Consensus based Nonlinear Guidance for Cooperative Salvo

This work focuses on devising cooperative salvo guidance strategies to intercept both moving and stationary targets. Salvo attack aids in overcoming the disadvantages associated with one-to-one engagement, such as countering close-in-weapon systems. The proposed cooperative guidance strategy considers a nonlinear engagement dynamics as well as a time-to-go estimate that accounts for large heading errors, thereby circumventing the problems associated with linearized engagement dynamics. The cooperation among interceptors stems from their interactions over different topologies, leading to consensus in their time-to-go estimates, which ensures salvo attack. Simulations demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed guidance strategies for the various initial engagement conditions.

[1]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Graph Theoretic Methods in Multiagent Networks , 2010, Princeton Series in Applied Mathematics.

[2]  Min-Jea Tahk,et al.  Nonsingular Sliding Mode Guidance for Impact Time Control , 2016 .

[3]  Debasish Ghose,et al.  Impact time guidance for large heading errors using sliding mode control , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[4]  Chang-Hun Lee,et al.  Design of impact angle control guidance laws via high-performance sliding mode control , 2013 .

[5]  Jianying Yang,et al.  Distributed Guidance Law Design for Cooperative Simultaneous Attacks with Multiple Missiles , 2016 .

[6]  Min-Jea Tahk,et al.  Time-to-go weighted optimal guidance with impact angle constraints , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[7]  Jianying Yang,et al.  Cooperative guidance for simultaneous attack: a fully distributed, adaptive, and optimal approach , 2018, Int. J. Control.

[8]  Gregg A. Harrison,et al.  Hybrid Guidance Law for Approach Angle and Time-of-Arrival Control , 2012 .

[9]  Min-Jea Tahk,et al.  Homing Guidance Law for Cooperative Attack of Multiple Missiles , 2010 .

[10]  Narsingh Deo,et al.  Graph Theory with Applications to Engineering and Computer Science , 1975, Networks.

[11]  Youdan Kim,et al.  Modified Pure Proportional Navigation Guidance Law for Impact Time Control , 2016 .

[12]  Min-Jea Tahk,et al.  Impact-time-control guidance law for anti-ship missiles , 2006, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[13]  Lei Liu,et al.  A composite impact-time-control guidance law and simultaneous arrival , 2018, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[14]  Li Da-peng Virtual-Leader Based Impact Time and Impact Angle Control , 2009 .

[15]  Alexander Schwab Cooperative control of dynamical systems , 2017 .

[16]  Nathan Harl,et al.  Impact Time and Angle Guidance With Sliding Mode Control , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[17]  Min-Jea Tahk,et al.  Impact-Time-Control Guidance with Generalized Proportional Navigation Based on Nonlinear Formulation , 2016 .

[18]  S. R. Kumar,et al.  Nonsingular Terminal Sliding Mode Guidance with Impact Angle Constraints , 2014 .

[19]  Zhou Rui,et al.  Design of Time-constrained Guidance Laws via Virtual Leader Approach , 2010 .

[20]  Youdan Kim,et al.  Lyapunov-based impact time control guidance laws against stationary targets , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[21]  Shashi Ranjan Kumar,et al.  Sliding mode guidance for impact time and angle constraints , 2018 .