New directions in equity research.

This article consists of four sections: The first section elucidates a general theory of social behavior—equity theory. Equity theory consists of four propositions designed to predict when individuals will perceive that they are justly treated and how they will react when they find themselves enmeshed in unjust relationships. The second section summarizes the extensive research that has been conducted to lest equity theory. The third section points out the ways in which equity theory interlocks with other major social psychological theories. The final section hints at some ways in which equity theory can be applied to understanding social problems. THE THEORETICAL FORMULATION The proposition that individuals seek for themselves maximum reward at minimum cost is hardly startling. Theories in a wide variety of disciplines rest on the assumption that "Man is selfish." Psychologists believe that behavior can be shaped by the careful application of reinforcement s. Economists assume that individuals will purchase desired products at the lowest available price. Moral philosophers conclude that the ideal society can only be one which insures the "greatest good for the greatest number." Politicians contend that "Every man has his price." Equity theory, too, rests on the assumption that man is selfish. Thus, our first proposition states: Proposition I: Individuals will try to maximize their outcomes (where outcomes equal rewards minus costs). If everyone were unrestrained in his attempts to get what he wanted, everyone would suffer. Every man would attempt to monopolize community resources; every man would be continually confronted by rivals bent on reclaiming these resources. Only by working out a compromise can the group avoid continual warfare and maximize collective reward. This fact is acknowledged in Proposition II A:

[1]  Essays: Moral, Political and Aesthetic , 1865 .

[2]  R. Merton Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[3]  E. Suchman,et al.  The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life. , 1949 .

[4]  John Thibaut,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Cohesiveness of Underprivileged Groups , 1950 .

[5]  E. Goffman On cooling the mark out; some aspects of adaptation to failure. , 1952, Psychiatry.

[6]  Lévi-Strauss's Theory on kinship and marriage , 1952 .

[7]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[8]  Henry W. Riecken,et al.  Some Determinants and Consequences of the Perception of Social Causality1 , 1955 .

[9]  Erich Fromm,et al.  The Art of Loving , 1956 .

[10]  J. Borus : The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in two Government Agencies , 1956 .

[11]  P. Blau,et al.  The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies. , 1956 .

[12]  F. Harary,et al.  STRUCTURAL BALANCE: A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER'S THEORY1 , 1977 .

[13]  P. Blau,et al.  The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies. , 1956 .

[14]  Gresham M. Sykes,et al.  Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. , 1957 .

[15]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[16]  J. Mills Changes in moral attitudes following temptation1 , 1958 .

[17]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[18]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Changes in interpersonal perception as a means of reducing cognitive dissonance. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[19]  Robert B. Zajonc,et al.  THE CONCEPTS OF BALANCE, CONGRUITY, AND DISSONANCE , 1960 .

[20]  Restitution to Victims of Crime , 1961 .

[21]  J. Aronfreed The nature, variety, and social patterning of moral responses to transgression. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[22]  G. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1961 .

[23]  Personality dynamics and development , 1963 .

[24]  A. Buss,et al.  Dissonance, aggression, and evaluation of pain. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[25]  J. S. Adams,et al.  The relationship of worker productivity to cognitive dissonance about wage inequities. , 1962 .

[26]  J. Baldwin The Fire Next Time , 1963 .

[27]  P. Young,et al.  Emotion and personality , 1963 .

[28]  J. S. Adams,et al.  TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF INEQUITY. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[29]  J. Brehm,et al.  Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance , 1962 .

[30]  Adams Js Towards an understanding of inequity , 1963 .

[31]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[32]  P. F. Secord,et al.  The Compromise Process and the Affect Structure of Groups , 1964 .

[33]  D. C. Glass CHANGES IN LIKING AS A MEANS OF REDUCING COGNITIVE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN SELF-ESTEEM AND AGGRESSION. , 1964, Journal of personality.

[34]  A. Buss,et al.  EFFECTS OF JUSTIFICATION FOR AGGRESSION AND COMMUNICATION WITH THE VICTIM ON POSTAGGRESSION DISSONANCE. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[35]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Aggression: A Social Psychological Analysis. , 1964 .

[36]  J. Aronfreed THE ORIGIN OF SELF-CRITICISM. , 1964, Psychological review.

[37]  A. Bandura Vicarious Processes: A Case of No-Trial Learning1 , 1965 .

[38]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[39]  E. Walster,et al.  Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  M. Lerner,et al.  Observer's reaction to the "innocent victim": compassion or rejection? , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  M. D. Dunnette,et al.  The role of financial compensation in industrial motivation. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  E. Walster,et al.  The effect on liking of underrating or overrating another , 1966 .

[43]  R. B. Darlington,et al.  Displacement of guilt-produced altruistic behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  B. Latané Studies in social comparison , 1966 .

[45]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Debriefing and susceptibility to subsequent experimental manipulations. , 1966 .

[46]  L. Wheeler,et al.  The contagion of aggression , 1966 .

[47]  B. Maher Principles of psychopathology : an experimental approach , 1966 .

[48]  E. Walster,et al.  The effect of misjudging another: Over-compensation or dissonance reduction? , 1966 .

[49]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Reciprocity and responsibility reactions to prior help. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  Cécile Alves,et al.  Tally's Corner , 1967 .

[51]  A. Ir Wage inequity and job performance: an experimental study. , 1967 .

[52]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  Some social class differences in helping behavior. , 1967 .

[53]  E. Berscheid,et al.  A determinant of preference among modes of dissonance reduction. , 1967 .

[54]  E. Berscheid,et al.  When does a harm-doer compensate a victim? , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  E. Lawler,et al.  Effects of inequity produced by underpayment on work output, work quality, and attitudes toward the work. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  J. Freedman,et al.  Compliance without pressure: The effect of guilt. , 1967 .

[57]  M. Lerner,et al.  Reactions to suffering of others under conditions of indirect responsibility. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  R. Brislin,et al.  Dating and Physical Attractiveness: Replication , 1968, Psychological reports.

[59]  K. Weick,et al.  Preferences among forms of equity , 1968 .

[60]  A. Inkeles,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. , 1968 .

[61]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Retaliation as a means of restoring equity. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[62]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  The handbook of social psychology, 2nd ed. , 1968 .

[63]  J. Darley,et al.  Effect of forced assocation upon voluntary choice to associate. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  D. Bramel,et al.  An observers' reaction to the suffereing of his enemy. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  WORDS, DEEDS, AND THE PERCEPTION OF CONSEQUENCES AND RESPONSIBILITY IN ACTION SITUATIONS ' , 1968 .

[66]  E. Lawler Equity theory as a predictor of productivity and work quality. , 1968 .

[67]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Effect of Time on Tendency to Compensate a Victim , 1969, Psychological reports.

[68]  David Landy,et al.  Liking a Person as a Function of Doing Him a Favour , 1969 .

[69]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  The Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis Revisited , 1969 .

[70]  G. Marwell,et al.  Minimizing Differences in a Maximizing Difference Game. , 1969 .

[71]  G. Leventhal,et al.  Self-Depriving Behavior as a Response to Unprofitable Inequity. , 1969 .

[72]  Eugene A. Weinstein,et al.  The Redress of Distributive Injustice , 1969, American Journal of Sociology.

[73]  E. Weinstein,et al.  Obligation and the Flow of Deference in Exchange , 1969 .

[74]  John S. Allen,et al.  Reducing inequity by reallocating rewards , 1969 .

[75]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Equity theory: A review and critique. , 1969 .

[76]  G. Leventhal Equity, Reciprocity, and Reallocating Rewards in the Dyad. , 1969 .

[77]  A. Gross,et al.  Some effects of guilt on compliance. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[78]  M. Mauss The gift : Forms and functions of exchange in Archaic Societies / Marcel Mauss , 2020 .

[79]  G. Leventhal,et al.  Self-interest and the maintenance of equity. , 1970 .

[80]  G. Leventhal,et al.  Sex, age, and equity behavior. , 1970 .

[81]  T. Gurr,et al.  Why Men Rebel. , 1970 .

[82]  E. Walster The Effect of Self-Esteem on Liking for Dates of Various Social Desirabilities. , 1970 .

[83]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Indebtedness: An adverse aspect of asking for and receiving help. , 1971 .

[84]  E. Walster,et al.  Legal Structures and Restoring Equity1 , 1971 .

[85]  J. Thibaut,et al.  Some determinants of the intensity of social protest , 1971 .

[86]  G. William Walster,et al.  Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis☆ , 1971 .

[87]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Effect of intentionality on willingness to reciprocate a favor , 1972 .

[88]  K. Baker Experimental analysis of third-party justice behavior. , 1974 .