A kinesthetic teaching approach for automating micropipetting repetitive tasks

Nowadays, a laboratory operator in the areas of chemistry, biology or medicine spends considerable time performing micropipetting procedures, a common, monotonous and repetitive task which compromises the ergonomics of individuals, namely related to wrist musculoskeletal disorders. In this work, the design of a kinesthetic teaching approach for automating the micropipetting technique is presented, allowing to redirect the operator to other non-repetitive tasks, aiming to reduce the exposure to ergonomic risks. The proposed robotic solution has an innovative gripping system capable of supporting, actuating and regulating the volume of a manual micropipette. The system is able to configure the position of diverse laboratory materials, such as lab containers and plates, on the workbench through a collaborative robotic arm, providing flexibility to adapt to different procedures. A projected human-machine interface, which combines the display of information on the workbench with an infrared based interaction device was developed, providing a more intuitive interaction between the operator and the system during the configuration and operation phases. In contrast to the majority of the existing liquid handling systems, the proposed system allows the operator to place the materials freely on the workbench and the usage of different materials’ variants, facilitating the implementation of the system in any laboratory. The attained performance and ease of use of the system were very encouraging since all the defined tasks in the conducted experiments were successfully performed by users with minimum training, highlighting its potential inclusion in the laboratory routine panorama.

[1]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  Robot Programming by Demonstration , 2009, Springer Handbook of Robotics.

[2]  A. Barr,et al.  Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the hand and wrist: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and sensorimotor changes. , 2004, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[3]  S. Gan,et al.  Enzyme immunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. , 2013, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[4]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  Robot Program 59. Robot Programming by Demonstration , 2008 .

[5]  Liang Yuan,et al.  Automatic Liquid Handling for Life Science , 2012, Journal of laboratory automation.

[6]  John Z. Wu,et al.  The musculoskeletal loading profile of the thumb during pipetting based on tendon displacement. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  Nobuto Matsuhira,et al.  Virtual Robot Experimentation Platform V-REP: A Versatile 3D Robot Simulator , 2010, SIMPAR.

[8]  Sonia Chernova,et al.  Recent Advances in Robot Learning from Demonstration , 2020, Annu. Rev. Control. Robotics Auton. Syst..

[9]  Norbert Krüger,et al.  A comparison of types of robot control for programming by Demonstration , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[10]  P. Chappell,et al.  Hand and arm injuries associated with repetitive manual work in industry: a review of disorders, risk factors and preventive measures. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[11]  Germano Veiga,et al.  Interactive Industrial Robot Programming for the Ceramic Industry , 2013 .

[12]  Nikolaus Correll,et al.  Reducing the Barrier to Entry of Complex Robotic Software: a MoveIt! Case Study , 2014, ArXiv.