Novel procedure for generating continuous flash suppression: Seurat meets Mondrian.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Randolph Blake | Oakyoon Cha | Sang Chul Chong | David A. Tovar | David A Tovar | Gaeun Son | R. Blake | S. C. Chong | Oakyoon Cha | Gaeun Son
[1] Matthias Bethge,et al. Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNet , 2019, ICLR.
[2] Guido Hesselmann,et al. Weighing the evidence for a dorsal processing bias under continuous flash suppression , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.
[3] Kazuyuki Shinohara,et al. Emotional faces influence numerosity estimation without awareness , 2016, Cognitive Processing.
[4] Marius V. Peelen,et al. Privileged detection of conspecifics: Evidence from inversion effects during continuous flash suppression , 2012, Cognition.
[5] Derek H. Arnold,et al. Learning to reach for ‘invisible’ visual input , 2011, Current Biology.
[6] R. Blake,et al. On the use of continuous flash suppression for the study of visual processing outside of awareness , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[7] Bradford Z. Mahon,et al. The Role of the Dorsal Visual Processing Stream in Tool Identification , 2010, Psychological science.
[8] D. Alais,et al. The temporal frequency tuning of continuous flash suppression reveals peak suppression at very low frequencies , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[9] P. Sterzer,et al. High-level face shape adaptation depends on visual awareness: evidence from continuous flash suppression. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[10] Felix D. Schönbrodt,et al. Sequential Hypothesis Testing With Bayes Factors: Efficiently Testing Mean Differences , 2017, Psychological methods.
[11] J. Wagemans,et al. Continuous Flash Suppression: Stimulus Fractionation rather than Integration , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[12] W. Levelt,et al. The ‘laws’ of binocular rivalry: 50 years of Levelt’s propositions , 2015, Vision Research.
[13] Frédéric Gosselin,et al. Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks , 2001, Vision Research.
[14] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. Deep Supervised, but Not Unsupervised, Models May Explain IT Cortical Representation , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[15] A. Oliva,et al. From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .
[16] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[17] R. Blake,et al. Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression. , 2007, Emotion.
[18] M. Rothkirch,et al. No evidence for dorsal-stream-based priming under continuous flash suppression , 2018, Consciousness and Cognition.
[19] V. Franz,et al. Learning to detect but not to grasp suppressed visual stimuli , 2013, Neuropsychologia.
[20] Jukka Häkkinen,et al. CFS MATLAB toolbox: An experiment builder for continuous flash suppression (CFS) task , 2017, Behavior Research Methods.
[21] Daniel D. Dilks,et al. The occipital place area represents the local elements of scenes , 2016, NeuroImage.
[22] Antonio Torralba,et al. Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.
[23] Do P. M. Tromp,et al. Awareness of Emotional Stimuli Determines the Behavioral Consequences of Amygdala Activation and Amygdala-Prefrontal Connectivity , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[24] Dominique Lamy,et al. Integration Without Awareness , 2011, Psychological science.
[25] Dwight J. Kravitz,et al. Deconstructing visual scenes in cortex: gradients of object and spatial layout information. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.
[26] Philipp Sterzer,et al. Neural processing of visual information under interocular suppression: a critical review , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[27] Timothy F. Brady,et al. Conceptual Distinctiveness Supports Detailed Visual Long-term Memory for Real-world Objects the Fidelity of Long-term Memory for Visual Information , 2022 .
[28] Surya Gayet,et al. Between-Subject Variability in the Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression Paradigm: Potential Causes, Consequences, and Solutions , 2017, Front. Psychol..
[29] P. Schyns,et al. Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[30] F. Fang,et al. Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.
[31] R. Blake,et al. Individual differences in continuous flash suppression: Potency and linkages to binocular rivalry dynamics , 2019, Vision Research.
[32] R. Blake,et al. Do recognizable figures enjoy an advantage in binocular rivalry , 1992 .
[33] S. C. Chong,et al. Less Is More: Semantic Information Survives Interocular Suppression When Attention Is Diverted , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[34] Katie L. H. Gray,et al. Are visual threats prioritized without awareness? A critical review and meta-analysis involving 3 behavioral paradigms and 2696 observers. , 2016, Psychological bulletin.
[35] Kevin C. Dieter,et al. Does visual attention drive the dynamics of bistable perception? , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[36] Johan Wagemans,et al. Scene Integration Without Awareness , 2016, Psychological science.
[37] D G Pelli,et al. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[38] Axel Cleeremans,et al. Spontaneous eyeblinks during breaking continuous flash suppression are associated with increased detection times. , 2016, Journal of vision.
[39] Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al. Psychophysical “blinding” methods reveal a functional hierarchy of unconscious visual processing , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.
[40] R. Blake,et al. Monocular Perceptual Deprivation from Interocular Suppression Temporarily Imbalances Ocular Dominance , 2017, Current Biology.
[41] J. Rouder. Optional stopping: No problem for Bayesians , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[42] Shinya Sakai,et al. Does the Human Dorsal Stream Really Process a Category for Tools? , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[43] Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al. Beyond differences in means: robust graphical methods to compare two groups in neuroscience , 2017 .
[44] A. Oliva,et al. Flexible, Diagnosticity-Driven, Rather Than Fixed, Perceptually Determined Scale Selection in Scene and Face Recognition , 1997, Perception.
[45] Randolph Blake,et al. Deconstructing continuous flash suppression. , 2012, Journal of vision.
[46] P. Hsieh,et al. Can a Word Sound Like a Shape Before You Have Seen It? Sound-Shape Mapping Prior to Conscious Awareness , 2017, Psychological science.
[47] Z. Dienes. Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On? , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[48] Sheng He,et al. Processing of Invisible Stimuli: Advantage of Upright Faces and Recognizable Words in Overcoming Interocular Suppression , 2007, Psychological science.
[49] Alessio Fracasso,et al. Unseen complex motion is modulated by attention and generates a visible aftereffect. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[50] Darya L. Zabelina,et al. Suppressed semantic information accelerates analytic problem solving , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[51] Sheng He,et al. Seeing the invisible: The scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.
[52] Antonio Torralba,et al. Comparison of deep neural networks to spatio-temporal cortical dynamics of human visual object recognition reveals hierarchical correspondence , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[53] Randolph Blake,et al. Journal Section: Behavior/systems/cognitive Title: Semantic Analysis Does Not Occur in the Absence of Awareness Induced by Interocular Suppression Abbreviated Title: No Semantic Processing during Interocular Suppression , 2022 .
[54] Randolph Blake,et al. Psychophysical magic: rendering the visible ‘invisible’ , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[55] Chris L. E. Paffen,et al. Breaking continuous flash suppression: competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[56] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[57] Marcia Grabowecky,et al. Awareness Becomes Necessary Between Adaptive Pattern Coding of Open and Closed Curvatures , 2011, Psychological science.
[58] Erik Blaser,et al. Assessing the kaleidoscope of monocular deprivation effects. , 2018, Journal of vision.
[59] K. Nakayama,et al. Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Neuron.
[60] David Alais,et al. Strength of continuous flash suppression is optimal when target and masker modulation rates are matched. , 2018, Journal of vision.
[61] Norbert Kathmann,et al. Differential modulation of visual object processing in dorsal and ventral stream by stimulus visibility , 2016, Cortex.
[62] Fang Fang,et al. A gender- and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[63] Hugh Rabagliati,et al. The Importance of Awareness for Understanding Language , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[64] D. Alais,et al. Touch Accelerates Visual Awareness , 2017, i-Perception.
[65] G. Rees,et al. Fine-scale activity patterns in high-level visual areas encode the category of invisible objects. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[66] Dwight J. Kravitz,et al. Real-World Scene Representations in High-Level Visual Cortex: It's the Spaces More Than the Places , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[67] Erich W Graf,et al. Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[68] Alexander Todorov,et al. The determinants of consciousness of human faces , 2018, Nature Human Behaviour.
[69] Marco Tullio Liuzza,et al. Subliminal perception of others’ physical pain and pleasure , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.
[70] Kazushi Maruya,et al. Adaptation to invisible motion results in low-level but not high-level aftereffects. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[71] Pietro Perona,et al. Graph-Based Visual Saliency , 2006, NIPS.
[72] Wendy J Adams,et al. Faces and awareness: low-level, not emotional factors determine perceptual dominance. , 2013, Emotion.
[73] Christof Koch,et al. A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .
[74] R. Blake,et al. Normalization Regulates Competition for Visual Awareness , 2012, Neuron.
[75] J. DiCarlo,et al. Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.
[76] Philippe A. Chouinard,et al. Perceptual size discrimination requires awareness and late visual areas: A continuous flash suppression and interocular transfer study , 2019, Consciousness and Cognition.
[77] C. Koch,et al. Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.
[78] Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al. Seeing Fear: It’s All in the Eyes? , 2018, Trends in Neurosciences.