Challenges in Assessing the Development of Writing Ability: Theories, Constructs and Methods.

Abstract This article discusses three sets of challenges involved in the assessment of writing from a developmental perspective. These challenges include defining a workable theory of development, developing a suitable construct, and overcoming limitations in technocentric approaches to writing assessment. In North America in recent years, a burgeoning number of scholars have begun to explore the development of writing ability through the lens of knowledge transfer research. This paper discusses limitations in current and traditional conceptions of transfer, proposing a bioecological model of transfer to resolve these issues. Related to issues of transfer are challenges in defining the construct under investigation in the assessment of writing development. Beaufort's (2007) model of expertise in writing is discussed as a promising framework for defining this construct. Related to these challenges are limitations in current assessment technologies. Drawing on Huot's (2002) concept of assessment-as-research, this article discusses possibilities for broadening the range of assessment practices available to assessors of writing.

[1]  Janna Fox,et al.  Awareness Versus Production: Probing Students’ Antecedent Genre Knowledge , 2010 .

[2]  David W Smit,et al.  The End of Composition Studies , 2007 .

[3]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  EFFICIENCY AND INNOVATION IN TRANSFER , 2005 .

[4]  G. Wiggins.  The constant danger of sacrificing validity to reliability: Making writing assessment serve writers , 1994 .

[5]  A. Purves.  Reflections on Research and Assessment in Written Composition. , 1992 .

[6]  U. Bronfenbrenner.  Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. , 1999 .

[7]  B. Huot,et al.  Re)articulating writing assessment for teaching and learning , 2002 .

[8]  D. Rowe.  Development of Writing Abilities in Childhood , 2007 .

[9]  Arthur N. Applebee.  Alternative models of writing development. , 2000 .

[10]  Kevin Roozen,et al.  Tracing Trajectories of Practice: Repurposing in One Student’s Developing Disciplinary Writing Processes , 2010 .

[11]  N. Graff.  Teaching Rhetorical Analysis to Promote Transfer of Learning , 2010 .

[12]  Linda S. Bergmann,et al.  Disciplinarity and Transfer: Students' Perceptions of Learning to Write , 2007 .

[13]  Leif Östman,et al.  A transactional approach to learning , 2010 .

[14]  David Slomp.  Harming not helping: The impact of a Canadian standardized writing assessment on curriculum and pedagogy , 2008 .

[15]  M. Sternglass.  Writing Development as Seen through Longitudinal Research , 1993 .

[16]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[17]  Richard H. Haswell.  Documenting Improvement in College Writing , 2000 .

[18]  Pamela A. Moss,et al.  Can There Be Validity Without Reliability? , 1994 .

[19]  King Beach,et al.  Chapter 4: Consequential Transitions: A Sociocultural Expedition Beyond Transfer in Education , 1999 .

[20]  M. S. Sternglass.  Time To Know Them: A Longitudinal Study of Writing and Learning at the College Level , 1997 .

[21]  Sarah W. Beck,et al.  An investigation of academic writing in secondary schools to inform the development of diagnostic classroom assessments , 2011 .

[22]  Joanne Lobato.  Alternative Perspectives on the Transfer of Learning: History, Issues, and Challenges for Future Research , 2006 .

[23]  K. Yancey.  Looking Back as We Look Forward: Historicizing Writing Assessment. , 1999 .

[24]  Heather C. Camp.  The psychology of writing development—And its implications for assessment , 2012 .

[25]  S. Messick.  Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment , 1989 .

[26]  Frank Pajares,et al.  SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS, MOTIVATION, AND ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE , 2003 .

[27]  E. Thorndike,et al.  The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. (I). , 1901 .

[28]  James Britton,et al.  The development of writing abilities , 1975 .

[29]  Anne Beaufort,et al.  College Writing and Beyond: A New Framework for University Writing Instruction , 2007 .

[30]  Gert Biesta,et al.  Understanding learning cultures , 2007 .

[31]  David Slomp,et al.  Following Phaedrus: Alternate choices in surmounting the reliability/validity dilemma , 2004 .

[32]  E. L. Hussey,et al.  “As You're Writing, You Have these Epiphanies” , 1999 .

[33]  Jay Parkes.  Reliability as Argument , 2007 .

[34]  N. Sommers,et al.  The Novice as Expert: Writing the Freshman Year , 2004, College Composition & Communication.

[35]  N. Elliot.  On a Scale: A Social History of Writing Assessment in America , 2005 .

[36]  E. Wardle,et al.  Addressing the complexity of writing development: Toward an ecological model of assessment , 2012 .

[37]  King Beach,et al.  Consequential transitions : A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education , 1999 .

[38]  S. Tomlinson.  Edward Lee Thorndike and John Dewey on the Science of Education , 1997 .

[39]  Mary Jo Reiff,et al.  Tracing Discursive Resources: How Students Use Prior Genre Knowledge to Negotiate New Writing Contexts in First-Year Composition , 2011 .

[40]  Jill V. Jeffery.  Constructs of writing proficiency in US state and national writing assessments: Exploring variability , 2009 .

[41]  Urie Bronfenbrenner,et al.  The Bioecological Model of Human Development , 2007 .

[42]  Liz Hamp-Lyons,et al.  Questioning Assumptions about Portfolio-Based Assessment , 1993 .