Academic Search in Response to Major Scientific Events

In this paper, we look at the search behavior of users of an academic search engine and in particular, their query patterns following the occurrence of major scientific events. We select Nobel Prize announcements as major scientific events and observe how academic searchers behave in response to their occurrences. We have found unique trends for the academic searchers, which are different from users of a web search engine. Moreover, academic searchers have similar query trends even for different topics, showing a commonality in their query behavior. The insights gained in this paper highlight the unique behavior of academic searchers and the differences from users of general web search engines. The findings may have implications for our understanding of the search behavior of academic searchers as well as for search engine design, for instance, concerning approaches to address information needs around major scientific events.

[1]  Vagelis Hristidis,et al.  How fresh do you want your search results? , 2013, CIKM.

[2]  Dietmar Wolfram,et al.  Log Analysis of Academic Digital Library: User Query Patterns , 2014 .

[3]  P. Young,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Understanding “influence:” an exploratory study of academics' processes of knowledge construction through iterative and interactive information seeking , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Keeping up to date: An academic researcher's information journey , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Online Exploration for Detecting Shifts in Fresh Intent , 2014, CIKM.

[7]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Information Processing and Management Investigating Queries and Search Failures in Academic Search , 2022 .

[8]  Hao-Ren Ke,et al.  Exploring behavior of E-journal users in science and technology: Transaction log analysis of Elsevier's ScienceDirect OnSite in Taiwan , 2002 .

[9]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  Information seeking behavior of academic scientists , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  D A Lindberg,et al.  Internet access to the National Library of Medicine. , 2000, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[11]  Sally Jo Cunningham,et al.  A transaction log analysis of a digital library , 2000, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[12]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Do Topic Shift and Query Reformulation Patterns Correlate in Academic Search? , 2017, ECIR.

[14]  Brian D. Davison,et al.  Learning to rank for freshness and relevance , 2011, SIGIR.

[15]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1971 .

[16]  M. F.,et al.  Bibliography , 1985, Experimental Gerontology.