Integrated IT Platform for Coordination of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Aftercare of Prosthetic Joint Infections

Background/Aim: Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are difficult to diagnose and treat. For a correct diagnosis, an array of information has to be processed and weighted. Successful treatment depends on the diagnosis, timing, and surgical strategy paired with treatment of the infectious agent. The complexity and interdisciplinarity needed cause difficulties concerning decision-making, the communication between disciplines, and the execution of a treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to develop a software platform to enhance the collection of information for the diagnosis of PJI, the interdisciplinary decision-making process, the communication between team members, and continuous evaluation of treatment. Patients and Methods: In regular planning sessions with an information technology (IT) specialist, a concept for an IT solution was chosen and the tool was designed in an interdisciplinary approach. Results: The tool has been used as a trial version since June 2017. It consists of 14 user interfaces with 431 items. A total of 117 patients with 118 infections have been entered and the strategy decided upon and communicated using 298 infection board documents outlining the treatment. The tool is now being used to organize the infections board agenda, schedule patient case discussions, document the relevant data and treatment plan, as well as communicate with the other teams involved in the treatment. Conclusion: Using the developed tool enables the infections team to work collaboratively and under division of labor on each case, rendering the work flow more efficient for each team member.

[1]  G. Kremer,et al.  Evaluation of an infectious disease consultation programme in a German tertiary care hospital , 2013, Infection.

[2]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  R A Rocha,et al.  Lessons learned for collaborative clinical content development. , 2013, Applied clinical informatics.

[5]  J. Parvizi,et al.  New Definition for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: From the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  L. Drago,et al.  Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  R. von Eisenhart-Rothe,et al.  Implementation of an Algorithm for Prosthetic Joint Infection : Deviations and Problems , 2016 .

[8]  T. Clemmer,et al.  A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Management of periprosthetic joint infection: the current knowledge: AAOS exhibit selection. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  A. Alier,et al.  Prosthesis Failure Within 2 Years of Implantation Is Highly Predictive of Infection , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  F. Debus,et al.  [The TraumaNetzwerk DGU project. Goals, conception, and successes achieved]. , 2013, Der Unfallchirurg.

[12]  W J Martone,et al.  CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. , 1992, American journal of infection control.

[13]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Effect of whole-body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: a retrospective, multicentre study , 2009, The Lancet.

[14]  M. Assal,et al.  Low incidence of haematogenous seeding to total hip and knee prostheses in patients with remote infections. , 2009, The Journal of infection.

[15]  P. Beaulé,et al.  Tertiary care centre adherence to unified guidelines for management of periprosthetic joint infections: a gap analysis. , 2018, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[16]  J. Parvizi,et al.  AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline: diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. , 2010, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[17]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis: a complete understanding of white blood cell count and differential. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[18]  F. Debus,et al.  TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®): optimizing patient flow and management. , 2014, Injury.

[19]  M. L. MühlhoferHeinrich,et al.  Implementation of an Algorithm for Prosthetic Joint Infection: Deviations and Problems , 2017 .

[20]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection , 2014, Journal of Orthopaedic Research.

[22]  B. Fink,et al.  High Diagnostic Value of Synovial Biopsy in Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  David Hartzband,et al.  Deployment of Analytics into the Healthcare Safety Net: Lessons Learned , 2015, Online journal of public health informatics.

[24]  Miki Akiyama,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Economic Evaluation of Telemedicine in Japan , 2016, Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi.

[25]  S. Sporer,et al.  Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  Blackford Middleton,et al.  The value of provider-to-provider telehealth. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.