Toward improved streamflow forecasts: value of semidistributed modeling

The focus of this study is to assess the performance improvements of semidistributed applications of the U.S. National Weather Service Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting model on a watershed using radar‐based remotely sensed precipitation data. Specifically, performance comparisons are made within an automated multicriteria calibration framework to evaluate the benefit of “spatial distribution” of the model input (precipitation), structural components (soil moisture and streamflow routing computations), and surface characteristics (parameters). A comparison of these results is made with those obtained through manual calibration. Results indicate that for the study watershed, there are performance improvements associated with semidistributed model applications when the watershed is partitioned into three subwatersheds; however, no additional benefit is gained from increasing the number of subwatersheds from three to eight. Improvements in model performance are demonstrably related to the spatial distribution of the model input and streamflow routing. Surprisingly, there is no improvement associated with the distribution of the surface characteristics (model parameters).

[1]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods , 2000 .

[2]  Victor Koren,et al.  Use of Soil Property Data in the Derivation of Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Model Parameters , 2000 .

[3]  V. Koren,et al.  Lumped and Semi-distributed Modeling using NEXRAD Stage-III Data: Results from Continuous Multi-year Simulations , 1999 .

[4]  Victor Koren,et al.  Distributed modeling phase 1 results , 1999 .

[5]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  On the simulation of infiltration‐ and saturation‐excess runoff using radar‐based rainfall estimates: Effects of algorithm uncertainty and pixel aggregation , 1998 .

[6]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information , 1998 .

[7]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models , 1998 .

[8]  Patrice Ogou Yapo A multiobjective global optimization algorithm with application to calibration of hydrologic models , 1996 .

[9]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  The NWS River Forecast System - catchment modeling. , 1995 .

[10]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Effect of rainfall‐sampling errors on simulations of desert flash floods , 1994 .

[11]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  Runoff model sensitivity to radar rainfall resolution , 1994 .

[12]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  Runoff sensitivity to temporal and spatial rainfall variability at runoff plane and small basin scales , 1993 .

[13]  A. Jakeman,et al.  How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall‐runoff model? , 1993 .

[14]  David A. Imy,et al.  A Description of the Initial Set of Analysis Products Available from the NEXRAD WSR-88D System , 1993 .

[15]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  A Monte Carlo Study of rainfall sampling effect on a distributed catchment model , 1991 .

[16]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[17]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: The question of parameter observability and uniqueness , 1983 .

[18]  E. L. Peck,et al.  Catchment modeling and initial parameter estimation for the National Weather Service River Forecast System , 1976 .