The Role of Tactile Flow in Processing Dynamic Haptic Stimuli

Dynamic stimuli in visual and tactile sensory modalities share fundamental psychophysical features that can be explained by similar computational models. In vision, information about relative motion between objects and the observer are mainly processed by optic flow, which is a 2D field of velocities associated with variation of brightness patterns in the image plane. It provides important information about cues for region and boundary segmentation, shape recovery, and so on. For instance, radial patterns of optic flow are often used to estimate time before contact with an approaching object. We put forward the hypothesis that a similar behavior can be present in the tactile domain, in which an analogous paradigm to optic flow might exist. Moreover, as optic flow is also invoked to explain several visual illusions, including the well-known ”barber-pole” effect and Ouchi’s illusion, we investigate whether similar misperceptions can be observed in the tactile domain as well. After introducing a computational model of tactile flow, which is intimately related to existing models for the visual counterpart a set of experiments aiming at reproducing the corresponding visual illusion in the tactile domain was arranged and performed. Findings of the experiments here reported indicate that visual and tactile flow share similarities at the psychophysical and computational level and may be intended for similar perceptive goals. Results of this analysis can have great impact on engineering side to implement better haptic and multimodal interfaces for human-computer interaction.

[1]  J. Gibson The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[2]  J. Moran,et al.  Sensation and perception , 1980 .

[3]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Determining Optical Flow , 1981, Other Conferences.

[4]  L. Pubols,et al.  Magnitude scaling of displacement and velocity of tactile stimuli applied to the human hand , 1982, Brain Research.

[5]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  S. Lederman,et al.  The physiology and psychophysics of touch , 1988 .

[7]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Perceived speed and direction of complex gratings and plaids. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. II. Mechanisms of response selectivity revealed by small-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  A. Verri,et al.  First-order analysis of optical flow in monkey brain. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Graziano,et al.  Tuning of MST neurons to spiral motions , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactual discrimination of softness. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Image Divergence and Deformation from Closed Curves , 1997, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[15]  B. Khang,et al.  A Motion Illusion from Two-Dimensional Periodic Patterns , 1997, Perception.

[16]  J. Duysens,et al.  Responses in ventral intraparietal area of awake macaque monkey to optic flow patterns corresponding to rotation of planes in depth can be explained by translation and expansion effects , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[17]  L. Vaina Complex motion perception and its deficits , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  SA1 and RA receptive fields, response variability, and population responses mapped with a probe array. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  D. Burr,et al.  A cortical area that responds specifically to optic flow, revealed by fMRI , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Tactile Functions of Mechanoreceptive Afferents Innervating the Hand , 2000, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[21]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Haptic discrimination of softness in teleoperation: the role of the contact area spread rate , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[22]  J. Zanker,et al.  The Directional Tuning of the Barber-Pole Illusion , 2001, Perception.

[23]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Performance of optical flow techniques , 1994, International Journal of Computer Vision.