Towards multiscalar and multiparameter networks for the next century: The French efforts

Abstract The design of the future networks cannot be separated from the scientific issues which scientists are faced to, nor from the new technology tools that are to be developed for the next century. The trilogy, science, scientist and instrument must be well balanced in order to make implementation of the network achievable. Since most of the scientific issues are multiscalar for spatial scales as well as for temporal scales, we present the general design of the network which should enable us to address these scientific issues. They must be able to explore different scales of heterogeneities from global scale to local scale. We review in this paper the different technological developments, which are presently explored, and which prefigure what will be the future geophysical networks. The technical developments carried out by various French scientific programs (GEOSCOPE, OPTIMISM, SOFM) will be presented as an illustration. The concept of multiparameter station is defined and it demonstrated the great scientific interest in installing different kinds of sensors at the same place in a seismic station. Every seismic station will have to be transformed into a multiparameter geophysical station. It is also necessary to cover the oceanic desert by a dense network of geophysical observatories which can fulfill the scientific requirements of the whole geoscientist community. The recent progresses made by Japanese, French and US groups show that the technical challenge of installing permanent geophysical ocean bottom observatories (coined GOBOs) is not out of reach. Therefore, the new generation network will have to be composed of multiparameter continental or oceanic stations including at least broadband seismometers, microbarometers, microthermometers, and eventually other sensors (electromagnetic sensors, strainmeters, GPS,…). The design of the complete chain of acquisition, from the sensor to the distribution of data, will imply the integration of all the technical progresses made in micromechanics, electronics, computers, space science, and telecommunication systems. Finally, the new generation of geophysical networks must be able to provide scientific data at all scales, from the global scale to the local scale. The networks at all scales must be coordinated in order to constitute a hierarchical or multiscalar network, which will constitute the basic tool for addressing scientific issues in geosciences. The efforts necessary to achieve such a hierarchical, multiparameter network represent a formidable technological challenge for the next ten years.

[1]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  Searching for slow and silent earthquakes using free oscillations , 1990 .

[2]  John H. Woodhouse,et al.  Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity , 1981 .

[3]  Stuart P. Nishenko,et al.  Comment on “Seismic gap hypothesis: Ten years after” by Y. Y. Kagan and D. D. Jackson , 1993 .

[4]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  The French Pilot Experiment OFM-SISMOBS: first scientific results on noise level and event detection , 1994 .

[5]  Wei-jia Su,et al.  Predominance of long-wavelength heterogeneity in the mantle , 1991, Nature.

[6]  John Langbein,et al.  The earthquake prediction experiment at Parkfield, California , 1994 .

[7]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Asperities, barriers, characteristic earthquakes and strong motion prediction , 1984 .

[8]  Mark A. Richards,et al.  The origin of large scale structure in mantle convection: Effects of plate motions and viscosity stratification , 1996 .

[9]  Andrea Morelli,et al.  Topography of the core–mantle boundary and lateral homogeneity of the liquid core , 1987, Nature.

[10]  G. Roult,et al.  The-GEOSCOPE Program , 1994 .

[11]  Pierre Briole,et al.  Seismic and electrical anisotropy in the Mornos Delta, Gulf of Corinth, Greece, and its relationship with GPS strain measurements , 1997 .

[12]  David J. Stevenson,et al.  Effects of multiple phase transitions in a three-dimensional spherical model of convection in Earth's mantle , 1994 .

[13]  Donald R. Peacor,et al.  Origin of magnetite responsible for remagnetization of Early Paleozoic limestones of New York State , 1993 .

[14]  Jean-Paul Montagner,et al.  Global upper mantle tomography of seismic velocities and anisotropies , 1991 .

[15]  R. E. Needham,et al.  Moment-tensor solutions estimated using optimal filter theory: global seismicity, 1988–1989 , 1991 .

[16]  W. Hanka,et al.  The GEOFON Program , 1994 .

[17]  J. Montagner,et al.  Time evolution of broadband seismic noise during the French Pilot Experiment OFM/SISMOBS , 1996 .

[18]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Fault plane with barriers: A versatile earthquake model , 1977 .

[19]  Michael E. Wysession,et al.  Mapping the lowermost mantle using core‐reflected shear waves , 1994 .

[20]  Jean-Paul Montagner,et al.  Can seismology tell us anything about convection in the mantle , 1994 .

[21]  J. V. Firth,et al.  Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, 136 Initial Reports , 1992 .

[22]  Philippe Lognonné,et al.  Ultra broad band seismology on InterMarsNet , 1996 .

[23]  J.-F. Karczewski,et al.  Correction to “Time evolution of broadband seismic noise during the French Pilot Experiment OFM/SISMOBS” , 1997 .

[24]  Naoshi Hirata,et al.  Performance of the Ocean Broadband Downhole Seismometer at Site 794 , 1992 .

[25]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Seismic Gap Hypothesis: Ten years after , 1991 .

[26]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  Toward a federation of broadband seismic networks , 1986 .

[27]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Seismological evidence for differential rotation of the Earth's inner core , 1996, Nature.

[28]  Michael E. Wysession,et al.  The structure of the core‐mantle boundary from diffracted waves , 1992 .

[29]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  A first step toward an oceanic geophysical observatory , 1994 .

[30]  P. Lognonné,et al.  The effects of the atmospheric pressure changes on seismic signals or how to improve the quality of a station , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[31]  J. Rice.  Spatio‐temporal complexity of slip on a fault , 1993 .

[32]  Naoshi Hirata,et al.  68. BROADBAND DOWNHOLE DIGITAL SEISMOMETER EXPERIMENT AT SITE 794: A TECHNICAL PAPER1 , 1992 .

[33]  W. H. Bakun,et al.  The Parkfield, California, Earthquake Prediction Experiment , 1985, Science.

[34]  E. Wielandt,et al.  The leaf-spring seismometer: Design and performance , 1982 .

[35]  Wei-jia Su,et al.  On the scale of mantle heterogeneity , 1992 .

[36]  Thomas H. Jordan,et al.  Teleseismic Detection of a Slow Precursor to the Great 1989 Macquarie Ridge Earthquake , 1993, Science.

[37]  Toshiro Tanimoto,et al.  Predominance of Large-Scale Heterogeneity and the Shift of Velocity Anomalies between the Upper and Lower Mantle , 1990 .

[38]  Ralph A. Stephen,et al.  Campagne FARE: Wireline reentry of DSDP Hole 396B using the NADIA System , 1989 .

[39]  Hitoshi Kawakatsu,et al.  Automated near‐realtime CMT inversion , 1995 .

[40]  Mioara Mandea-Alexandrescu.  Le champ geomagnetique et ses observatoires , 1996 .

[41]  D. P. Schwartz,et al.  Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas Fault Zones , 1984 .

[42]  W. Zürn,et al.  On noise reduction in vertical seismic records below 2 mHz using local barometric pressure , 1995 .