Trained Artificial Neural Network for Glaucoma Diagnosis Using Visual Field Data: A Comparison With Conventional Algorithms
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] L Brigatti,et al. Neural networks to identify glaucoma with structural and functional measurements. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.
[2] A Heijl,et al. Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.
[3] G. Lindgren,et al. The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects. , 1989, Archives of ophthalmology.
[4] B. Bengtsson,et al. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.
[5] B. Bengtsson,et al. Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and the Humphrey Full Threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC. , 1999, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.
[6] D B Henson,et al. Visual field analysis using artificial neural networks , 1994, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.
[7] J. Hanley,et al. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.
[8] C. Bunce,et al. The ability of the GDx Nerve Fibre Analyser neural network to diagnose glaucoma , 2001, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
[9] Xiaohui Liu,et al. A spatio-temporal Bayesian network classifier for understanding visual field deterioration , 2005, Artif. Intell. Medicine.
[10] Anders Heijl,et al. Effects of input data on the performance of a neural network in distinguishing normal and glaucomatous visual fields. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[11] Georg Lindgren,et al. A package for the statistical analysis of visual fields , 1987 .
[12] Robert N Weinreb,et al. Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[13] David Keating,et al. Visual field interpretation with a personal computer based neural network , 1994, Eye.
[14] T. Sejnowski,et al. Unsupervised machine learning with independent component analysis to identify areas of progression in glaucomatous visual fields. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[15] A Heijl,et al. Arcuate cluster analysis in glaucoma perimetry. , 1993, Journal of glaucoma.
[16] T. Sejnowski,et al. Heidelberg retina tomograph measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[17] L N Johnson,et al. Visual field interpretation with empiric probability maps. , 1989, Archives of ophthalmology.
[18] Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al. Comparison of machine learning and traditional classifiers in glaucoma diagnosis , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[19] J. Wild,et al. The influence of the learning effect on automated perimetry in patients with suspected glaucoma , 1989, Acta ophthalmologica.
[20] A Heijl,et al. Spatial analyses of glaucomatous visual fields; a comparison with traditional visual field indices , 1992, Acta ophthalmologica.
[21] C. Glymour,et al. Optical coherence tomography machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection: a preliminary study. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[22] J Katz,et al. Neural networks for visual field analysis: how do they compare with other algorithms? , 1999, Journal of glaucoma.
[23] Mei-Ling Huang,et al. Development and comparison of automated classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Stratus optical coherence tomography. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[24] Balwantray C. Chauhan,et al. A cluster analysis for threshold perimetry , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
[25] Robert N Weinreb,et al. Comparing neural networks and linear discriminant functions for glaucoma detection using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[26] J Katz,et al. Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.
[27] B. Bengtsson,et al. Early Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma: A Study of Eyes Developing Field Loss , 1996 .
[28] T. Sejnowski,et al. Relevance vector machine and support vector machine classifier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[29] M. Zweig,et al. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.
[30] Robert N Weinreb,et al. Using unsupervised learning with variational bayesian mixture of factor analysis to identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[31] Robert N Weinreb,et al. Using unsupervised learning with independent component analysis to identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[32] Douglas R. Anderson. Automated Static Perimetry , 1992 .
[33] M H Goldbaum,et al. Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[34] Anders Heijl,et al. Essential perimetry: The field analyzer primer , 2002 .
[35] A. Heijl,et al. Evaluation of methods for automated Hemifield analysis in perimetry. , 1992, A M A Archives of Ophthalmology.