visuo-spatial object individuation capacity , 2011, Cognition.

[95]  David Aagten-Murphy,et al.  Adaptation to numerosity requires only brief exposures, and is determined by number of events, not exposure duration , 2016, Journal of vision.

[96]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Enumeration Processes in the Primate Parietal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[97]  J. Ross,et al.  Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[98]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[99]  E. Spelke,et al.  Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.