Combination of conspicuity improved synthetic mammograms and digital breast tomosynthesis: a promising approach for mass detection

In this study, a novel mass detection framework that utilizes the information from synthetic mammograms has been developed for detecting masses in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). In clinical study, it is demonstrated that the combination of DBT and full field digital mammography (FFDM) increases the reader performance. To reduce the radiation dose in this approach, synthetic mammogram has been developed in previous researches and it is demonstrated that synthetic mammogram can alternate the FFDM when it is used with DBT. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of the combined approach of DBT and synthetic mammogram in point of computer-aided detection (CAD). As a synthetic mammogram, two-dimensional image was generated by adopting conspicuous voxels of three-dimensional DBT volume in our study. The mass likelihood scores estimated for each mass candidates in synthetic mammogram and DBT are merged to differentiate masses and false positives (FPs) in combined approach. We compared the performance of detecting masses in the proposed combined approach and DBT alone. A clinical data set of 196 DBT volumes was used to evaluate the different detection schemes. The combined approach achieved sensitivity of 80% and 89% with 1.16 and 2.37 FPs per DBT volume. The DBT alone approach achieved same sensitivities with 1.61 and 3.46 FPs per DBT volume. Experimental results show that statistically significant improvement (p = 0.002) is achieved in combined approach compared to DBT alone. These results imply that the information fusion of synthetic mammogram and DBT is a promising approach to detect masses in DBT.

[1]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Breast mass detection using slice conspicuity in 3D reconstructed digital breast volumes , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Andriy I Bandos,et al.  Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. , 2014, Radiology.

[3]  J. Baker,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[4]  David Gur,et al.  Fusion of digital breast tomosynthesis images via wavelet synthesis for improved lesion conspicuity , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Andriy I Bandos,et al.  Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images. , 2014, Radiology.

[6]  S. Rose,et al.  Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms. , 2013, Medical physics.

[9]  David Gur,et al.  Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observations. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[10]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. , 2006, Medical physics.

[11]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. , 2004, Medical physics.

[12]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches. , 2008, Medical physics.

[13]  Unni Haakenaasen,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting , 2012, Acta radiologica.

[14]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Generation of conspicuity-improved synthetic image from digital breast tomosynthesis , 2014, 2014 19th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing.

[15]  Mark A Helvie,et al.  Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications. , 2010, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[16]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Generating Synthetic Mammograms From Reconstructed Tomosynthesis Volumes , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach. , 2008, Medical physics.

[18]  Andriy I. Bandos,et al.  Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. , 2013, Radiology.

[19]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Detection of masses and architectural distortions in digital breast tomosynthesis images using fuzzy and a contrario approaches , 2014, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions. , 2013, Radiology.

[21]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast masses in mammography: combined detection and ensemble classification , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Mammographic enhancement with combining local statistical measures and sliding band filter for improved mass segmentation in mammograms , 2012, Medical Imaging.