A Practical Guide for the Formulation of Propositions in the Bayesian Approach to DNA Evidence Interpretation in an Adversarial Environment
暂无分享,去创建一个
Simone Gittelson | Ian W. Evett | Duncan Taylor | John Buckleton | Franco Taroni | Tim Kalafut | Steven Myers | Tacha Hicks | Jo-Anne Bright | Duncan A. Taylor | I. Evett | F. Taroni | J. Buckleton | T. Hicks | S. Gittelson | J. Bright | Tim Kalafut | Steven Myers
[1] Swgdam Approved,et al. SWGDAM Interpretation Guidelines for Autosomal STR Typing by Forensic DNA Testing Laboratories , 2010 .
[2] I. Evett,et al. More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions. , 2000, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[3] Julia Mortera,et al. Analysis of DNA mixtures using Bayesian networks , 2003 .
[4] W R Mayr,et al. DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures. , 2006, Forensic science international.
[5] Jonathan Whitaker,et al. Interpreting small quantities of DNA: the hierarchy of propositions and the use of Bayesian networks. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.
[6] C Champod,et al. E-learning initiatives in forensic interpretation: report on experiences from current projects and outlook. , 2013, Forensic Science International.
[7] Paolo Garbolino,et al. Evaluation of scientific evidence using Bayesian networks. , 2002, Forensic science international.
[8] Mariya Goray,et al. DNA transfer during social interactions , 2013 .
[9] Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion. , 2009, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[10] Alex Biedermann,et al. Modeling the forensic two-trace problem with Bayesian networks , 2012, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[11] C M Triggs,et al. An extended likelihood ratio framework for interpreting evidence. , 2006, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[12] P Gill,et al. DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[13] F Taroni,et al. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[14] D J Balding,et al. DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. , 1994, Forensic science international.
[15] R. Nichols,et al. Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists , 1999, Heredity.
[16] Simone Gittelson,et al. Bayesian Networks and the Value of the Evidence for the Forensic Two‐Trace Transfer Problem * , 2012, Journal of forensic sciences.
[17] J. Buckleton,et al. Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation , 2004 .
[18] I. Evett,et al. A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework , 1998 .
[19] John Buckleton,et al. Application of Random Match Probability Calculations to Mixed STR Profiles , 2013, Journal of forensic sciences.
[20] I W Evett,et al. Evaluating DNA profiles in a case where the defence is "it was my brother". , 1992, Journal - Forensic Science Society.
[21] Colin Aitken,et al. Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science , 2006 .
[22] Duncan Taylor,et al. Helping formulate propositions in forensic DNA analysis. , 2014, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[23] W. Thompson,et al. Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials , 1987 .