Evaluation of Web Accessibility: A Combined Method

The Web is present in all fields of our life, from information and service Web pages to electronic public administration (e-government). Users of the Web are a heterogeneous and multicultural public, with different abilities and disabilities (visual, hearing, cognitive, and motor impairments). Web accessibility is about making websites accessible to all Internet users (both disabled and non-disabled). To assure and certify the fulfillment of Web accessibility guidelines, various accessibility evaluation methods have been proposed, and are classified in two types: qualitative methods (analytical and empirical) and quantitative methods (metric-based methods). As no method by itself is enough to guarantee full accessibility, many studies combine these qualitative and quantitative methods in order to guarantee better results. Some recent studies have presented combined evaluation methods between qualitative methods only, thus leaving behind the great power of metrics that guarantee objective results. In this chapter, a combined accessibility evaluation method based both on qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods is proposed. This proposal presents an evaluation method combining essential analytical evaluation methods and empirical test methods.

[1]  Giorgio Brajnik,et al.  SAMBA: a semi-automatic method for measuring barriers of accessibility , 2007, Assets '07.

[2]  Markel Vigo,et al.  Quantitative metrics for measuring web accessibility , 2007, W4A '07.

[3]  Helen Petrie,et al.  The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites , 2007, CHI.

[4]  Michael Daskalantonakis,et al.  A Practical View of Software Measurement and Implementation Experiences Within Motorola , 1992, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[5]  Markel Vigo,et al.  Automatic web accessibility metrics: Where we are and where we can go , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[6]  Bambang Parmanto,et al.  Metric for Web accessibility evaluation , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Giorgio Brajnik,et al.  Measuring Web Accessibility by Estimating Severity of Barriers , 2008, WISE Workshops.

[8]  Elizabeth Burd,et al.  Tree-map visualisation for Web accessibility , 2005, 29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'05).

[9]  Dag Svanæs,et al.  Evaluating web site accessibility: validating the WAI guidelines through usability testing with disabled users , 2008, NordiCHI.

[10]  Cynthia D. Waddell,et al.  Web Accessibility: Web Standards and Regulatory Compliance , 2006 .

[11]  K. Welch,et al.  Affect-Sensitive Computing and Autism , 2014 .

[12]  Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes,et al.  An evaluation of web accessibility metrics based on their attributes , 2008, SIGDOC '08.

[13]  Sergio Luján Mora Accesibilidad de la página web del Senado de España (2/2) (presentación) , 2011 .

[14]  Jan Richards,et al.  Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines , 1999 .

[15]  Jennifer Mankoff,et al.  Is your web page accessible?: a comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind , 2005, CHI.

[16]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0 , 2001, INTR.

[17]  Boaventura DaCosta,et al.  Social Skills Development for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders through the Use of Interactive Storytelling Games , 2014 .

[18]  Nils Ulltveit-Moe,et al.  Interpreting Results from Large Scale Automatic Evaluation of Web Accessibility , 2006, ICCHP.

[19]  Wendy Chisholm Checklist of Checkpoints for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 , 1999 .

[20]  Atiwong Suchato,et al.  Quantitative evaluation for web accessibility with respect to disabled groups , 2009, W4A.

[21]  Giorgio Brajnik,et al.  Beyond Conformance: The Role of Accessibility Evaluation Methods , 2008, WISE Workshops.