Evaluation of Bone Quality near Metallic Implants with and without Lotus-Type Pores for Optimal Biomaterial Design

The stress shielding effect often degrades the quality and quantity of bone near implants. Thus, the shape and structure of metallic biomaterials should be optimally designed. A dominant inorganic substance in bone is biological apatite (BAp) nanocrystal, which basically crystallizes in an anisotropic hexagonal lattice. The BAp c-axis is parallel to elongated collagen fibers. Because the BAp orientation of bone is a possible parameter of bone quality near implants, we used a microbeam X-ray diffractometer system with a beam spot, which had a diameter of 50 μmφ or 100 μmφ, to evaluate it. Two animal models were prepared: (1) a nail model (φ: 3.0 mm, SUS316L), which was used to understand the stress shielding effect in a rabbit tibial marrow cavity; and (2) a model of a lotus-type porous implant (φ: 3.4 mm, mean pore diameter: 170 μm, SUS304L), which was used to understand the effect of the unidirectional-elongated pore direction in anisotropic bone tissue of a beagle mandible. The porous implants were implanted so that the pore direction was parallel or perpendicular to the mesiodistal axis of the mandible. For the porous implant model, new bone formation strongly depended on the elongated pore direction and the time after implantation. For example, four weeks after implantation, new bone formed in pores of the implants, but the BAp orientation degree in the new bone was more similar to that in the original bone in the elongated pores parallel to the mesiodistal direction than that in the perpendicular pores. These differences in bone formation inside the parallel and perpendicular pores may be closely related to the anisotropy of original bone tissue such as the orientations of collagen fiber, BAp, and blood vessels. The orientation degree of the BAp also changed in the nail model. The stress shielding effect decreased the orientation degree of the BAp c-axis in the tibia along the longitudinal axis. Thus, the optimal design of metallic biomaterials, including such characteristics as implant shape, pore size, and elongated pore direction should be based on the anisotropy of the bone microstructure.

[1]  Y. Tabata,et al.  Crystallographic Approach to Regenerated and Pathological Hard Tissues , 2006 .

[2]  Y. Tabata,et al.  Role of Stress Distribution on Healing Process of Preferential Alignment of Biological Apatite in Long Bones , 2006 .

[3]  Y. Tabata,et al.  Role of Osteoclast in Preferential Alignment of Biological Apatite (BAp) in Long Bones , 2006 .

[4]  Kihei Kobayashi,et al.  Comparison of metal concentrations in rat tibia tissues with various metallic implants. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[5]  H. Nakajima,et al.  Fabrication of Lotus‐type Porous Metals and their Physical Properties , 2004 .

[6]  Mitsuo Niinomi,et al.  Fatigue performance and cyto-toxicity of low rigidity titanium alloy, Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[7]  Taiji Adachi,et al.  Effects of a Fixation Screw on Trabecular Structural Changes in a Vertebral Body Predicted by Remodeling Simulation , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Y. Tabata,et al.  Unique alignment and texture of biological apatite crystallites in typical calcified tissues analyzed by microbeam X-ray diffractometer system. , 2002, Bone.

[9]  E. Abel,et al.  A finite element analysis of hollow stemmed hip prostheses as a means of reducing stress shielding of the femur. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  D R Sumner,et al.  Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  D R Sumner,et al.  Functional adaptation and ingrowth of bone vary as a function of hip implant stiffness. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Finite element models in tissue mechanics and orthopaedic implant design. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  R E Guldberg,et al.  Trabecular bone adaptation to variations in porous-coated implant topology. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  W. Landis The strength of a calcified tissue depends in part on the molecular structure and organization of its constituent mineral crystals in their organic matrix. , 1995, Bone.

[15]  N. Gjerdet,et al.  Immediate strain shielding after femoral reaming and nailing. An in vivo study in rat femora. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[16]  N. Gjerdet,et al.  Strain shielding 12 weeks after femoral reaming and nailing in rats. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[17]  J L Lewis,et al.  The influence of prosthetic stem stiffness and of a calcar collar on stresses in the proximal end of the femur with a cemented femoral component. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  R M Pilliar,et al.  The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  W. Bonfield,et al.  Anisotropy of the Young's modulus of bone , 1977, Nature.

[20]  Y. Tabata,et al.  Texture and Bone Reinforcement , 2005 .

[21]  H. Nakajima,et al.  Fabrication of lotus-type porous stainless steel by continuous zone melting technique and mechanical property , 2005 .

[22]  Y. Tabata,et al.  EFFECTS OF APPLIED STRESS ON PREFERENTIAL ALIGNMENT OF BIOLOGICAL APATITE IN RABBIT FORELIMB BONES , 2004 .

[23]  R. Griffiths,et al.  Orientation of apatite crystals in relation to muscle attachment in the mandible. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.