Defining a Metadata Schema for Serious Games as Learning Objects

Games are increasingly recognized for their educational potential. However, when used as a learning resource, games can differ substantially from other educational media. They often combine high-fidelity audio and video content with experiential, social, or exploratory pedagogy. As educators increasingly turn to technology to support the delivery and management of content, the capability to describe and package serious games effectively as reusable learning objects (LOs) is increasingly vital. Doing so requires developing the capability to express games not in terms of technical boundaries, but as coherent and discrete LOs, which can be reused and combined. Enabling this requires metadata be attached to games, whilst making the metadata schema explicit to allow the use of the metadata beyond its original scope. Furthermore, standardisation of metadata schema means that systems are able to work together and use data interchangeably. However, current standards for describing educational content cannot directly be utilized to describe these serious games as educational resources. This makes it difficult to include serious games in repositories of learning objects and to describe them in a coherent way in the various online repositories. This paper introduces a metadata schema for describing serious games as educational resources, based on existing standards, so that serious games content can be described within online repositories.

[1]  Ann O'Brien,et al.  Learning Objects Update: Review and Critical Approach to Content Aggregation , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[2]  Rob Koper,et al.  IMS Learning Design , 2003 .

[3]  A. Lejeune IMS Learning Design , 2004 .

[4]  Alexandra Poulovassilis,et al.  Learning as immersive experiences: Using the four-dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive learning experiences in a virtual world , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[5]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  Learner-centered education , 1996, CACM.

[6]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[7]  Alexandra Poulovassilis,et al.  Developing an Evaluation Methodology for Immersive Learning Experiences in a Virtual World , 2009, 2009 Conference in Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications.

[8]  Aristidis Protopsaltis,et al.  Repurposing Serious Games in Health Care Education , 2010 .

[9]  Demetrios G. Sampson,et al.  Competence Based Educational Metadata for Supporting Lifelong Competence Development Programmes , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[10]  Ian Dunwell,et al.  Four-dimensional consideration of feedback in serious games , 2011 .

[11]  Alexandros Paramythis,et al.  Adaptive Learning Environments and e-Learning Standards. , 2004 .

[12]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games , 2002, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[13]  Marc Prensky,et al.  Digital game-based learning , 2000, CIE.

[14]  Charles R. Graham BLENDED LEARNING SYSTEMS: DEFINITION, CURRENT TRENDS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2005 .

[15]  S. Wilson What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy , 2006 .

[16]  Martin Oliver,et al.  A four dimensional framework for the evaluation and assessment of educational games , 2005 .

[17]  D. Dunn,et al.  Experiential Learning , 2019, High Impact Teaching for Sport and Exercise Psychology Educators.

[18]  Martin Oliver,et al.  How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Margie Martyn,et al.  The Hybrid Online Model: Good Practice , 2003 .

[20]  James F. Knight,et al.  Serious gaming technology in major incident triage training: a pragmatic controlled trial. , 2010, Resuscitation.

[21]  Iván Martínez-Ortiz,et al.  Integration and Deployment of Educational Games in e-Learning Environments: The Learning Object Model Meets Educational Gaming , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..