Trade‐off between light interception efficiency and light use efficiency: implications for species coexistence in one‐sided light competition

Summary 1. Taller plant species can pre-empt solar energy and suppress growth of subordinate species in vegetation stands, which is described through one-sided competition. Yet, in much of the world’s vegetation species of different statures coexist. This study aims to clarify the mechanisms underlying this apparent paradox. 2. We quantified how co-occurring species and individuals intercepted and used light for growth in a mature, warm-temperate evergreen forest. This was performed by determining the 3D distribution of foliage and light with a ground-based lidar system in combination with nondestructive measurements of plant growth. 3. Taller trees intercepted light more efficiently per unit of above-ground biomass than shorter trees did (=higher light interception efficiency, LIE). However, taller trees tended to have lower biomass production per unit light interception (=lower light use efficiency, LUE). Reduced LUE in taller trees was associated with their higher biomass allocation to nonphotosynthetic organs and probably with over-saturated light intensity for photosynthesis at high canopy positions. Due to the increased LIE and decreased LUE with tree heights, a trade-off between LIE and LUE was found, and this trade-off resulted in trees of different statures having similar relative growth rates. 4. Synthesis. Light competition drives trees to grow taller, and the light interception efficiency is higher in taller trees; however, this benefit comes at a cost of decreased efficiency of light use for growth. This trade-off allows trees of different statures to grow at proportionally comparable rates and may promote coexistence of tree species in one-sided light competition.

[1]  K. Hikosaka,et al.  Light acquisition and use by individuals competing in a dense stand of an annual herb, Xanthium canadense , 1999, Oecologia.

[2]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Global patterns of leaf mechanical properties. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[3]  Robin L. Chazdon,et al.  PHOTOSYNTHETIC LIGHT ENVIRONMENTS IN A LOWLAND TROPICAL RAIN FOREST IN COSTA RICA , 1984 .

[4]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  On the Adaptive Significance of Leaf Height in Forest Herbs , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[5]  M. Werger,et al.  Biomass allocation and leaf life span in relation to light interception by tropical forest plants during the first years of secondary succession , 2008 .

[6]  T. Kohyama,et al.  One‐sided competition for light promotes coexistence of forest trees that share the same adult height , 2012 .

[7]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Hydraulic Limits to Tree Height and Tree Growth , 1997 .

[8]  John D. Aber,et al.  FOLIAGE-HEIGHT PROFILES AND SUCCESSION IN NORTHERN HARDWOOD FORESTS' , 1979 .

[9]  M. Westoby,et al.  Bivariate line‐fitting methods for allometry , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[10]  J. Amthor.  From sunlight to phytomass: on the potential efficiency of converting solar radiation to phyto-energy. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[11]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Foliage Profile by Vertical Measurements , 1969 .

[12]  L. Poorter,et al.  Tree architecture and life‐history strategies across 200 co‐occurring tropical tree species , 2011 .

[13]  Kaoru Kitajima,et al.  Tissue-level leaf toughness, but not lamina thickness, predicts sapling leaf lifespan and shade tolerance of tropical tree species. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[14]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  SUNFLECKS AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN PLANT CANOPIES , 1990 .

[15]  S. Schwinning.  Decomposition Analysis of Competitive Symmetry and Size Structure Dynamics , 1996 .

[16]  M. Westoby,et al.  Plant height and evolutionary games , 2003 .

[17]  R. Ryel,et al.  Effects of photoinhibition on whole‐plant carbon gain assessed with a photosynthesis model , 2001 .

[18]  Evan H. DeLucia,et al.  Forest carbon use efficiency: is respiration a constant fraction of gross primary production? , 2007 .

[19]  K. Mccree.  Test of current definitions of photosynthetically active radiation against leaf photosynthesis data , 1972 .

[20]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants , 1998, Oecologia.

[21]  Leaves of pioneer and later-successional trees have similar lifetime carbon gain in tropical secondary forest. , 2010, Ecology.

[22]  T. Kohyama,et al.  The stratification theory for plant coexistence promoted by one‐sided competition , 2009 .

[23]  J. Weiner,et al.  Asymmetric competition in plant populations. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  T. Kohyama,et al.  Tree species stratification in relation to allometry and demography in a warm-temperate rain forest , 1996 .

[25]  T. Hiura,et al.  Accuracy of the MacArthur-Horn method for estimating a foliage profile , 1998 .

[26]  Da‐Yong Zhang,et al.  Donald's ideotype and growth redundancy: a game theoretical analysis , 1999 .

[27]  日本学術会議国際生物学事業計画特別委員会,et al.  Primary productivity of Japanese forests : productivity of terrestrial communities , 1977 .

[28]  M. Werger,et al.  The limited importance of size-asymmetric light competition and growth of pioneer species in early secondary forest succession in Vietnam , 2008, Oecologia.

[29]  Jonathan Silvertown,et al.  Plant coexistence and the niche , 2004 .

[30]  M. Werger,et al.  Light partitioning among species and species replacement in early successional grasslands , 2002 .

[31]  K. Akutsu,et al.  Assessment of higher insect taxa as bioindicators for different logging-disturbance regimes in lowland tropical rain forest in Sabah, Malaysia , 2007, Ecological Research.

[32]  K. Hikosaka,et al.  Leaf nitrogen distribution in relation to leaf age and photon flux density in dominant and subordinate plants in dense stands of a dicotyledonous herb , 1998, Oecologia.

[33]  G. Berntson,et al.  CHARACTERIZING THE SIZE DEPENDENCE OF RESOURCE ACQUISITION WITHIN CROWDED PLANT POPULATIONS , 2000 .

[34]  K. Hikosaka,et al.  Leaf‐level nitrogen‐use efficiency of canopy and understorey species in a beech forest , 2002 .

[35]  David J. Harding,et al.  A portable LIDAR system for rapid determination of forest canopy structure , 2004 .

[36]  Marcel Abendroth.  Physiological Plant Ecology Ecophysiology And Stress Physiology Of Functional Groups , 2016 .

[37]  M. Werger,et al.  Canopy Structure and Photon Flux Partitioning Among Species in a Herbaceous Plant Community , 1995 .

[38]  O. Kull,et al.  Photon flux partitioning among species along a productivity gradient of an herbaceous plant community , 2006 .

[39]  T. Kohyama,et al.  CROWN ARCHITECTURE AND LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS OF 14 TREE SPECIES IN A WARM-TEMPERATE RAIN FOREST : SIGNIFICANCE OF SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY , 1997 .

[40]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Response of a Deciduous Forest to the Mount Pinatubo Eruption: Enhanced Photosynthesis , 2003, Science.

[41]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Size variability and competition in plant monocultures , 1986 .

[42]  F. Bongers,et al.  Beyond the regeneration phase: differentiation of height–light trajectories among tropical tree species , 2005 .

[43]  N. Anten,et al.  Interspecific differences in above‐ground growth patterns result in spatial and temporal partitioning of light among species in a tall‐grass meadow , 1999 .

[44]  D. A. King.  Correlations between biomass allocation, relative growth rate and light environment in tropical forest saplings , 1991 .

[45]  T. Kohyama,et al.  Size-structured tree populations in gap-dynamic forest-the forest architecture hypothesis for the stable coexistence of species , 1993 .