Image compression with multiresolution singular value decomposition and other methods

Digital image compression with multiresolution singular value decomposition is compared with discrete cosine transform, discrete 9/7 biorthogonal wavelet transform, Karhunen-Loeve transform, and combinations thereof. The coding methods used SPIHT and run-length with Huffmann coding. The performances of these methods differ little from each other. Generally, the 9/7 biorthogonal wavelet transform is superior for most images that were tested for given compression rates. But for certain block transforms and certain images other methods are slightly superior.

[1]  Jan J. Gerbrands,et al.  On the relationships between SVD, KLT and PCA , 1981, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  John Håkon Husøy,et al.  A critique of SVD-based image coding systems , 1999, ISCAS'99. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems VLSI (Cat. No.99CH36349).

[3]  Tor A. Ramstad,et al.  Hybrid KLT-SVD image compression , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[4]  Philip Ogunbona,et al.  Signal analysis using a multiresolution form of the singular value decomposition , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[5]  Michel Barlaud,et al.  Image coding using wavelet transform , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  Anil K. Jain.  Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing , 2018, Control of Color Imaging Systems.

[7]  William A. Pearlman,et al.  A new, fast, and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees , 1996, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[8]  Michael Unser.  Extension of the Karhunen-Loeve transform for wavelets and perfect reconstruction filterbanks , 1993, Optics & Photonics.