Cardiovascular MR imaging at 3 T: opportunities, challenges, and solutions.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Thoralf Niendorf,et al. Myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 3 T: reference values, influencing factors and implications , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[2] M. Freeman,et al. Current state of the art , 2012 .
[3] S. Plein,et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial , 2012, The Lancet.
[4] Thoralf Niendorf,et al. Toward cardiovascular MRI at 7 T: clinical needs, technical solutions and research promises , 2010, European Radiology.
[5] Sukru Mehmet Erturk,et al. Use of 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluation of the abdomen. , 2009, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[6] M. Jerosch-Herold,et al. Accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance of absolute myocardial blood flow with a high-field system: comparison with conventional field strength. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[7] Kevin C. Chan,et al. Myocardial T2 quantitation in patients with iron overload at 3 Tesla , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[8] R. Pettigrew,et al. Profile order and time‐dependent artifacts in contrast‐enhanced coronary MR angiography at 3T: Origin and prevention , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[9] A. Quyyumi,et al. Variability of carotid artery measurements on 3-Tesla MRI and its impact on sample size calculation for clinical research , 2009, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[10] A. Khera,et al. Assessment and Reproducibility of Aortic Atherosclerosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Impact of 3-Tesla Field Strength and Parallel Imaging , 2008, Investigative radiology.
[11] G. Ligabue,et al. 3-Tesla MRI for the evaluation of myocardial viability: a comparative study with 1.5-Tesla MRI , 2008, La radiologia medica.
[12] Krishna S Nayak,et al. Measurement and characterization of RF nonuniformity over the heart at 3T using body coil transmission , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[13] C. Kuhl,et al. Whole-body high-field-strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice. Part I. Technical considerations and clinical applications. , 2008, Radiology.
[14] M. Reiser,et al. Inversion Recovery Single-Shot TurboFLASH for Assessment of Myocardial Infarction at 3 Tesla , 2007, Investigative radiology.
[15] Matthias Stuber,et al. Assessment of the carotid artery by MRI at 3T: A study on reproducibility , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[16] Carissa G. Fonseca,et al. Pulmonary MR perfusion at 3.0 Tesla using a blood pool contrast agent: Initial results in a swine model , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[17] C. Claussen,et al. Assessment of Myocardial Viability Using Delayed Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.
[18] Brian M Dale,et al. Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[19] M. McConnell,et al. Multicontrast black‐blood MRI of carotid arteries: Comparison between 1.5 and 3 tesla magnetic field strengths , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[20] O. Simonetti,et al. Multislice dark‐blood carotid artery wall imaging: A 1.5 T and 3.0 T comparison , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[21] Roderic I Pettigrew,et al. Effect of Gd‐DTPA‐BMA on blood and myocardial T1 at 1.5T and 3T in humans , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[22] Thoralf Niendorf,et al. Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Feasibility and Implications for Clinical Applications , 2006, Investigative radiology.
[23] S. Schoenberg,et al. Phase-Sensitive Inversion Recovery (PSIR) Single-Shot TrueFISP for Assessment of Myocardial Infarction at 3 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.
[24] Leon Axel,et al. B0 and B1‐insensitive uniform T1‐weighting for quantitative, first‐pass myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging , 2005 .
[25] D. Parker,et al. On the dark rim artifact in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[26] M. Bronskill,et al. T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[27] O. Simonetti,et al. Three‐dimensional breathhold SSFP coronary MRA: A comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[28] M. Gutberlet,et al. Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T , 2005, European Radiology.
[29] Matthias Gutberlet,et al. In vitro validation of phase‐contrast flow measurements at 3 T in comparison to 1.5 T: Precision, accuracy, and signal‐to‐noise ratios , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[30] Debiao Li,et al. Coronary arteries at 3.0 T: Contrast‐enhanced magnetization‐prepared three‐dimensional breathhold MR angiography , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[31] M. L. Lauzon,et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Challenges and Advantages in Clinical Neurological Imaging , 2003, Investigative radiology.
[32] Robert V Mulkern,et al. Double inversion black‐blood fast spin‐echo imaging of the human heart: A comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[33] Debiao Li,et al. Artifact reduction in true‐FISP imaging of the coronary arteries by adjusting imaging frequency , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[34] René M. Botnar,et al. Preliminary report on in vivo coronary MRA at 3 Tesla in humans , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[35] J. Schenck. Safety of Strong, Static Magnetic Fields , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[36] P. Kellman,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[37] K. Nayak,et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Open Access Three Dimensional First-pass Myocardial Perfusion Imaging at 3t: Feasibility Study , 2008 .
[38] M. Robson,et al. Assessment of left atrial volumes at 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla using FLASH and SSFP cine imaging. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[39] E. Fleck,et al. Improved quantitative assessment of left ventricular volumes using TGrE approach after application of extracellular contrast agent at 3 Tesla. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[40] P. Kellman,et al. Imaging sequences for first pass perfusion --a review. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[41] J. Glockner,et al. 3 Tesla MR imaging provides improved contrast in first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging over a range of gadolinium doses. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[42] René M. Botnar,et al. Initial experiences with in vivo right coronary artery human MR vessel wall imaging at 3 tesla. , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.