Choice architecture and design with intent

Motivation - Choice architecture (Thaler & Sunstein, 2008) is a phrase of the moment among politicians and economists seeking to influence public behaviour, but the relevance of the concept to designers has received little attention. This paper places choice architecture within the context of Design with Intent--design intended to influence user behaviour. Research approach - The concepts are introduced and choice architecture is deconstructed. Findings/Design - Affordances and Simon's behavioural model (1955) help understand choice architecture in more detail. Research limitations/Implications - This is only a very brief, limited foray into what choice architecture is. Originality/Value - User behaviour can be a major determinant of product efficiency: user decisions can contribute significantly to environmental impacts. Understanding the reasons behind them, a range of design techniques can be identified to help users towards more efficient interactions. Take away message - The intended outcome is a useful design method for helping users use things more efficiently.

[1]  G. Kalyanaram,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2011 .

[2]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Influencing interaction: development of the design with intent method , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[3]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Design for behaviour change: The design with intent toolkit v.0.9 , 2009 .

[4]  Daniel G. Goldstein,et al.  Nudge Your Customers Toward Better Choices , 2008 .

[5]  Casper Boks,et al.  The ethics in balancing control and freedom when engineering solutions for sustainable behaviour , 2008 .

[6]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Design with Intent: Persuasive Technology in a Wider Context , 2008, PERSUASIVE.

[7]  M. Rizzo,et al.  Little Brother is Watching You: New Paternalism on the Slippery Slopes , 2008 .

[8]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Making the user more efficient: design for sustainable behaviour , 2008 .

[9]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Design for Sustainable Behaviour , 2008 .

[10]  Jay P. Kesan,et al.  Setting Software Defaults: Perspectives from Law, Computer Science and Behavioral Economics , 2006 .

[11]  Johan Redström Persuasive Design: Fringes and Foundations , 2006, PERSUASIVE.

[12]  W. Ray On being cybernetic , 2005 .

[13]  Carl Myhill,et al.  Commercial Success by Looking for Desire Lines , 2004, APCHI.

[14]  M. Newborough,et al.  Dynamic energy-consumption indicators for domestic appliances: environment, behaviour and design , 2003 .

[15]  Chicago Unbound Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron , 2003 .

[16]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[17]  Lt Lorna McCalley,et al.  Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation , 2002 .

[18]  Stephan Wensveen,et al.  But how, Donald, tell us how?: on the creation of meaning in interaction design through feedforward and inherent feedback , 2002, DIS '02.

[19]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concep , 2000, Graphics Interface.

[20]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concep , 2000, Graphics Interface.

[21]  Daniel Berdichevsky,et al.  Toward an ethics of persuasive technology , 1999, CACM.

[22]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Affordance, conventions, and design , 1999, INTR.

[23]  J Edworthy,et al.  Auditory affordances in the intensive treatment unit. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Designing for consumers: editorial , 1998 .

[25]  William W. Gaver Technology affordances , 1991, CHI.

[26]  H. Simon,et al.  Invariants of human behavior. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[28]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Declaration by Design: Rhetoric, Argument, and Demonstration in Design Practice , 1985 .

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[30]  G. Bachelard The Poetics of Space , 1958 .

[31]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .