Is a Single Energy Functional Sufficient? Adaptive Energy Functionals and Automatic Initialization

Energy functional minimization is an increasingly popular technique for image segmentation. However, it is far too commonly applied with hand-tuned parameters and initializations that have only been validated for a few images. Fixing these parameters over a set of images assumes the same parameters are ideal for each image. We highlight the effects of varying the parameters and initialization on segmentation accuracy and propose a framework for attaining improved results using image adaptive parameters and initializations. We provide an analytical definition of optimal weights for functional terms through an examination of segmentation in the context of image manifolds, where nearby images on the manifold require similar parameters and similar initializations. Our results validate that fixed parameters are insufficient in addressing the variability in real clinical data, that similar images require similar parameters, and demonstrate how these parameters correlate with the image manifold. We present significantly improved segmentations for synthetic images and a set of 470 clinical examples.

[1]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  Determining The Optimal Weights In Multiple Objective Function Optimization , 1988, [1988 Proceedings] Second International Conference on Computer Vision.

[2]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A discrete dynamic contour model , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[3]  Juha Koikkalainen,et al.  Model Library for Deformable Model-Based Segmentation of 3-D Brain MR-Images , 2002, MICCAI.

[4]  Yogesh Rathi,et al.  Shape-Based Approach to Robust Image Segmentation using Kernel PCA , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[5]  Yogesh Rathi,et al.  A Shape-Based Approach to Robust Image Segmentation , 2006, ICIAR.

[6]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI 2002 , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Active contours without edges , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[9]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Current methods in medical image segmentation. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[11]  O. Faugeras,et al.  Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours , 2002, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[12]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  The Manifold Ways of Perception , 2000, Science.

[13]  Vladimir Kolmogorov,et al.  Computing geodesics and minimal surfaces via graph cuts , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[14]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Geodesic Active Contours , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  STACS: new active contour scheme for cardiac MR image segmentation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.