Can there be energy policy in Sub-Saharan Africa without biomass?

Abstract While much of the industrialised world is embracing biomass energy as a pillar of low-carbon growth, a review of national energy policies in sub-Saharan Africa reveals that biomass is widely viewed as a retrogressive source of energy that degrades the environment and engenders poverty. Initiatives to formulate alternative energy policies based on recognition, formalisation and modernisation of the sector are not appreciated by decision-makers in government, whose vision of economic growth and poverty reduction is usually based on fossil fuels and electricity. The authors argue that as long as the significant contribution and future potential of biomass energy to generate employment, support urban–rural revenue flow, strengthen domestic energy security and drive green economic development remain unrecognised, African governments will continue to endorse ‘anything-but-biomass’ policies. In this context, the development of new sector strategies that give biomass a higher profile faces a significant political challenge and may ultimately prove futile. To bring about change it is argued that first, a new image of biomass energy must be articulated, which offers a compelling and achievable vision of modernisation in production, processing, distribution and consumption. This requires an integrated set of measures to communicate the message of change, promote enabling framework conditions, expand sustainable biomass supplies, strengthen regional economies and value-addition, and capitalise on recent technological advancement. Second, valorisation of forest resources is essential to stimulate sustainable production, conversion and consumption, and can be achieved through interventions in governance, taxation, regulation and technology. Third, the modernisation process should capitalise on momentous technological advances in stoves, kilns, processing systems and means of salvaging waste energy for productive use. Fourth, replication and scale-up of the modernisation movement can be leveraged using new and innovative funding sources.

[1]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[2]  Mario Ragwitz,et al.  Renewable energy policy country profiles. , 2011 .

[3]  N. Bruce,et al.  Indoor air pollution in developing countries: a major environmental and public health challenge. , 2000, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[4]  Keith Openshaw,et al.  Can biomass power development , 2010 .

[5]  Jan Bojo,et al.  Poverty reduction and the Millennium Development Goal on environmental sustainability : opportunities for alignment , 2003 .

[6]  Adrian Muller Sustainable agriculture and the production of biomass for energy use , 2009 .

[7]  Syed Waqar Haider,et al.  Wood-based biomass energy development for Sub-Saharan Africa : issues and approaches , 2011 .

[8]  S. Dasappa,et al.  Potential of biomass energy for electricity generation in sub-Saharan Africa , 2011 .

[9]  José Goldemberg,et al.  The Case for Renewable Energies , 2004 .

[10]  C. Beaton,et al.  Strategies for Reforming Fossil-Fuel Subsidies: Practical Lessons from Ghana, France and Senegal , 2010 .

[11]  C. Howorth,et al.  Twenty years of resolving the irresolvable: approaches to the fuelwood problem in Kenya , 2001 .

[12]  T. Johansson,et al.  Forests and energy , 2001 .

[13]  D. F. Bartlett,et al.  National Energy Policy , 1971 .

[14]  Klas Sander,et al.  Environmental crisis or sustainable development opportunity? Transforming the charcoal sector in Tanzania : a policy note , 2009 .

[15]  K. Openshaw Supply of Woody Biomass, Especially in the Tropics: Is Demand Outstripping Sustainable Supply? , 2011 .