Predicting Post-Discharge Community Violence in England and Wales Using the HCR-20V3

Structured guidelines are fundamental for risk assessment, formulation and decision-making in medium secure forensic psychiatric services in the UK. The most commonly used guideline for violence risk assessment in the UK is the HCR-20, so it is important that the new version of the HCR-20 (HCR-20V3) is validated in UK samples. The aims of this study were to investigate if the HCR-20V3 has satisfactory interrater reliability and predictive validity for community violence. A prospective confidential inquiry design was used. The HCR-20V3 demonstrated very good inter-rater reliability and significantly predicted community violence at six and twelve months post-discharge, with ROC AUCs of .73 and .70 respectively. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

[1]  JANINE PERRE.  Risk research , 1988, Nature.

[2]  M. Upton,et al.  Understanding and managing risk , 2013 .

[3]  D. Cooke,et al.  Limitations of Diagnostic Precision and Predictive Utility in the Individual Case: A Challenge for Forensic Practice , 2009, Law and human behavior.

[4]  Jeremy W Coid,et al.  Predicting future violence among individuals with psychopathy , 2013, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[5]  M. Dolan,et al.  The HCR-20 and post-discharge outcome in male patients discharged from medium security in the UK , 2004 .

[6]  S. Hart,et al.  Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: evaluating the 'margins of error' of group v. individual predictions of violence. , 2007, The British journal of psychiatry. Supplement.

[7]  Min Yang,et al.  The development of the Medium Security Recidivism Assessment Guide (MSRAG): an actuarial risk prediction instrument , 2009 .

[8]  J. Monahan,et al.  Rethinking Risk Assessment: The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence , 2001 .

[9]  M. Dolan,et al.  Predicting community violence from patients discharged from acute mental health units in England , 2012, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[10]  J. Monahan.  Risk assessment of violence among the mentally disordered: generating useful knowledge. , 1988, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[11]  Min Yang,et al.  Patients discharged from medium secure forensic psychiatry services: reconvictions and risk factors , 2007, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[12]  J. Gunn,et al.  Outcome of admission to a medium secure psychiatric unit , 1999, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[13]  S. Duggan,et al.  Forensic mental health services: facts and figures on current provision , 2008 .

[14]  Geraint Lewis,et al.  Risk Formulation: What are We Doing and Why? , 2009 .

[15]  M. Dolan,et al.  The validity of North American risk assessment tools in predicting in-patient violent behaviour in England , 2002 .

[16]  Christopher D. Webster,et al.  Violence risk assessment: Science and practice , 1999 .

[17]  M. Dolan,et al.  Predicting community violence from patients discharged from mental health services , 2006, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[18]  M. Dolan,et al.  Handbook of forensic mental health , 2008 .

[19]  Jennifer L. Skeem,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological Current Directions in Violence Risk Assessment on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[20]  M FISHBEIN,et al.  Health and social security. , 1948, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[21]  E. Mulvey,et al.  Why use multiple sources in research on patient violence in the community , 1994 .

[22]  Laura S. Guy,et al.  Empirical Support for the HCR‐20: A Critical Analysis of the Violence Literature , 2007 .

[23]  R. Snowden,et al.  Predicting violent reconvictions using the HCR-20 , 2008, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[24]  John Weir,et al.  HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme: Overview and Annotated Bibliography , 2005 .