Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie

This study investigated conditions that enable viewers to predict future events while viewing a movie. Predictions about future events can be supported by visual, auditory, and discourse information. These information sources serve to emphasize or introduce the individually necessary, and jointly sufficient, conditions that support predictive inference processes. They may also introduce new, anomalous information that can be understood in terms of future story events. In Experiment 1, viewers were instructed to generate predictions while watching the James Bond movie, Moonraker (Broccoli & Gilbert, 1979).The presence of support through visual and discourse modes increased the likelihood that participants would generate a specific prediction. Furthermore, the likelihood of generating a given prediction increased with multiple sources of visual and discourse modes of support. In Experiment 2, participants provided think‐aloud protocols at different locations in the film, but were not instructed to generate ...

[1]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Executive Control Processes in Reading , 1987 .

[2]  A. Graesser.  Prose Comprehension Beyond the Word , 1981 .

[3]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively , 1986 .

[4]  P. Broek.  The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. , 1990 .

[5]  P. Broek,et al.  The role of readers' standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. , 1995 .

[6]  R. G. Collingwood.  V.—On the So-Called Idea of Causation , 1938 .

[7]  P. Whitney,et al.  The effect of foregrounding on readers’ use of predictive inferences , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Structures and Procedures of Implicit Knowledge , 1985 .

[9]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  The time course and durability of predictive inferences , 1993 .

[10]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming , 1988 .

[11]  David A. Balota.  Comprehension Processes in Reading. , 1990 .

[12]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Character and reader emotions in literary texts , 1995 .

[13]  Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer,et al.  The role of predictive inferences in situation model construction , 1993 .

[14]  Noel E. Sharkey,et al.  Weak contextual constraints in text and word priming , 1992 .

[15]  Charles R. Fletcher,et al.  Strategies for the allocation of short-term memory during comprehension , 1986 .

[16]  J. Earman,et al.  The Cement Of The Universe , 1974 .

[17]  J Stoeckert,et al.  Individual differences in television comprehension , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[18]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[19]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994 .

[20]  A. Graesser,et al.  The Psychology of Questions , 1985 .

[21]  D. Hilton,et al.  Knowledge-Based Causal Attribution: The Abnormal Conditions Focus Model , 1986 .

[22]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992 .

[23]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inferences about predictable events. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  Naturalistic Text Comprehension , 1994 .

[25]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Notes on audience response , 1996 .

[26]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures , 1978 .

[27]  Ariella Lehrer,et al.  The relationship between reading and cognitive processing of television and radio , 1984 .

[28]  J. M. Golding,et al.  Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension? , 1993 .

[29]  S. Neuman.  Is Learning From Media Distinctive? Examining Children’s Inferencing Strategies , 1992 .

[30]  William F. Brewer,et al.  Stories Are to Entertain: A Structural-Affect Theory of Stories. Technical Report No. 265. , 1982 .

[31]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text , 1991 .

[32]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Inferences during Reading: Converging Evidence from Discourse Analysis, Talk-Aloud Protocols, and Recognition Priming , 1993 .

[33]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[34]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation‐model construction , 1996 .

[35]  Gary M. Olson,et al.  Cognitive aspects of genre , 1981 .

[36]  J. M. Golding,et al.  A test of the on-line status of goal-related inferences , 1992 .

[37]  David Bordwell.  Narration in the Fiction Film , 1985 .

[38]  J. D. Murray,et al.  Forward Inferences in Narrative Text , 1993 .

[39]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Conscious understanding during comprehension , 1996 .

[40]  M. Singer,et al.  Validation of causal bridging inferences in discourse understanding. , 1992 .

[41]  David Bordwell,et al.  Film Art: An Introduction , 1979 .

[42]  S A Duffy,et al.  Role of expectations in sentence integration. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories , 1989 .

[44]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The time course of generating causal antecedent and causal consequence inferences , 1993 .

[45]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on‐line inferences and mental operations in working memory , 1993 .