A new approach for grouping learners in CSCL systems

Many researchers have shown the good effects of collaborative learning. This learning strategy aims at providing learners, who are grouped in small groups, with some tools for increasing their cognitive and behavioral profiles. In CSCL (Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning) environments, knowledge construction appears through the interaction among peers. In the literature, there are many works that focus on collaborative learning but most of them ignore the key question: what is the appropriate method to be used for forming groups? In fact, having appropriate groups allows to get good interactions among group members, which improves the results of collaborative learning. In most cases, the grouping of learners has no criterion or uses a random selection. In this paper, we propose a new method for the automatic grouping of learners based on two criteria: the complementary skills on concepts and the learning styles obtained according to the Felder-Silverman model. The goal of the proposed clustering method is to have heterogeneous groups where each group contains members who have most of the concepts (each concept held by a student), and at the same time have different learning styles. The proposed approach is used by a CSCL system called ComGroupe, which is tested at an Algerian University. The obtained results of its first use are very encouraging.

[1]  David Meyer,et al.  OptAssign - A web-based tool for assigning students to groups , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Kyparisia A. Papanikolaou,et al.  A Group Formation Tool in an E-Learning Context , 2007 .

[3]  Annemette Kjærgaard,et al.  Student team formation based on learning styles at university start: Does it make a difference to the students? , 2009 .

[4]  Andrea Solimeno,et al.  The influence of students and teachers characteristics on the efficacy of face-to-face and computer supported collaborative learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Lewis A. Bizo,et al.  Team-skills training enhances collaborative learning , 2006 .

[6]  N. Webb Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups , 1982 .

[7]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Students' experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Yen-Ting Lin,et al.  An automatic group composition system for composing collaborative learning groups using enhanced particle swarm optimization , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[9]  C. Howe,et al.  Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools , 2010 .

[10]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  DIANA: A computer-supported heterogeneous grouping system for teachers to conduct successful small learning groups , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Estefanía Martín,et al.  Using Learning Styles for Dynamic Group Formation in Adaptive Collaborative Hypermedia Systems , 2004, ICWE Workshops.

[12]  Kyparisia A. Papanikolaou,et al.  A Group Formation Tool in an E-Learning Context , 2007, 19th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence(ICTAI 2007).

[13]  Simon Hooper,et al.  Cooperative CBI: The Effects of Heterogeneous versus Homogeneous Grouping on the Learning of Progressively Complex Concepts , 1988 .

[14]  Donatella Cesareni,et al.  The nature of the discourse in web-based Collaborative Learning Environments: Case studies from four different countries , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[15]  David W. Dalton,et al.  Effects of individual and cooperative computer-assisted instruction on student performance and attitudes , 1989 .

[16]  Minou Ella Mebane,et al.  Developing professional skills and social capital through computer supported collaborative learning in university contexts , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  Demetrio Arturo Ovalle Carranza,et al.  A genetic algorithm approach for group formation in collaborative learning considering multiple student characteristics , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Using Collective Trust for Group Formation , 2012, CRIWG.

[19]  Dinesh P. Mehta,et al.  Forming project groups while learning about matching and network flows in algorithms , 2012, ITiCSE '12.

[20]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Small-Group Composition and Peer Effects. , 2002 .

[21]  E. Lemke,et al.  Group variables influencing the transfer of conceptual behavior. , 1971 .